Month: September 2008

Watch the whole thing from which Charlie Gibson drew a partial comment out of context in order to make it say something Palin did NOT say:

In case you missed it, let me reproduce the relevant portions that Gibson either wittingly or stupidly twisted, with significant the words Gibson left out or glossed over with paraphrase:

” Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God… That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”

So, either Charlie Gibson did not actually listen to Palin’s comments or read a transcript or understand what he heard or read OR he did and deliberately edited her comments to twist them. Those words are plainly and clearly a conditional statement, anexhortation to pray for our national leaders to chose a path approved by God, to make their plan for Iraq line up with a Godly purpose.

That’s been a perfectly normal Christian thing to do for a couple of millennia–actually longer given Christian acceptance of the Jewish scripture as authoritative and such injunctions as to the Jews in captivity in pagan Babylon demand that the captives,

“Seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile, and pray to the Lord on its behalf; for in its welfare you will have welfare.” Jeremiah 29:7

And, among other passages in the New Testament exhorting Christians to be good citizens, Paul wrote to a young pastor concerning his new pastorate,

“1 I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men;

“2 For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.”–I Timothy 2: 1-2

Sarah Palin’s exhortation to pray THAT our leaders plan in agreement with God’s will is no statement of belief that their plans already are.

Any other reading of it is either disingenuous or stupid.

Therefore, Charlie Gibson is either an idiot (for not carefully listening to or reading her actual words or because of his inability to understand plain English) OR he is a liar for taking bits out of context and twisting them to say what she did not.

Either way, unless he recants his slander (that’s “lieing accusation”)–or ABC slaps him upside the head hard–ABC will be on my list of banned networks, just as CBS has been ever since Ra^thergate.

h.t. STACLU

UPDATE: OK, I’m going with option 3, that is, Gibson is a fool AND a liar. And the Mass Media Podpeople who’ve (that’ve? After all, their actual humanity is lessened the more deeply they’re absorbed into the Collective… ) jumped on this and other Gibson-Palin points, as noted by Bill Dyer (Beldar) guest Blogging at Hugh Hewitt’s place, about her “Bush Doctrine” NON-gaffe:

Anyone who criticizes Sarah Palin, then, for asking Charlie Gibson to be more specific about the “Bush Doctrine” is trying to mislead you in at least two ways:

They’re pretending that the term “Bush Doctrine” has a single clear, unambiguous meaning that anyone who follows national affairs ought to have immediately recognized. It doesn’t, as I think this post and the materials I’ve linked here more than adequately establish.

They’re pretending that because Gov. Palin didn’t immediately try to guess which of several plausible meanings Gibson meant to give that term, but instead asked for clarification, she therefore must have been unprepared to discuss any of them. Gov. Palin herself disproved that premise, because upon receiving the requested clarification, she immediately responded with clarity and self-assurance.

If they had bothered to look, even the Wikipedia could have cured Josh Marshall, Greg Sargent, or Andrew Sullivan of their illusion that there’s a single, simple meaning to the term “Bush Doctrine.”

Yeh, I think I’ll stick with “Charlie Gibson and other Mass Media Podpeople Hivemind Spores of its ilk are fools and liars.”

Trackposted to The Pink Flamingo, , CORSARI D’ITALIA, Democrat=Socialist, Right Truth, and The World According to Carl, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

When it’s in Newsweek, apparently.

Beldarblog has the beat.

A taste:

Does Newsweek actually think anyone in America is going to fault Sarah Palin, or her sister or anyone else in their family, for expressing a less-than-flattering opinion of Trooper Wooten based on this and his other incredibly reckless, dangerous, and/or illegal conduct?

This attack on Palin is so transparently manufactured, it only will only serve to bolster the reality-based reality *heh* as experienced by real people that the Mass Media Podpeople Hivemind has lost its. It’s collective mind, that is.

More of this insanity, please, from the Hivemind. And folks, give them plenty of room and plenty of rope. And remember, that wise old saying I coined last week applies to the Hivemind as well:

“Never interrupt a man [or Hivemind] when it’s committing suicide with the jawbone of an ass.”

Out ‘n’ about in the real world, folks I’ve interacted with are getting some confused signals, mixed messages, and a wild array of rumors thrown at them–some from traditional “news” sources. I usually let ’em in on some ways they can do their own homework, and I sometimes also tell them what I’ve discovered–then again tell them to do their own homework, of course.

Here’s a decent place to start:

Factcheck.org

And here’s a short sample from its bullet points on rumors–and false news reports–it’s already checked for factual content:

*Palin did not cut funding for special needs education in Alaska by 62 percent. She didn’t cut it at all. In fact, she tripled per-pupil funding over just three years.

*She did not demand that books be banned from the Wasilla library. Some of the books on a widely circulated list were not even in print at the time. The librarian has said Palin asked a “What if?” question, but the librarian continued in her job through most of Palin’s first term.

*She was never a member of the Alaskan Independence Party, a group that wants Alaskans to vote on whether they wish to secede from the United States. She’s been registered as a Republican since May 1982.

*Palin never endorsed or supported Pat Buchanan for president. She once wore a Buchanan button as a “courtesy” when he visited Wasilla, but shortly afterward she was appointed to co-chair of the campaign of Steve Forbes in the state.

*Palin has not pushed for teaching creationism in Alaska’s schools. She has said that students should be allowed to “debate both sides” of the evolution question, but she also said creationism “doesn’t have to be part of the curriculum.”

The analysis refuting these rumors and false reports is available at the link, but once again DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK. Don’t just accept an authority; check its research yourself. It’s all out there and available for anyone who can use a search engine, folks. Lies, damned lies and quotidian political *spit* hatchet jobs do NOT have to stand if folks will simply DO THEIR OWN HOMEWORK. A lazy, complacent electorate is all that’s needed for the triumph of evil (with not so sincere apologies to Lord Acton *heh*).

Trackposted to The Pink Flamingo, Rosemary’s Thoughts, Leaning Straight Up, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, Allie is Wired, and The World According to Carl, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

About that scandal the Mass Media Podpeople Hivemind is attempting to manufacture out of Governor Palin’s per diem and travel expenses. Let’s go to an organ that leans just slightly to the right of Lenin (which means light years to the right of the New York Times, of course)–

WaPo:

Palin, who earns $125,000 a year, claimed and received $16,951 as her allowance, which officials say was permitted because her official “duty station” is Juneau, according to an analysis of her travel documents by The Washington Post.

The governor’s daughters and husband charged the state $43,490 to travel, and many of the trips were between their house in Wasilla and Juneau, the capital city 600 miles away, the documents show.

Oh, my! Governor Palin claimed expenses allowed under the law! Scandal! Horror! Run for the hills!

Of course, let’s see if anything she did ameliorated even this horrible, legal use of benefits specifically allowed her…

—Fired [Retasked/transferred to another more useful-to-the-taxpayers job elsewhere in the state government] the Governor’s personal chef, an expense to the taxpayers of around $45,000/year. Hmmm… seems the per diem was offset by a factor of about 2.7.

Advantage: the people of Alaska.

Travel expenses:

–Palin’s family: $43,490 “in the first nineteen months” of her tenure in office. Let’s see, that works out to an annual amount of about $27,467.37

The previous administration? Governor Murkowski’s wife spent $30,637.25 in state travel expense money, mostly going on shopping trips.

So, no loss to the people of Alaska, and since there’s documentation–even the WaPo admits that–to support the official use by Palin’s family that trumps Mrs. Murkowski’s shopping trips, advantage: Palin.

And what of Palin’s travel expenses during her first nineteen months as governor? Was she a wastrel or did she indeed save the people f Alaska money?

The previous governor, Murkowski, spent $463,000 in his last year alone. Palin’s expenses for her first nineteen months have amounted to $93,000.

Advantage: the people of Alaska.

And naturally, in order to protect the WaPo’s false claim to objectivity, mitigating information is mentioned, but buried deep under the lede to attempt creating a false impression of inflated and somehow illegitimate “per diem” expenses. Oh? Near the foot of an “investigative” article,

“…under state policy, all of the governor’s children are entitled to per diem expenses, even her infant son” but as of August 5th, such expense reimbursements had been declined by the family.¹

Buried deep, where subliterate Americans are unlikely to venture, in a WaPo article, of course.

And at the foot of that same article,

“…during the Murkowski years, that practice was questioned, and the state attorney general’s office produced an opinion saying laws then in effect required reimbursement for spousal travel.”¹

But here’s the kicker–also buried in areas where few subliterate Americans dare to tread in the WaPo:

The popular governor collected the per diem allowance from April 22, four days after the birth of her fifth child, until June 3, when she flew to Juneau for two days. Palin moved her family to the capital during the legislative session last year, but prefers to stay in Wasilla and drive 45 miles to Anchorage to a state office building where she conducts most of her business, aides have said.¹

So, let me get this straight: the scandal is that Palin’s per diem allowance was paid while she worked from home on the business of the people of Alaska for a while after the birth of her fifth child, Trig. Oh! My! What an evil woman! That she didn’t simply claim maternity leave and tell the Alaskan people to go shove it but continued to do her job, or instead commute into Anchorage or Juneau and back and forth with a newborn ( legitimately charging for both her travel expenses and a per diem for herself and Trig while doing so) OR move her whole family into official digs, sop up the life of Riley with a personal chef and guzzle at the public trough like previous governors is evil, evil, evil! Yes, evil, I tell you!

*feh* Is that the best the Mass Media Podpeople Hivemind and its spores at DailyKos and Dhimmicrappic Underpants can do? Only absolute idiots will buy that crap. (But then again, by at least semi-objective criteria, about half the American public is made up of idiots, if one believes the polls that have the two presidential races at a virtual tie… )

Trackposted to Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Leaning Straight Up, Democrat=Socialist, and The World According to Carl, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.