The carefully concieved rape of the American public

It’s not really about $70 per barrel oil. Not really.

Was just filling Lovely Daughter’s car (her first week on her new job: notalotta spare cash hangin’ around her bank account) and the talk at the pumps was, of course, about gas prices, oil, etc.  I just knew I was gonna blog about this…

It’s not really just about oil. It’s about energy policy as a whole. Gasoline and diesel fuels have made sense for a long time, because oil is relatively plentiful, and may be even more plentiful than conventional wisdom has thought for years. So why the apparent shortages—or fear of shortages—driving oil prices and gasoline/diesel prices higher and higher?

“Why” doesn’t resolve into one simple reason. The Saudis and their ilk do need higher prices, not just because they need to make up for monies spent supporting Islamofascist butchers (although that does play a small part in their apparent greed); they also need as much as the market will bear because that’s the only thing they have, apart from generally subliterate mouths to feed and water and a religion of hate to export. Well, unless they find a larger market for their other great natural resource, but there’s just not that huge a market on sand.  Besides, sand’s available worldwide cheaply, anyway.

No, aside from so much of our foreign oil coming from essentially one-product countries, there’s the false upward pressure created by artificially limiting oil production here at home. And here’s where I count strike one against eco-freaks in energy policy. We have more than enough known, and relatively easily developed, oil deposits here at home to supply most, if not all, of our needs for the present and immediate-to-moderately long term needs.  But an unholy alliance of eco-freaks, media asshat know-nothings and (mostly) liberalist political grandstanders have effectively shut that option down for years.

But still, even with those pressures, gas prices haven’t reflected as much of the upward oil cost pressure as they might have because refinery capacity has been able to just barely keep up with demands.  Barely, in spite of the fact that the same unholy alliance of eco-freaks, media asshat know-nothings and (mostly) liberalist political grandstanders (aided by stupidly selfish NIMBYs) have managed to keep any new refineries from being built in the U.S. for nearly 30 years.  And the same short-sighted dimwits have had pretty much the same effect on distribution systems as well.

Strike two for the eco-freaks and their ilk.

Then there’s the asinine, stupid buncha eco-freaks (along with the rest of the luddite cabal) who have managed to keep ANY new nuclear power plants from being built in the U.S. for the last thirty years. Think about it.  While the U.S. has continued to produce a large portion—if not the majority—of its electricity via oil, natural gas or coal (using steam generators, for the most part), more forward-looking countries such as China are building such things as pebble bed reactors by the dozens. (China plans to have 30 or so of the things in use by 2020—enough to meet its own needs and sell power to adjacent countries.) Cluebat: pebble bed reactors are arguably just about the safest, cleanest means available of producing large amounts of electricity economically. China’s no industrial powerhouse and China’s doing it right now. Cheaply.

But economically and safely lessening—or eliminating!—our need for petroleum products for use in electricity generation (even though it would greatly lower airborne pollutants) is anathema to eco-freaks who are apparently genetically unable to listen to facts. So, much of oil production is sucked up into your air conditioning (watch your electric bill soar) and refinery production goes to keep the lights burning, “helping” maintain $3 per gallon prices for gasoline…

But the luddite cabal’s evil work accomplishes more than that. Heck.  Wanna virtually eliminate vehicular air pollution? Burn hydrogen. Oh, but there’s the technical hurdle of containing this fractious gas safely. Done.  That’s just an engineering problem, which is something we have the technical horsepower to handle. Sure, the hydrogen molecules that’d be used for fuel are smaller than the propane molecules that’ve been used in vehicles for 50 years or more, but like I said: that’s just an engineering problem.

No, cars can be built and distribution systems maintained for hydrogen use for cars. But production… gee, ya have to have electricity to crack water to get the hydrogen! Oh! Pebble bed reactors! D’oh!

But eco freaks (and their unholy allies) don’t really want people driving SUVs that produce water vapor as a “pollutant”.  If they did, they’d get outa the way!

*sheesh*

Phasing out most gas burners and phasing in hydrogen burners (or full electric or hydrogen fuel cell or any number of other options) would be easily possible if

  • The Luddite Alliance of eco-freaks, media asshat know-nothings and (mostly) liberalist political grandstanders could be shouted down by genuine progressives.
  • Crash production of the Alaskan (and other) oil assets put in play
  • New refineries built

To transition to

  • 50-100 pebble bed reactors built in next 10-15 years
  • electric, fuel cell and hydrogen-burning autos and trucks put in production as the electricity production makes such alternatives economically and conveniently available

And that’s just one within-reach scenario.  Want to turn waste into petroleum? It’s being done economically right now in a small way in Carthage, Missouri.  Daily.

Want REAL solar power? If NASA and the Luddite Cabal could be sent to make gardens on the moon (nice quiet gardens, full of lovely, lovely vacuum), we could have solar power beamed as microwaves to earth collection stations. Cheaper than knocking off Saudi Arabia (though not as satisfying).

Could do it now.  But watch.  Mass Media Podpeople will (continue to) pin the blame for the results of 30+ years of congresscritters and administrations bowing to the wishes of Mass Media Podpeople and the other Luddite Cabal members’ wishes.

Phonies, liars and moonbats, Oh my!

Pay your $3 per gallon at the pump, folks. And thank the Luddite Cabal when you do so.

Katrina Relief Blogburst, et al

Katrina Relief

Received this from RomeoCat via email.  Check out her blog for more info on relief efforts by  bloggers, ‘K?

“…as my own personal fund-raiser for the Hurricane, I’m donating $5 for every comment on this week’s recipe to Red Cross, and $5 from the Hurricane Relief post to Soldiers’ Angels, if you want to let your readers know…”


Here’s another disaster relief effort I can recommend.  Know some of the folks and a lot of the background. More $$ get to the people via this route (augmented by lots of volunteers on the ground!) than just about any other I know of.

And Basil’s Blog has a meta-roundup (includes others’ roundups) of Katrina relief efforts, too. Good resource. And stick around to read other posts there, why dontcha?

Instapundo Delenda Est!

(Yeh, I have NO idea if the Latin’s correct. Latin scholars the world over shudder when I attempt a phrase… 🙂

Delinking Instapundit?  Heresy! *heh*

For anyone who surfs a little off my blogroll (and from some of the blogrolls on email correspondents’ blogs, there are a few, maybe more than I know of), you may notice I’ve delinked Glenn Reynolds’ Instapundit blog. Yeh, well, I don’t delink often—it’s one reason my blogroll’s getting to be nearly impossible for me to surf through in a day—but when I do it’s for one of a very few reasons. A blogger may just seem to have less and less relevance; quality may take a nose dive and stay down; stops blogging, so nothing new to read; stops making sense.

Glenn’s recently touched on a few of these. His linkfest approach is less useful now that NIF and others are doing it in a more entertaining way with sometimes more relevant material. Betsy Newmark, for one, does a better job of extracting interesting nuggets and appending often pithy commentary. Michelle Malkin does a much better job of pointing to critical issues of the day, with much better commentary.

So, I’d been visiting Instapundit less and less often until last month, I notice, I only dropped in once.

And then… I clicked the link found here and read Glenn’s mini-rant in support of the ACLU. *sigh* Yeh, yeh, Glenn, the ACLU has done some good things.  But so?  Even a mass murderer like Hitler can love a dog. Oh! Dear! Did I just draw a comparison between Hitler and the ACLU? Well, there are some few points of congruency between Hitler’s tactics and views and those of the ACLU. For one, their hostility to any practice of Christianity. Both had/have no problem with Christians who don’t act like Christians.  But when the church actually adheres to biblical principles, the ACLU is as virulently opposed to Christianity as Hitler was when Christians acted like they took biblical precepts seriously. Democracy? Hitler despised majority rule (his party never gained more than 40% in an open election) as much as the ACLU, which does all its “legislating” via the courts,  does.

Yeh, there are differences. Hitler had more “success”  promoting his anti-Jewish program.   The ACLU has had to simply work to promote Islamic terrorism (which as a major anti-Jewish element is as good as they can get away with for now, I suppose). The few other differences of substance, I’ll leave aside for now. I’ll also leave the other similarities to the reader to work out.

But Hitler did some good work didn’t he? Yep.  Promoted youth programs. (Come, learn how to bust heads and inform on your Jewish neighbors!) Helped the German economy. (Get those gold fillings! The Fatherland needs them.) etc.

Is this a little over the top?  Well, take it as a meta-commentary on Glenn Reynolds’ mini-rant deriding those who find the ACLU’s success in promoting its communist agenda offensive (there’s an ideological difference to Hitler’s style of fascism for you :-).

Glenn, ya shoulda taken a lesson from Spiderman: “With great power comes great responsibility.”  Heh. Indeed.  (I dunno: was it Spiderman or “Kung Fu Hustle”? 😉

Buh-bye, Glenn.  We never knew you. *Yawn*

Oh, while you’re at it today, why not glean what nuggets you may find in the Stop the ACLU Blogburts blogroll?

This repro (with additional comment) of Jay’s Stop the ACLU post at TMH’s Bacon Bits

Here’s one to check out from Ogre about the ACLU bitchin’ and moanin’ about the Feebs actually doing their jobs.

ACLU+Druids vs Christian cops?  Yep. More at NIF.

And here’s a partial list of Glenn delinkers:

Generation Why?
Cafe Oregano
Social Sense
Kender’s Musings
Stacking Swivel
Gribbit Online
Real Teen
Stop The ACLU
American Dinosaur
Zaphriel’s Blog
Euphoric Reality
Basil’s Blog
Mad Tech
Cao’s Blog
Gina’s Rantings
Jo’s Cafe
NIF
Freedom Of
Jack Lewis
GOP Insight
Sondra K
Blogicus
Palmetto Pundit
This Blog Is Full Of Crap
Ogre’s View
TMH Bacon Bits
Bad Hair Blog
The Astute Blogger
Oraculations
Conservative Angst
Part Time Pundit
Mind Of Mog
E-Claire
Curmudgeonly & Skeptical
NY Girl
Political Yen-Yang
Leavworld
Drink This
Moonbattery

third world county

More later, I suppose…