Month: August 2005

Yep , boys n girls. It’s time once more to CLICK on over to the latest Carnival of the Recipes

While it is a bit of an extension to say that the Constitution died at Appomattox, it’s not so much of a stretch to say the ACLU wants to put a stake in its heart…

(You may have noticed that the title of this post wasn’t “A clear and present danger.” That’s because the ACLU and their ilk do a good job of muddying the waters about what they are doing.)

Each small victory for the ACLU is a body blow to the Constitution, a blow against the rule of law and a victory over morality and the forces of civilization.

Does that seem like an outlandish statement to you? Let me direct your attention to a few things the ACLU is attacking now, or has been attacking:

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

vs.

“NYCLU [NYC chapter of ACLU] Urges Commuters To Report Stories On Bag Searches”_1_

Twisting the Fifth Amendment to make NYC citizens less safe. How nice. (What part of “provide for the common defence” does the ACLU/NYCLU not understand?)

And speaking of twisting the Fifth Amendment, read the Fifth Amendment:

“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Now, will you tell me just where in the Fifth Amendment a woman’s right to kill her unborn child is found? And yet, that’s what the ACLU argued to a runaway Supreme Court that the Fifth Amendment provided, so that they now claim that as one of their great victories:

1973 Roe v. Wade/ Doe v. Bolton One of the Court’s most significant decisions, Roe erased all existing criminal abortion laws and recognized a woman’s constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy. In Doe, the companion case, the Court ruled that whether an abortion is “necessary” is the attending physician’s call, to be made in light of all factors relevant to a woman’s well-being._2_

So much for the rule of law. If “rule of law” meant anything to the ACLU, then it’d be ruled by what the law says.

But what of the other Amendment dear to ACLU hearts (supposing such things can be found :-)? In First Amendment cases, the ACLU has been quick to do everything it can to intimidate with expensive lawsuits schools, cities and even private businesses whenever it finds expressions of Christian symbols or values, while either standing aside or finding plenty of resources to aid in the spread Islam, even to the point of aiding and supporting organizations like CAIR that actively support Islamic terrorism._3_; _4_; _5_

And what’s with this business of re-defining—and getting credulous justices to go along!—”free speech” as “free expression” in the First Amendment, when “free expression” is a term Madison, the author of the Amendment, said was nonsense? ALL the Framers understood “free speech” (and a “free press”) to mean discussion, either verbally or in print, of public policy. Grunts and howls and grabbing of genitalia and thrown feces (today called “artistic expression” by soi disant intellectual elites) they left to animals.

What other bloody chunks of the Constitution do you want the ACLU to tear off? Just give ’em room. Pretty soon the pack animals of the ACLU and their ilk will have the Constitution fully digested and all we will be left with will be the… uhm, “end product” of their work.

N.B. Much of the ACLU’s intrusion into private or state affairs is due to their twisting of the 14th Amendment to make all Federal laws and all aspects of the Constitution—as the ACLU twists its clear text meaning—apply in all private and local and state matters.

This has been another (day late) post for the Stop the ACLU Blogburst

21st Century
Paladin
A Lady’s Ruminations
A Tic In The Mind’s Eye
American Dinosaur
American Warmonger
An American Housewife
And Rightly So
Angry Republican Mom
Birth of a Neo-Con
Blog Talker
California Conservatives 4 Truth
Cao’s Blog
Christmas Ghost
Common Sense Runs Wild
Conservative Angst
Conservative Dialysis
Conservative Rant
Craig’s Reflections
Crosses aCross America
Daily Inklings
Def Conservative
** Euphoric Reality
Evil Conservative Blog
Freedom Of Thought
Freedom-Of
Fundamentally Right
GM’s Corner
Gribbit’s Word
Is It Just Me?
Is This Life?
It Is What It Is
JackLewis.net
Jo’s Cafe
Kender’s Musings
KiddSafe Blog
Kill Righty
Lady
Madonna- Headlines
Life Trek
Mad tech
Making Tomorrow’s Military
Today
** Mean Ol’ Meany
Meeyotch’s so called
“life”
Merri Musings
Miss Patriot
More Sense Than Money
** Mr Minority
Musing Minds
My Political Soapbox
** MyView
** NIF
** Obiter Dictum Blog
** Ogre’s View
Parrot Check
Patriots For Bush
PBS Watch
** Pirate’s Cove
RAGE
Rancher Blog
Ravings of John C. A. Bambenek
Red State Rant
Regular Ron
Respublica
Right On! A Conservative Opinion
Smithereen’s Files
** Steve’s Blog
Stop The ACLU
Stop The ACLU AZ
** Stop The ACLU Illinois
Stop The ACLU Kansas
Stop The ACLU Nevada
Stop The ACLU Ohio
Stop The ACLU Oklahoma
Stuff You Should Know
** Swap Blog
Sweet Spirits of Ammonia
The American Patriots
** The Conservative
UAW Guy
The Kevin Show
The Lesser of Two Evils
The Life And Times
The Nose On Your Face
The Uncooperative Blogger
The View From Firehouse
** The Wide Awakes
third world county
This Space For Rent
Thoughts from the Right
Time Hath Found Us
TMH’s Bacon Bits
Undiscovered
Country
Vista On Current Events
What Attitude Problem?
White Lightning Axiom:
Redux
Xtreme Right Wing
Zipcard2’s Blog

So, of course Rightwingduck climbs on the bandwagon…

heh

But seriously, folks, he’d just flown in from the Left Coast and his wingtips were tired, so NOT typing “county” was an excusable error, right?

CLICK on over, check out the roundup of humor (some, like my own “Silver Lining” post, aren’t really funny enough to be comedy, but they’re all humorous in one way or another), express your sympathy for Rightwingduck’s spelling disability and come on back here (thanks for offering up a correction already, Spacemonkey). We’ll dish on your take later.

[N.B. “anarcho-tyranny” is a term coined (as far as I know) by Jerry Pournelle meaning “using massive quantities of regulations to effectively eliminate the rule of law, by leaving everyone fearful that they’ll do something to bring the government down upon them. When everyone is already a criminal, government can do as it wishes, and find some basis to act against any of the criminals (i.e citizens) who are dumb enough ruin their lives by resisting.” _1_]

Yep. The link above is to a gummint site hosted pdf of an actual bill (H.R. 1279) sent from the House to the Senate. It’s as badly-written as the RICO statutes were. Just more excuses for feeb prosecutors to be able to “get” anyone they want, a la Martha Stewart. This one just enables a feeb prosecutor to nail darned near anyone they want to who has defended themselves and their family via use of a firearm.

Don’t believe me. Go read the whole thing and see what this bill aimed at “gang crime” could do in the hands of a prosecutor who would seek conviction of someone (Martha) for denying she had committed a crime… that was not a crime to begin with. (Yeh, the Martha case taught us all two lessons: they’ll get you if they want you and NEVER talk to the feebs. Never.)

BTW, how bad are the RICO laws this bill is patterned after? Out of tons of stories of abuses of RICO, here’s the bones of one I know personally. Imagine a family who moves 500 miles to a different state, builds a home and settles into a community. They don’t sell their previous home, but instead they contract with a management company to lease it to tenants.

A couple of years pass. They recieve peremptory notice from the feebs that their rental property has been siezed under RICO provisions cos some renters were using it for RICO-prohibited activities. They lost their property. Period. Also all the $$ they spent to stay out of prison themselves because the management company they had contracted with had rented ONE property (theirs) to some people who ran afoul of RICO statues.

Multiply that by all the other similar properties seized and innocent families persecuted by turf-building RICO feebs and then imagine how similar “gang-related” definitions can also be twisted against legitimate activities and associations.

There goes yet another piece of the First Amendment. And darned near the entire Second Amendment. The Fifth has been eviscerated by Kelo. We are well into a society, now, where “rights” are no longer rights inherent in The People but licenses which the government can strip, modify or simply deny at will.

We’re getting very close to needing a Tea Party. *sigh* (And I don’t really like tea all that much… )

hat tip to Cao for the lead on this.

Who really benefits from taxing business/corporation income?

At least, that’s how I read Messysoft’s latest as reported in this article.

“In IE7, we will fix as many of the worst bugs that web developers hit as we can, and we will add the critical most-requested features from the standards as well.” —Internet Explorer lead program manager Chris Wilson

A new twist on the old saw, “There’s a right way, a wrong way and the Microsoft way.” Cluebat to Wilson and his team: “fixing the worst bugs” (and leaving the rest) is NOT going to make Internet ExploDer fully web-compliant–or even fully CSS2 compliant (the point of the article).

I do still use IE to check web pages in every now and then. Fully standards-compliant pages always display best in browsers other than Internet Exploder.

Which is one reason (of many) the title bar in my copies of Internet ExploDer reads,

“Internet exploder: the world’s crappiest browser.”

Internet ExploDer. *sigh* I’d rather even be trapped using the clunky Opera-wannabe Firefox than M$’s crappy browser.

And just how important in a supposedly democratic republic is honesty and transparency in our political leaders, news media and public advocacy groups?

[NOTE: this is a combo post. Stop the ACLU/Free John Kerry’s records—both are subsumed in the content of this post.]

I would submit that honesty is an essential criterion for political leaders in a democratically republican nation. When one expects political leaders to have only one trustworthy statement in their repertoire (“Everything I tell you is suspect, if not an outright lie.”), then democratic rule of a republic is dead.

Oops. Did I just imply that democratic rule of the U.S. is dead? Well, yes. And if not dead, at least moribund.

Of course, honesty among reporters of news of importance to forming public policy is equally important. And I think it’s obvious we don’t have a preponderance of honest reporting among the Mass Media Podpeople. (For those who do not believe that, let me refer you to a good mortuary. Your embalming procedure is overdue.)

And honesty in public advocacy groups? NOW? the ACLU? CAIR? (Just to name a few of the most egregious group liars… )

No, the public forum is littered with the effluvia of dishonest discourse.

And what of transparency? Hugh Hewitt commented recently, concerning a WAPO reporter who requested, then declined to hold an interview with him after he simply requested that it be held live, on air on his show (for purposes of getting the FULL interview on record, not a twisted, excerpted portion),

“…she declined to conduct the interview she requested. How interesting to note that the Post is willing to use sources that insist on anonymity, but not sources that demand transparency.”

And what of Helen Thomas’ recent declaration that she would kill herself if Dick Cheney ran for President? You know, Thomas the Termagant, who insists that she can twist anything any politician she does not like any darned way she wants? heh

“I’ll never talk to a reporter again!” Thomas was overheard saying…

“Nobody has thinner skin than reporters,” Eisele [who reported Thomas’ suicide remark] said with a laugh. _1_

Yeh, Helen. Riiiight. It’s all fair game unless YOU are the subject of a news report.

Sauce for the goose.

But the same ought to go for any person or group that puts themselves in the position of attempting to affect public policy. Everything they say that at all relates to their positions, attitudes, actions and views as expressed in relation to their advocacy (politicians, Mass Media Podpeople, soi disant “public interest groups”—and even bloggers like me) is fair game for accurate quotation, commentary and review.

Or ought to be.

Politicians (OK, usually Liberalist—not authentically Liberal) often scream Foul! when confronted with their actual words or behaviors, accurately tossed back into their laps to deal with.

(BTW, John Fraud Kerry, where are your full and complete military records? They have yet to be released to the public.)

Newsies are the same, apparently.

And no one at the ACLU, CAIR or NOW are interested in having the public genuinely aware of how they make (or use) their “sausages” are they? The ACLU doesn’t like it when folks (accurately) claim they support pedophilia and terrorism. CAIR doesn’t like it when folks point to CAIR support of Islamic jihadist terrorism (_2_ and _3_. And many NOW members just hate it whenever anyone suggests they bathe (too many references to list. heh).

See Stop the ACLU for more info about the disingenuity and obfuscation typical of that subversive organization.

And do support holding politicians’ feet to the fire by continuing to call on Jean Fraud sKerry (known to some as John F. Kerry) to actually release his full military record to the public. See Cao’s Blog for someone doing the heavy lifting on this one.

Free John Kerry’s 180 Blogburst group:

Aaron’s cc
And Rightly So!
Atlas Shrugs
Balance Sheet
Cao’s Blog
Cathouse Chat
Christmas Ghost
Civil Issues
Conservative Friends
doubleplusgood infotainment
Doughnut Holes
Euphoric Reality
Flight Pundit
Fundamentally Right
Furry Press
GM’s Corner
Gribbit’s Word
House Of Wheels
i-imagery.com
Infinite Universe
International House of Conservatism
Jackson’s Junction
Jay Howard Smith
Kender’s Musings
Lifetrek
Moonbattery.com
My Vast Rightwing Conspiracy
NIF
PBSWatcher
Pirate’s Cove
Pooklekufr: The Kafir Constitutionalist
Power and Control
Private Radio
Progressive Conservatism
Ravings Of A Mad Tech
Republican Vet
Right in Philly
Rottweiler Puppy
Shades of Gray
Something…and Half of Something
Stop the ACLU
Tall Glass of Milk
The Babaganoosh
The Creative Conservative
The Dark Citadel
The Paragraph Farmer
The Pulpit Pounder
The Sunnyeside Of Life
Think About It
Third World County
TMH’s Bacon Bits
Uncle Jack
Villainous Company
Web-Nuts
What Attitude Problem?
Where’s Your Brain?
Word Park Blog

Lovely Daughter is “in the house” for a visit, and she made some Lovely Daughter Pasta for dinner recently. Yum.

This is one of those recipes where the ingredients are “measured” by those most delicate of chef’s instruments: smell and taste.

Ingredients:

• Enough of your fav pasta for the number of folks you wanna feed. Lovely Daughter used linguine nests, which seemed just right for this. Cook pasta al dente.
• One clove of garlic per person served. (OK, I have an amount for this one. 🙂 Crushed and minced (or use a garlic press, as Lovely Daughter did).
• Enough olive oil to just cover the crushed garlic in a small bowl.
• Crushed Oregano, Rosemary, Basil, Parsley, Red Pepper and Kosher Salt to smell/taste. (Add to crushed garlic/olive oil.)
• One tomato per person, diced, or enough grape tomatoes to go around, cut in halves.

Assembly is obvious.

Serve with your fav veggies and enjoy!

(A little freshly-ground black/green/white/pink pepper could be nice. I used my own lil idiosyncratic mix of three of the four.)

Stuff to post today. Let this be a placeholder for…

A really cool page w/lotsa patriotic mp3s thanks to Romeocat at Cathouse Chat. I’ll link it when I’m at the right computer, etc. Done, now, obviously.

News from Saudi Arabia: ding dong, one-a the witches is dead. Also h.t to Cathouse Chat. (Well, he wore dresses, didn’t he?) Links and comments will be edited into this post for the Saudi deal, too. Suffice it to say, plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose. *sigh*

Yeh, I know the death of one cockroach isn’t a sign that the whole colony is immediately on its way to the Eternal Crematorium. But still: one in the minus column for the Wahabbist terrorist enablers can’t be all bad, can it?

And yeh, there’s more. Just haven’t gotten around to it yet. Gimme a break. *VBG* 🙂

[OK, OK, I’m still not getting around to it. *sigh* Maybe tomorrow will be a day of blogolicious posting. I did get a great quasi-recipe from Lovely Daughter to whip into shape for Carnival of the Recipes, so there’s one for Tuesday… Be patient. The dog days of summer have bitten early.]

Lemme catch my breath… and pump down more of The Holy Brew, eh?