Day: September 14, 2006

“Now there abide these three: phonemes, syntax and semantics; but the greatest of these is semantics.”

Still, phonemes and syntax are important. So this lil mini-rant touches on all three…

Drive-by Rant: ON

Not that these are gripping gripes for most folks, but does the constant pejoration of English get to anyone else the way it does me?

For example, can anyone explain to me why folks use the word “terror” (“intense, sharp, overmastering fear”) instead of “terrorism” (“the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.”) when talking about the acts of Izlamic savages, nowadays? When (and how) did that lil piece of stupidity get started? And who started it? I’d like to know, because Dr. Tarr and Mr. Fether are awaiting an introduction to that particular troglodyte.

Or how about a simpler, less blatant (to most) example of linguistic stupidity?

“There’s reasons why Osama bin Laden is still at large.”

Every time I hear some Mass Media Podperson—supposed to be professional wordsmiths, conversant in the English language—or any other person for that matter, use that fav construction of subliterate morons I want to get out a hemp necktie and get ’em measured for their tree party.

Dumbasses. “Reasons” in that sentence is plural. “There are reasons…” so it’d be “There’re reasons… ” A tongue twister, you say? Suck it up. People who’d say “there’s” when “there’re is appropriate would probably say “Feb-YOU-ary” for “February”… another inexcusable mallocution.

Heck, why get all bent outa shape about illegal aliens (or even legal ones) not learning to speak English when it seems 90% of Americans born here can’t speak—or write or read, let alone understand—the language, either?

Rant: OFF

…mostly

N.B. Is my use of the English language always grammatically perfect? No. But there’s a “but” there (note the proper use of “there’s”). Fracturing the English language ought only to be done by those who know what they’re doing (note the proper use of “they’re” instead of the common written dumbass usages, “their” and “there”–those who don’t know the differences between common homophones, are illiterate). *heh* Arrrrgggg! Just another reason why 99% of the Mass Media Podpeople, Academia Nut Fruitcakes and politicians *spit* should simply STFU.

NOW the rant is off… But have no fear; there’re (there ARE) more rants to come.

A couple of excerpts from Jerry Pournelle’s Chaos Manor Musings (Mail) and an invitation to talk about this among yourselves for a while. I’ll chime in (referring to this post) another time…

From Harry Erwin, an university instructor in England:

There is a recent Scientific American article (August 2006) on expertise that suggests what we should do for our students is motivate them to continuously push themselves beyond their current levels of ability and then provide accurate feedback on their performance. I did that this summer with some of my programming students, and their performance was *much* improved. So perhaps the problem in education is not with the students, but rather with the approach to teaching–an interesting implication for the current high- stakes testing regime in the schools–it might be wrong-headed. The SA article also suggests that the differences in talent and intelligence between students are much less important than the differences in motivation. So when your goal is to educate experts, don’t worry about their raw talent and IQ, but instead keep them pushing their limits…

Pournelle rersponded, in part, with:

[T]hat experience exactly matches not only my own experience, but that of most of my generation. Being pushed to just beyond one’s limit is apparently the best way to learn almost anything; and the experience that motivation can be as important as intelligence is very much in line with the work of Marva Collins and some of the other inner city teachers…

Any thoughts?