Tag: stupid is as stupid does

My open post today included a request for suggestions on how to deal with new neighbors who don’t know how to pee on the paper…

JimmyK came up with the best line of suggestions so far…

1. Got any friends who are Hell’s Angels?
2. Borrow 2 coon dogs for the week end.
3. Call the ACLU and tell them there is a church meeting going on at the house.
4. Call Cindy Sheehan and tell her the media will be at the party.

Now, that’s what I’m talkin’ about! More, please!

🙂

This is an open trackbacks post. Link to this post and track back. More below the “Hey rube!”

---

OK, the downside of living in America’s Third World Countyâ„¢. *sigh*

For the past eleven years, we’ve lived in a very quiet neighborhood in a small town in America’s Third World Countyâ„¢ where the loudest disturbances have been dogs barking at invading wildlife, the occasional sound of hunters over the hill (maybe a quarter mile off and well over a hill) during deer season and the mostly distant sound of the trains passing through, which everyone in town hears.

None of this is a patch on city traffic, C-130s doing touch-and-gos and MLRS launches that were common where we moved from (heck, some of the missle launches weren’t a patch on the artillary range impacts which could be heard miles away).

But recently, here in our quiet cul de sac, we’ve had to consider dealing with a different set of noises. Some young 20-somethings were able to swing financing the house our good neighbor moved out of a few years after losing his wife to cancer (a long story there). They got it for a song—not a patch on what our former neighbor had paid (some problems with a city right-of-way had forced demo-ing a portion of the house *sigh*), but still… Yeh, seem like nice kids, but…

…it’s been a while, a pretty good long while (back when we bought and began rennovating a bungalow in “the better part of the ghetto” in KCMO when we were just newlywed pups), since we’ve had to put up with loud, drunken parties late on Saturday night/early Sunday mornings—or at any time, for that matter. Heck, they have a nice back yard, so why do they have to congregate and do their loud, drunken hootin’ andf hollerin’ in their front yard, just a bit away from our bedroom windows?

OK, I’ve stifled my natural tendencies, and all of our neighbors and their drunken friends are still alive and unmarked (by me, at least). And my blood pressure isn’t all that bad right now, either.

But.

Before I TAKE STEPS, I thought I’d solicit the considered thoughts of readers here: what helpful hints (beyond buying/renting/building a “Sonic Laser” *heh*) would you suggest for dealing with these drunks?

Comments (or even whole posts tracked back to this one) welcome.

---

As I said, this is an open trackback post. Link to this post and track back.

Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at Linkfest Haven.

Today’s Guard the Borders post is from Rahel B. Avraham of CustomerServant.com. While I posted on “The Pachuco Hymn” last week, it warrants repeating. All I’ll add to Rahel’s post is a small edit adding an mp3 file so you can sing along with the REAL National Anthem, if you wish, since she includes the lyrics to the REAL thing below the vile abortion of the Alien Invaders’ Anthem. Oh, and an added emphasis to words in our REAL national Anthem that cause faux liberals to choke on their own bile…

Blest with vict’ry and peace, may the heaven-rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation.
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: “In God is our trust.”

---

Nuestro Himno: Is It Really “Our Anthem?”
By Rahel B. Avraham of CustomerServant

The pro-illegal immigration folks now have their own campaign song. It’s called “Nuestro Himno,” (our anthem), and it’s peddlers say it’s just a re-interpretation of our national anthem, “The Star-spangled Banner.” Let’s see if that claim actually holds water.

First, an English translation of “Nuestro Himno.”

Verse 1

It’s sunrise. Do you see by the light of the dawn
What we proudly hailed last nightfall?
Its stars, its stripes
yesterday streamed
above fierce combat
a symbol of victory
the glory of battle, the march toward liberty.
Throughout the night, they proclaimed: “We will defend it!”

Chorus

Tell me! Does its starry beauty still wave
above the land of the free,
the sacred flag?

Chant:

It’s time to make a difference the kids, men and the women
Let’s stand for our beliefs, let’s stand for our vision/What about the children, los ninos ?

These kids have no parents, cause all of these mean laws.
See this can’t happen, not only about the Latins.
Asians, blacks and whites and all they do is adding
more and more, let’s not start a war
with all these hard workers,
they can’t help where they were born.

Verse 2

Its stars, its stripes,
Liberty, we are the same.
We are brothers in our anthem.
In fierce combat, a symbol of victory
the glory of battle,
(My people fight on)
the march toward liberty.
(The time has come to break the chains.)
Throughout the night they proclaimed: “We will defend it!”
Tell me! Does its starry beauty still wave
above the land of the free,
the sacred flag?

And now, to put things in perspective, the lyrics to “The Star-spangled Banner.”

The Defense of Fort McHenry
September 20, 1814
By Francis Scott Key

Oh, say can you see, by the dawn’s early light,
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight’s last gleaming?
Whose broad stripes and bright stars, through the perilous fight,
O’er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming?
And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there.
O say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave?

On the shore, dimly seen through the mists of the deep,
Where the foe’s haughty host in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the breeze, o’er the towering steep,
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of the morning’s first beam,
In full glory reflected now shines on the stream:
‘Tis the star-spangled banner! O long may it wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle’s confusion
A home and a country should leave us no more?
Their blood has wiped out their foul footstep’s pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave:
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

Oh! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved homes and the war’s desolation!
Blest with vict’ry and peace, may the heaven-rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation.
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: “In God is our trust.”
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

As you can see, there’s very little similarity between these two pieces, and that’s just scratching the surface. The fact is “Nuestro Himno” is not a simple translation of our national anthem into Spanish. It’s an attempt to take what is now a very familiar tune, which carries with it very vivid associations for some of us, and slap a pro-invader anthem on top of it.

The Star-spangled Banner was written in response, to a real life-or-death battle. If we had lost that part of the war of 1812, we’d be British subjects. On the other hand, this new cheap imitation that wants so desperately to be our national anthem is a plea for acceptance on behalf of those who have broken the laws of this country, and yet want to be forgiven for their trespass without paying any penalty.

“We know we’ve broken your laws, but can we have some of your hard-earned liberty anyway? After all, we’re brothers. And if you don’t give us some of your freedoms and rights, more than we already have, we say that your flag no longer flies over the land of the free and the home of the brave, because we’re in this land, and we’re not free, and though we were brave enough to cross through Central America and Mexico to sneak across the border, you don’t call us brave. But we are brave! We sneaked past your border guards, and we believe we can halt your economy in one day, and we don’t care if you give us free schooling, government subsidies for every baby born in this country. We’ll wave Mexican flags, and even cover your flag with ours, and we’ll even claim that your entire southwest region is ours and we’re going to take it back, but all the same, we want you to accept us as perfectly legal.”

This, at least, is how I interpret this anthem’s message.

And some record company’s CEO has ingeniously figured out how to cash in in a big way on the immigration fight going on in this country. By asking that “Nuestro Himno” be played simultaneously on Latino radio stations yesterday, and marketing it as simply a re-interpretation of the national anthem that will allow Hispanics who don’t speak English to understand what they’re singing, that CEO stands to make a huge amount of cash, and gain himself a lot of publicity.

If anyone is really interested in understanding what the national anthem’s lyrics mean, they could very easily have the lyrics translated in non-poetic form. But this is poetic license gone horribly wrong. And the national anthem isn’t copyrighted, so no one has to pay any royalties. No record producer could have missed that.

To conclude, I would answer the question I posed in this way. “Nuestro Himno” is a shining example of criminality and greed. Nothing more.

---

This has been a production of the Guard the Borders Blogburst. It was started by Euphoric Reality, and serves to keep immigration issues in the forefront of our minds as we’re going about our daily lives and continuing to fight the war on terror. If you are concerned with the trend of illegal immigration facing our country, join our Blogburst! Just send an email with your blog name and url to euphoricrealitynet at gmail dot com.

Well, today’s my Wonder Woman’s birthday anniversary, so this is “pre-posted” and I’m mostly “offline” until the day is done. Just thought that while I’m out for a while on Saturday, I’d leave this lil “mending walls” thought with you…

Central planning and other pillars of the kakistocratic “progressives” is working well, worldwide. *cough* Yeh, well, the principles of self-proclaimed “progressives” (formerly claiming—falsely—to be liberals but really just closet—or not—communists) is working very well… at providing us with very good bad examples, warnings of what NOT to do.

Take Zimbabwe as an argumentum ad absurdum against the communist agenda now calling itself “progressives”. Yeh, yeh, that’s generally a fallacy of reasoning, but when such a sterling example of the outcome of kakistocratic kleptocrats exists, why not hold it up as a warning?

For those of y’all who may have missed it in history/geography/whatever-they-call-it today in school, Zimbabwe was once Rhodesia, arguably the most prosperous and productive country in Africa. Britain ceded colonial rule, turned it over to the indigenous peoples, and the world has watched as typically kleptovratic rule veneered with typical progressive/communist platitudes turned Rhodesia into Zombabwe, one of the most pathetic excuses for a country on the face of the globe today.

That’s a picture of a Zimbabwe $20 bill. It’s no longer in circulation, because of the rampant inflation in Zimbabwe. Consider this lil tidbit from an April 25 NYT article:

How bad is inflation in Zimbabwe? Well, consider this: at a supermarket near the center of this tatterdemalion capital, toilet paper costs $417.

No, not per roll. Four hundred seventeen Zimbabwean dollars is the value of a single two-ply sheet. A roll costs $145,750 in American currency, about 69 cents.

The price of toilet paper, like everything else here, soars almost daily, spawning jokes about an impending better use for Zimbabwe’s $500 bill, now the smallest in circulation.

Oops. That information’s hopelessly outdated. The $500 bill is no longer the smallest in circulation, because it’s being withdrawn. After all, it’s only worth about one swaure of toilet tiissue.

So, anyone left with old Zimbabwe $20s really is better off using them as toilet paper…

Or to light dung fires to cook their food. Hmmm… maybe the dung is worth more…

Thanks for being such a good bad example, Zimbabwe!

Next time you meet a “progressive” (code name for communist, formerly a so-called liberal), Tell him/her you’d be happy to give ’em $1,500,000 to move to Zimbabwe. Just don’t tell ’em it’d be in Zimbabwean currency. (Heck, at about $7.00 a pop, American, I’d be happy to pay a few to leave the country, myself.) Get any takers, it’d at least move another barbarian outside the walls… *heh*

And maybe later I’ll have time to play Whack-a-Mole at TMH’s Bacon Bits (though I’d still rather whack a commie-fag-junkie—”Workerth of the World Unite… and accessorize!” [with apologies to Geirge Carlin… sorta]).

This post is an open trackback post all weekend. Link to this post and track back. More info below.

---

Short shrift day. I hope to have time to either update this post or post newer material later. Meanwhile, check out my Regular Reads blogroll. Start anywhere. They’re all good.

---

Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at Linkfest Haven.

From John Stephenson at Stop the ACLU:

---

Via WND

Ruling on a 15-year-old ACLU case, a federal judge today ordered the city of San Diego to remove a mountain-top cross within 90 days or face a fine of $5,000 a day. U.S. District Judge Gordon Thompson said, “It is now time, and perhaps long overdue, for this court to enforce its initial permanent injunction forbidding the presence of the Mount Soledad cross on city property,” the San Diego Union-Tribune reported. Thompson ruled in 1991 the Mount Soledad cross violates the so-called “separation of church and state” but the case has remained in courts and become an issue of public policy for more than a decade. ACLU lawyer James McElroy believes San Diego officials finally will give up their fight. “I don’t think the city has its heart in taking more action,” he said, according to the paper. A city lawyer argued during the hour-long court hearing today that citizens had voted for transfer of the land under the cross. Proposition A, passed by 75 percent in July, called for the city to donate the cross to the federal government as the centerpiece of a veterans memorial. The ballot initiative came about after the city refused to donate the cross and memorial to the federal government. A group called San Diegans for the Mount Soledad National War Memorial took just 23 days to gather 105,000 signatures. In a ruling now on appeal, however, a Superior Court judge found the transfer unconstitutional. The Union-Tribune said the group behind the public vote on transfer likely will appeal Thompson’s decision. The 29-foot cross has stood on Mount Soledad as the center of a war memorial on city land since 1954. The first cross on the site was built in 1913. A bill authorizing the federal government to take over the memorial was authored by Republican U.S. Reps. Duncan Hunter and Randy Cunningham. President Bush signed the bill into law in December.

The ACLU are constantly seeking to censor America’s history. In my interview with former ACLU lawyer, Rees Lloyd, it was described to me with clarity. Lloyd said:
Continue reading “Stop the ACLU Blogburst”

Many of the problems facing the U.S. today—public misinfornmation about immigration, the economy, energy, to name a few—can largely be laid at the feet of our modern prisons for kids (also called by those who know or little care, “public education”). The Random Yak spotlights a minor area of miseducation that implies volumes about the rest of “education” in our modern prisons for kids in his piece at The real Ugly American, “Average geographic literacy…makes me ill.”

…an interesting new study being reported this week shows that nearly 1/3 of young Americans polled cannot find Louisiana or Mississippi on a map.

That’s a labeled map.

Of the United States.

Now, that’s surprising. What’s surpriseing to me is that 2/3 could find Louisiana and Mississippi. After all, recent college graduates didn’t fare that well comprehending the contents of newspaper editorials. According to a recent survey (see here as well) half of college grads can sound or puzzle out words, but are clueless when it comes to comprehending the content of a newspaper editorial.

Where did the walls start to fall in public schools, allowing the barbarians (educrats, Academia Nuts and the generally clueless, lazy and incompetent) take over the show? Much as I hate to admit it, the worst breach in the walls came when Dwight Eisenhower sent in the troops to enforce desegregation. Laudable as the goal was, letting the federal camel in to poop on the rug was a bad idea.

And things have gotten steadily worse ever since.

Or does anyone want to argue that despite doubling spending per pupil (in real dollars adjusted for inflation) in the last thirty years that the “product” of that spending is NOT less well-informed and able to gather and understand information than previously?

If there are folks who want to attempt that argument, may I once again refer you to The Random Yak’s short disquisition on geographic illiteracy?

“If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.”—A Nation At Risk – April 1983

What to do?

Now that the barbarians are on the inside, as it were, and have built the walls back up to protect what is now their turf, what shall we do to build proper walls around the education system for future generations of Americans? (Well, I hope there’s time to provide for future generations of Americans, rather than simply succomb to invasion and become “Aztlanians” or full-fledged Dhimmis. *sigh*)

First, tear down the wall!

Breach the educrappic wall with freedom of choice. The problem was created politically; fix it politically by pressuring your congresscritters, state reps and local pols to accept and implement a voucher system so that parents—all parents, not just the rich, the politically well-connected, etc.—will have a real choice about where their children attend school. Sure, some will stick with pubschool prisons for kids for a variety of reasons—stupidity, laziness, lack of caring for their childrem and even in some very rare cases because the local pubschool is pretty decent.

But enough will vote with their feet to create a breach in the wall.

After that, it’s up to the parents to assure that their children excel*. If—IF—the next generation really does achieve a level of education that dwarfs the pitiful experience of their parents, then maybe, just maybe, it’ll be a little harder for Mass Media Podpeople, Academia Nuts and Political Poltroons to continue pulling the wool over their eyes.

And this dream can happen. Unless… unless a coupla things work together in poisonous synergy: a desire among Mass Media Podpeople, Academia Nut “education” professors and Political Poltroons to keep the masses stupid (thus protecting the turfs of these scum) and… laziness, compounded by wilfull stupidity and ignorance, among the masses.

Lil test question: What book have you read recently that is mentally stimulating, challenging and informative? did you simply accept its message/contents uncritically, or did you challenge and affirm or deny its contents by your own digging into the background facts?

X-Posted at The Real Ugly American.

This is an Open Trackback Alliance Post. Link to this post and track back. See the foot of the post for more information.

---

Well, it’s finally happened. We’ve received a dissenting opinion about the validity of the FairTax.

In the interests of fairness, we will publish this video post in the hope that it will stimulate debate. It was sent in by Cao of Cao’s blog (who is getting way too good at these video posts, to my way of thinking).

Funny, I thought she supported the FairTax. Well, you can make your own decision about that, I suppose. At any rate, we do want to give Cao full credit for this week’s video post, and encourage readers to visit this blog next week for part 2 of her (dare I call it “unhinged”?) rant against the FairTax.

Thanks, Cao, for making us think!

The FairTax Blogburst is jointly produced by Terry of The Right Track Blog and Jonathan of Publius Rendezvous. If you would like to join us, please e-mail Terry or Jonathan. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll.

---

As I said at the head, this is an open trackback post.

Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at Linkfest Haven.

Breaking the (piggy) bank at TMH’s Bacon Bits and remembering Horace Greely at Blue Star Chronicles.

Open Post for May 2. Link to this post and track back. More info below the “point to ponder”…

---

Just a small point to ponder:

Gleaned from “LawS: Know TheM,” at Woman Honor Thyself,

Title 8:
Section 1325. Improper entry by alien
(a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts
Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers,
or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers,
or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

Hmmm… seems as though the common understanding that only three of the 9-11 hijackers were in the country illegally is false. None of the others revealed on their visa apps that the purpose of their stay was to “fly planes into buildings causing the deaths of thousands of non-combatants” in their self-declared (though not on their visa apps) war on the U.S.

So ALL of them were illegal aliens. That goes a long way toward explaining why so many progressives” are so hot to have more illegals in country, eh?

Still waiting on further word from Ward Churchill.

Be sure and press this point every time you meet an “Open Borders” advocate. You’ll likely have a chance to witness what “gobsmacked” means firsthand.*

---

As I said above, this is an open post. Link to this post and track back.

Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at Linkfest Haven.

Continue reading “Gobsmacked, any?/Tuesday Open Post”