Oh, David…

Because I am the sick, twisted, and bizarre person God has made me (THANK You, Lord, LOLOL), I have promised a quilt to David and his Lady Wife.

I requested a general color preference, and David’s Lady granted that she likes sage green and creams, with other accents, and so I offer – through God’s rich grace and Providence – a kit I bought two years ago (Oh, yeah, yet another chance to reduve my “stash” — so I can buy MOREMOREMORE!).

David, here are the colors – and make sure your Lady isn’t completely nauseated by them, OK?

Continue reading “Oh, David…”

Principles of Classicism

Bear with me for a bit. This is all about why I’m a fan of classical (though especially Classical–the lowercase “c” is different) music. It’s not (exactly) what you may think. At least, not entirely.

In music, the term Classic Period refers to a period from roughly the middle of the 18th Century into (and perhaps a little beyond) the first decade of the 19th Century during which certain “givens” of musical expression were practiced and the major forms of most of what is viewed as “classical” music were developed. Do note: in architecture, the graphic arts and the like, the period is more likely to be called Neoclassicism.

(That darned lowercase–or uncial–c”. *heh* So “Classical Music” is NOT what most folks think of when “classical music” is referenced… )

One of the primary reasons I am a fan of Classical (and even much classical) music is not just because the music is complex, beautiful and compelling but because it is the expression of a particular ethos which our society sorely lacks nowadays.

Aside from technical matters of form, the principles of Classicism as found in Classical Music were

  • balance
  • clarity
  • accessibility
  • expressiveness
  • edification

Although two of these principles are still found in abundance in contemporary music (though not in contemporary “serious” or “academic” music, IMO) it is the lack of the others, especially the last, that has seriously harmful effects upon our society. Continue reading “Principles of Classicism”

Warning to Safari Users

This article at SANS Internet Storm Center warns that

…a serious vulnerability has been found in Apple Safari on OS X. “In its default configuration shell commands are execute[d] simply by visting a web site – no user interaction required.” This could be really bad. Attackers can run shell scripts on your computer remotely just by visiting a malicious website.

You’ve been warned. Be careful out there.

PSA’d at Conservative Cat

Income Tax=Incremental Slavery

While inferring the “strained” Southern argument for apportionment in Federalist #54, James Madison outlines three criteria applicable to slaves:

In being compelled to labor, not for himself, but for a master; in being vendible by one master to another master; and in being subject at all times to be restrained in his liberty and chastised in his body, by the capricious will of another — the slave may appear to be degraded from the human rank…

Hmmm… two out of the three chracteristics of slavery seem adequately fulfilled by our present income taxes. Who has first claim on your labor? Who can put you in prison or otherwise “chastise [your] body” for failing to give your labor FIRST in its service? That you are not—yet—”vendible” by this master is the only manner in which income taxation fails the benchmarks of slavery mentioned by Madison.

Ironic that the first successful efforts to implement both the incremental involuntary servitude of income taxation and the absolute involuntary servitude of compulsory military service were implemented by… Abraham Lincoln.

Both income taxation and compulsory military service were eschewed by the Founders in their Constitutional deliberations for very good reasons. Among them, concerning taxation, is something very like what we have today in our inconcievably large (in the Founders’ day) Republic with a nearly universal suffrage—specifically avoided by the Framers!—which has resulted in a set of circumstances the Framers wished ardently to avoid (read Madison’s exposition in Federalist #10). As Scott Johnson and John Hinderaker wrote for The Claremont Institute in 2002 in Regressive Thoughts on a Progressive Tax, citing the Founders views,

“Given the fact that the poor everywhere outnumber the rich, political philosophy had held that a government based on majority rule was likely to lead to the misappropriation of the property of the few rich by the many poor.”

/sarcasm/ No, really?

*sigh*

We do not have the Founders’ Republic any more. Don’t believe me? Just read the Constitution, really read it. It’s a relatively short document—kinda long for a blogpost *s*, but still relatively short—written in fairly simple terms.

Here’s an idea: how about pressuring your congresscritters for a return to at least a shadow of the Republic the Founders envisioned by ditching the abhorrent income tax?

It’s doable, folks. For a start:

The FairTax.

Wednesday OTA/Ping Pong

[Wednesday Open Trackback Alliance Open Post. Link here and trackback. See the info below.]

PingPong: All links and tbs welcome, BUT posts linking with tips on pinging Technorati, Del.icio, Furl, Spurl or any other search/index service will be featured in a later roundup.

See the OTA participants at the link above or become an OTA member here:

Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at

Linkfest Haven.Linkfest Haven

Served with a backspin at Freedom Watch