What a difference an unconfessed bias makes

[Hey, Charlie! Denial’s not a river in Egypt… ]

Via Powerline, The Anchress offers this compare/contrast matchup of different Charlie Gibson interviews:

Obama interview:

How does it feel to break a glass ceiling?
How does it feel to “win”?
How does your family feel about your “winning” breaking a glass ceiling?
Who will be your VP?
Should you choose Hillary Clinton as VP?
Will you accept public finance?
What issues is your campaign about?
Will you visit Iraq?
Will you debate McCain at a town hall?
What did you think of your competitor’s [Clinton] speech?

Palin interview:

Do you have enough qualifications for the job you’re seeking? Specifically have you visited foreign countries and met foreign leaders?
Aren’t you conceited to be seeking this high level job?
Questions about foreign policy
-territorial integrity of Georgia
-allowing Georgia and Ukraine to be members of NATO
-NATO treaty
-Iranian nuclear threat
-what to do if Israel attacks Iran
-Al Qaeda motivations
-the Bush Doctrine
-attacking terrorists harbored by Pakistan
Is America fighting a holy war? [misquoted Palin]

Instructive, no?

Mending Walls: Politics

“Good fences make good neighbors.”


In several posts over the years here at twc, I’ve invoked the principles of Classicism. Usually these invocations are in aid of addressing the artistic merits–or more often lack thereof–of different expressions claiming artistic merit, but I think the principles have a broader application to society at large, as well. For review, here they are:

Aside from technical matters of form, the principles of Classicism, as found in Classical Music, were

  • balance
  • clarity
  • accessibility
  • expressiveness
  • edification

Think about it a bit. Wouldn’t it be better were political discourse to be balanced? No more thumb on the Mass Media Podpeople Hivemind scales or being in the tank for one viewpoint or candidate over another, just balanced reports by reporters who are aware of their biases and attempt to be fair in reporting the viewpoints and positions of those with whom they disagree? And wouldn’t it be amazing if that behavior were to spill over into political speech by candidates? What a boon for participatory government that would be!

And how about clarity? If politicians would seek to be clear, open and transparent instead of obfuscating their views with obscurantist babble and long-winded perorations and rambling perambulations designed to conceal the fact that they’re avoiding questions, people might actually listen with understanding (even appreciation! Amazing thought). Clear, unequivocal statements that lean heavily on fact and reason to persuade would be refreshing in politics, don’t you think?

And with clarity, accessibility goes hand-in-hand. If politicians were accessible, open to honest inquiry and continually aiming to make themselves available for discussion with The People, continually striving to make their policies, goals and purposes understandable instead of hiding behind doubletalk, perhaps we’d be able to have more political discussions about policy than about personality.

Expressiveness. Is anyone else besides me tired almost to death with the low quality of political speaking? Persuasive speech that depends on projecting phony emotion rather than full of genuine emotion powered by real reasons is a paper tiger. Even reading from teleprompters, it seems most contemporary politicians have the persuasive speaking ability of a doped chimp. Not pointing fingers, exactly, but when The One is held up as an example of expressive and persuasive public speaking, I begin to suspect the ones describing him so of being lobotomized and deaf.

Or perhaps it’s just that they’ve been around contemporary examples of political speech too long and have become effectively brain damaged by those examples. Could be. Rather in the manner of a public that laps up the artistic poison that is top 40 “artists'” manufactured “music” because their ears have been long dulled by exposure to similar noise.

Could it be that Sarah Palin’s convention speech electrified so many in part because it embodied at least some elements of Classical principles? My exhortation to her would be: Punch up the good stuff, Sarah. More clarity, please. Be balanced and restrained when dealing with jackasses like Charlie Gibson. Remain accessible. You need no lessons on expressiveness; just keep it up; more, please. And continue to build up (edify) our coutry, our people, by talking about what’s right about America. Proudly display the confidence that faith trumps doubt, that real hope and real change, as opposed to the phony hope n change (or is that “shuck n jive”–oops! now I’ll be accused of being a racist! My bad. *yawn*) of empty rhetoric, must come from the People.

Maybe some of it’ll rub off on the smart pols. I’ll not hold my breath, but maybe.


Trackposted to The Pink Flamingo, Phastidio.net, Wingless, Political Byline, Conservative Cat, and Stageleft, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

The Bell Curve

No, not that one (although there are strong corelations); I’m talking about the reality bell curve, where the left-hand side indicates propensity toward fantasy unrelated to reality (or “reality-based fantasy” among its most rational inhabitants) and the right-hand side indicates a propensity toward a connection with “real” reality in ones thinking. Or think of such a bell curve as left-hand side: arational; right-hand side: rational.

In such a model, the political Left/Right divide begins to make sense…

Those of us stuck in the middle can only fantasize about politics driven by reason.

<hr />

Hmmm… Harvey has another take on the issue.

Browser Fun

Between Windows, Linux and PCBSD, although I’ve pretty well standardized on Opera as my web browser of choice, I generally also have available:

Windows: Opera in various versions–currently 9.60 beta, build 10427 for the most part, although I have 9.26, 9.27 and 9.52, as well as OperaTor available on flashdrives as well. Then, of course, I have Internet Exploder (varies depending on the machine: versions 6 and 7, updated as far as possible for the machine, physical or virtual). I avoid using Internet Exploder as much as possible, but there are some Microsoft sites that choke on other browsers. FIrefox 3.X and Safari browser (don’t have the ver # at the tip of my finders) round out m y typical browser selection installed on just about every Windows machine I have. Neither sees much use, though I do like to check web pages in them from time to time. Tried out Google’s Chrome briefly. Didn’t like it enough to keep it around for a longer tryout.

Linux: All the browsers listed above (except for Chrome–it didn’t even want to play with WINE, though my Windows portable versions of Opera have no problems). Yes, I sometimes have as many as three different versions of Opera open at once just in Linux: Linux native version–currently at 9.60 Beta, build 10426–one of the portable Windows versions and Opera (Windows native) 9.60 Beta build 10427 running undere WINE. Perhaps even an instance running in a Windows VM client running on the Linux host. (Yeh, I keep ’em straight by placing toolbars in different places for the different build/versions open).

PCBSD–usually just the latest ‘nix version, although Safari runs fine under WINE and Firefox is also available.

Oh, in Linux and in PCBSD, there are also various Mozilla-based browsers built in, as it were, as default browsers, but they’re usually so crappy the first thing I do is install Opera, then whatever other browser(s) I feel I want to have available (IE usually runs as well as IE can using WINE, although I’ve not gotten IE7 installed and running on a ‘nix box).

I really try to keep an open mind toward using other browsers, but I’ve been a bit spoiled by Opera. *heh* Usually, on a fresh install of Firefox, the first time I forget and make a mouse gesture, I *arrrrgggghhh!* and then go hunt down the latest extension so I can have an almost-as-good-as-Opera implementation of mouse gestures. “Dumb,” think I (every time! *heh*). “Have to get an extension to have basic browser functionality?!?” That’s how having all the goodiest goodies built into a browser (Opera) has spoiled me. I think of the goodies built into Opera–like native mouse gestures–as “basic browser functionality”–*heh*

Palin Watch: Gibson Interview 0.02

Second part of the Gibson interview of Palin. Best response so far? From a commenter at Hot Air,

She’s so awesome. She’s like fillet mignon after two years of eating turd sandwiches.

I might have said “A breath of fresh air after two years of noxious B.S.,” but I’m happy to go with the assessment above.

Abortion: check.

Homosexuality: check.

2nd Amendment: check.

Sexism: check.

Charlie Gibson stifled: check.

What’s not to like?

GOOD LORD IN HEAVEN ABOVE!

The End Times approach. I’m looking for the Earth to shudder (well, one sure went through the Hivemind collective!), the Sun to go nova and time to end!

Why? Someone at the LA Times (the LA TIMES, folks!) noted that Charlie Gibson twisted Sarah Palin’s request for prayer:

A video [this video, folkstwc.] shows Palin asking a group to pray that the nation’s leaders were sending troops to Iraq “on a task that is from God.”

Gibson, however, mischaracterized her as simply asserting that the nation’s leaders were sending troops to Iraq on a task from God.

Next up? Surely the sea will disappear… (Revelation 21:1), pigs will fly and Satan will open Hell’s Ice Rink on the Left Coast…

It’s the End Times, I tell you folks. Running for the hills won’t help. The LA Times, of all spore collectives… The Hivemind must have the vapors.


h.t. Patterico via Malkin


Trackposted to , Rosemary’s Thoughts, Wingless, Woman Honor Thyself, and The World According to Carl, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Political Attacks II

I watch/read political attack ads, speeches and interview comments very, very carefully. They can contain useful information a candidate simply would prefer to keep hidden, after all. But when I see an attack by an Obamassiah campaign ad that features comments like the following, I look very, very carefully:

“”He admits he still doesn’t know how to use a computer, can’t send an e-mail, still doesn’t understand the economy, and favors two hundred billion in new tax cuts for corporations, but almost nothing for the middle class”

Hmmm, My dad’s 85 and is as computer literate as the average Windows user. What’s the story on McCain, I wondered. So, checking up, I found this (Thanks, Jonah Goldberg):

From the Boston Globe (March 4, 2000):

McCain gets emotional at the mention of military families needing food stamps or veterans lacking health care. The outrage comes from inside: McCain’s severe war injuries prevent him from combing his hair, typing on a keyboard, or tying his shoes. Friends marvel at McCain’s encyclopedic knowledge of sports. He’s an avid fan – Ted Williams is his hero – but he can’t raise his arm above his shoulder to throw a baseball.

(Emphasis in the material as quoted by Goldberg)

So, McCain “doesn’t know how to send an email”? Sure, I guess he could have someone set him up with a voice command system, but tell me: how easy would it be for YOU to use a computer if you couldn’t use a keyboard?

For making a scurrilous personal attack the cornerstone of his attack:

Strke one for that ad.

As for “still doesn’t understand the economy”… I’d not be throwing rocks from your glass house, were I you, Mr. Obamassiah. The kinds of central planning and control you’ve advocated for everything from energy to health care have all been done before, and the Soviets didn’t have any success, even with totalitarian control over people’s lives.

Strike two.

Tax breaks for the rich? What is the Obamassiah Campaign smoking? ALL of Obama’s tax proposals are: soak the producers and give to the drones. The tax cuts proposed (to be kept or expanded) by the McCain ticket, while falling far, far short of the benefits that would accrue with The FairTax, would nevertheless benefit all Americans. Think about it: tax cuts for corporations=lower operating costs. Those lower costs go to

–the bottom line, benefitting shareholders, among whom are nearly every non-governmental retirement fund in America, millions of individual, hard-working Americans saving and planning for their children’s college educations, to start a small business, for their own future retirements, etc.
–more capital for expanding business and creating jobs here, instead of shipping them to a more favorable tax climate
–more money for wages

And much, much more. Heck, lowering business taxes and thus spurring growth has proven to actually raise tax “income” for the government in the past (facts are stubborn things).

Who, exactly, doesn’t understand the economy and taxation? *feh* What a maroon.

Strike three, this ad’s out!


Abortionists Worry About the “Palin Effect”?

“”Never stop a man who’s commiting suicide with the jawbone of an ass.”

Question: Can leftists really be this stupid and tone deaf?

Sarah and Todd Palin’s decision to complete her recent pregnancy, despite advance notice that their baby Trig had Down syndrome, is hailed by many in the pro-life movement as walking the walk as well as talking the talk.

But a senior Canadian doctor is now expressing concerns that such a prominent public role model as the governor of Alaska and potential vice president of the United States completing a Down syndrome pregnancy may prompt other women to make the same decision against abortion because of that genetic abnormality. And thereby reduce the number of abortions.

While the answer to my question is obviously, “Yes!” I’d advise you click on over to read the whole thing. See for yourself just how stupid and tone deaf leftists can be.

Once again,

“Never stop a man who’s commiting suicide with the jawbone of an ass.”

Yep. That applies as well to the Hivemind.

UPDATE: The LA Times post referenced above is now missing, but you can just RIGHT CLICK on the image below and open to see a sreencap of it:

h.t. Hugh Hewitt

More Lies, Damned Lies and Mass Media Podpeople Hivemind “Trutherism”

Let’s let this post begin with some Begala (rhymes with “Big Caca”):

I was in the middle of a Neil Armstrong Moment when I was on CNN Tuesday morning. Rather than let McCain and Palin get away with their lie, anchor John Roberts played a videotape of Sarah Palin in a 2006 gubernatorial debate in which she endorsed the bridge from Ketchikan to Gravina Island saying, “I’m not going to stand in the way of progress that our congressional delegation and the position of strength that they have right now.” Perhaps her supporters, noting Palin’s support for banning books, teaching creationism and doubting global warming will argue that for her, calling the bridge “progress” was her way of saying she was against it.)

Full stop. Would that be the “anchor John Roberts” who recently “slipped and said ‘we’ when asking [Begala] how Democrats should respond to Republican attacks”? Well, obvious bias aside, what’s the substance of Begala’s attack? As to the Bridge to Nowhere, see my previous post today, Mr. Begala (he won’t, of course. Its substance–Jim DeMint’s article–is in the Evil Wall Street Journal, the reading of which no doubt gives Begala a rash).

See also a 2007 Associated Press report and the Alaska Democratic Party(!) website.

*blowing raspberry at Begala*

The banning books lie? Read this and weep, Mr. Begala. (note: the link is to a pdf) The first paragraph of the linked document suffices to demonstrate that Begala is a liar or a fool:

We at the City of Wasilla have received many emails and requests for information about “banned or censured” books at the Wasilla Library while former Mayor Palin was in office. We have no records of any books being “banned or censured” ever.

The emphasis is in the original.

And what of Biggaliah’s assertion that Palin supports “teaching creationism”? First, by simply and baldly stating a very genral assertion of contrafactual “trutherism” Begala is simply attempting to bias his readers’ perceptions of Palin as a whole. Second, by doing so, he’s attempting to impeach any arguments refuting his earlier assertion with this disingenuous, subtle ad hominem attack. But for anyone willing to do 30 seconds (or less) of fact checking, OK, maybe 45 seconds for a slow reader following up on footnotes giving actual sources, the “Palin wants radical fundie nutjobs teaching superstition in schools” meme falls flat.

Palin has not pushed for teaching creationism in Alaska’s schools. She has said that students should be allowed to “debate both sides” of the evolution question, but she also said creationism “doesn’t have to be part of the curriculum.”

As to doubting global warming *sigh*. From Begala’s other bloviations, one gathers he means anthropogenic global warming as opposed to heliogenic global warming. *heh* That being the fair assumption based on Begala’s consistent stance, one can only respond to his assertion that Palin is a “global warming denier” (or at least dounter) with a big fat, “So? So she’s rational and you’re not. That’s a crime?”

*heh*

What. A. Maroon.


Trackposted to Diary of the Mad Pigeon, , Right Truth, The World According to Carl, The Pink Flamingo, Cao’s Blog, Democrat=Socialist, CORSARI D’ITALIA, and Pursuing Holiness, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

The less than 30 seconds it took me to read the “analysis” at Factcheck.org and click through to a primary source (Palin has not pushed creation science as governor,” Alaska Daily News–Dan Joling, with references aplenty) would have served Begala well, had he any desire for truth–or even to NOT appear to be an idiot.

Jim DeMint: “Yes, Palin Did Stop That Bridge”

Just read it.

Emphasis added:

“Yes, she once supported the project: But after witnessing the problems created by earmarks for her state and for the nation’s budget, she did what others like me have done: She changed her position and saved taxpayers millions. Even the Alaska Democratic Party credits her with killing the bridge.

“When the Senate had its chance to stop the Bridge to Nowhere and transfer the money to Katrina rebuilding, Messrs. Obama and Biden voted for the $223 million earmark, siding with the old boys’ club in the Senate. And to date, they still have not publicly renounced their support for the infamous earmark.”

Enough said.