Pieces of Eight

Blogsis Kat tagged me with a blogosphere meme pool tag game, “Eight Things About… Me” or some such. Here are the rules, right from the Kat’s meow:

The Rules are: Each player lists 8 facts/habits about themselves.The rules of the game are posted at the beginning before those facts/habits are listed.At the end of the post, the player then tags 8 people and posts their names, then goes to their blogs and leaves them a comment, letting them know that they have been tagged and asking them to read your blog.

Well, since it’s Kat, I’ll play along. 🙂 If you read her post (DO read it!), you may notice a similarity between her first four “things about me” and mine. No, I didn’t JUST steal her first four and paste ’em here just to get this over with. Her first four things about Kat are just too darned close to things about me to NOT list ’em. Still, she says it so well…

1. I hate typos and misspelled words. When I catch them in a post, or in a comment I just submitted, I cringe in embarrassment, and try to fix it ASAP. Chronic peeves: breath vs. breathe; taut vs. taunt; to, too, and two; and its vs. it’s.

Yeh, well me too. Of course, that doesn’t keep me from excelling in typos, misspelled words and grammar oopsies. Sometimes the voices in my head are all talking at once and my fingers get confused… (That’s my excuse and I’m sticking with it.)

2. I don’t usually like help in the kitchen unless it’s for cleaning up; I have a very particular way I want things done, and usually I get too much into the assumption that I’m the only one who knows how to do it properly.

OK, clarification: I AM the only one who knows how to do “it” properly… *heh* I have my system, my preferred workflow and method of cooking. I also like things put away where I can put my hand on ’em w/o having to look for a tool. When I’m cooking, I want to do things my way, RIGHT NOW, no dodging another cook, no looking for where someone put THAT particular spatula, etc. But cleaning up? Gimme help! (Just put things away in their proper place!)

3. I love to cook…

Well, Kat has a longer expression that diverges from my “thing” a tad. I love to cook; love to cook experimentally. Some dramatic successes d0o result, but also some hilarious failures (Do NOT try to cook tuna enchiladas. Just sayin’… )

4. I can be extremely obstinate; when my mind’s made up, ain’t nobody gonna change my mind…

Here we diverge a bit more. I am NOT “obstinate” but stubborn, muleheaded, adamantine. Anyone who wants to change my thinking on a matter had better marshall their FACTS, make clear, concise, detailed arguments that address the issue, and avoid arguments from emotion or fallacies of logic. Even then, changing my mind will be a difficult task for folks because… I’ll marshall facts, make arguments in rebuttal, etc. Since so few folks will play by the rules of fair argumentation, I rarely feel the need to exercise myself much in rebuttal of their “arguments”.

And departing a tad from Kat’s list, now, as an example of my sometimes irascible nature,

5. When dealing with obstreperous students, I sometimnes offered, “I’m mean and I’m ugly and I have bad breath; and I’m not afraid to prove it to you. Want to try me?” (They rarely did. *heh* Kid walks into first class: “Andre, here’s your pass to the principal’s office.” “But I haven’t done anything!” “You were going to. Goodbye.”)

6. I still have 10 fingers and 10 toes (and–mirabile dictu!–most of my hearing and even some of my sanity) in spite of having taught seventh graders during one dark, dark period of my life.

7. Of all my degrees, I find my PhDBS to be the most helpful in my daily life. (Yes, an honorary doctorate in “bovine scatology”)

8. Call me “Handy”. If it’s broken (whatever “it” is), there’s at least an 80% chance I can fix it. If I can’t fix “it” (whatever “it” is), there’s a very good chance I can make a better one from scratch or from junk n bits n pieces I have laying around.

There, with a little ripping off of Kat’s post, that’s eight pieces of me.

Who to tag? Two with one tag: Diane and Mel! Beth, Angel, Maggie, Lisa, Curt, Adam and one to grow on, TRY (Well, since DIane and Mel might just count as one, that gives me the chance to invite My Favorite Yak to play. :-)).

Weekend Reading List

After you’ve finished reading the Declaration of Independence and making your own list of “long train of abuses” read the posts linking in here.

THIS is an open trackbacks post, open Friday, Saturday and Sunday. Link to THIS post and track back. 🙂

If you have a linkfest/open trackback post to promote OR if you simply want to promote a post via the linkfests/open trackback posts others are offering, GO TO LINKFEST HAVEN DELUXE! Just CLICK the link above or the graphic immediately below.

Linkfest Haven, the Blogger's Oasis

If you want to host your own linkfests but have not yet done so, check out the Open Trackbacks Alliance. The FAQ there is very helpful in understanding linkfests/open trackbacks.

Declaration of Independence

[Adopted in Congress 4 July 1776]

On this anniversary of the adoption of this most American of documents, let me urge you to read the whole thing and, as I have encouraged folks to do for years now, think on those things that were cause for its adoption. Today, we have congresscritters and a president who are as adamantly opposed to fulfilling their duties to the citizens they have pledged to serve as the colonists found their king to be opposed to fulfilling his duties toward his American subjects. (Do note, the colonists were in a long line of English citizenry who had taken kings to task for abuses of aristocratic power–The Peasants’ Revolt of 1381 is but one of many such confrontations with British royalty.)

I do not make this assertion lightly. Read the text, especially the development of the foundations of the claims the document makes as it lists the “long train of abuses” at the hands of the colonists’ ruler. Our “rulers” (for it is just so that the federal government more and more behaves–as our ruler, not our servant) have become more and more abusive toward those to whom they are supposed to serve, more and more dictatorial, more and more arrogant and demanding, ever more the sponsor of anarcho-tyrrany–punishing citizens who want to be law-abiding and rewarding outlaws and scoundrels.

Read the Declaration and think on it.


The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States of America

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.

He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.

He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature.

He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:

For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing taxes on us without our consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:

For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:

For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:

For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:

For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy of the head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levey war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.


Any readers who cannot think of contemporary analogues to many of the offenses listed in the “long train of abuses” feel free to email me or ask in comments for mention of a few to kickstart your thought process, eh? 🙂


THIS is an open trackbacks post. Link to THIS post and track back. 🙂

If you have a linkfest/open trackback post to promote OR if you simply want to promote a post via the linkfests/open trackback posts others are offering, GO TO LINKFEST HAVEN DELUXE! Just CLICK the link above or the graphic immediately below.

Linkfest Haven, the Blogger's Oasis

If you want to host your own linkfests but have not yet done so, check out the Open Trackbacks Alliance. The FAQ there is very helpful in understanding linkfests/open trackbacks.


Trackposted to Right Pundits, The Virtuous Republic, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Perri Nelson’s Website, DeMediacratic Nation, Big Dog’s Weblog, DragonLady’s World, Stuck On Stupid, The Amboy Times, Cao’s Blog, Leaning Straight Up, Pursuing Holiness, Alabama Improper, stikNstein… has no mercy, The World According to Carl, The Pink Flamingo, Planck’s Constant, Dumb Ox Daily News, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Fifi Bush Commutes Scooter’s Sentence… sorta.

But no pardon?

Let’s see now… Sandy Berger WAS guilty of a REAL crime–wittingly stealing and destroying government documents pertinent to an ongoing Congressional investigation–and got a baby slap on the wrist. Scooter Libby is convicted of a non-crime (recalling circumstances differenty to the way a couple of Mass Media Podpeople “remember”–read”Known liars make up story to cover their a__ses”–in a “case” investigating something that was never a crime anyway!) and is socked with a $250,000 fine and real jail time. Ramos and Compean were convicted of another fake crime by a feddle persecutor tasked with enforcing President Fifi Bush’s (Fifi Bush: President Felipe Calderon’s Lapdog) treasonous policy of preventing the enforcement of our borders, and the list goes on and on and on: outlaws and brigands and traitors and thieves rewarded while good folks doing their jobs and trying to be law-abiding citizens are persecuted. It’s classic anarcho-tyranny.

Scooter’s left with no law license, a $250,000 fine and his life in shambles. For recalling something differently to how others recall the event (each of whom recalled it differently from each other, as well–so why aren’t they in trouble?) in the investigation of something that was never a crime to begin with!

Bush long since should have pardoned Ramos and Compean (and placed their feddle persecutor in prison for abuse of power) AND Scooter Libby. Heck, Martha Stewart should have been pardoned and the feddle persecutors (who elicited perjored testimony in order to gain her conviction, if the subsequent indictment for perjury of the chief witness against her is any indication) should have been tarred, feathered and run off the planet.

I have no use for this administration any more. And nearly as little desire to see the congresscritters now populating Congress continue to pollute the air…

I am not here…

I am not here,
This is not me
No matter what you think you see;
I am not here,
This is not me.


Busy day. Already. While I’m kicking alligators and fighting fires, keep my reminders that my mission’s to drain the swamp coming in, would you? IOW, THIS is an open trackbacks post. Link to THIS post and track back. 🙂

If you have a linkfest/open trackback post to promote OR if you simply want to promote a post via the linkfests/open trackback posts others are offering, GO TO LINKFEST HAVEN DELUXE! Just CLICK the link above or the graphic immediately below.

Linkfest Haven, the Blogger's Oasis

If you want to host your own linkfests but have not yet done so, check out the Open Trackbacks Alliance. The FAQ there is very helpful in understanding linkfests/open trackbacks.

Algore’s Chance to Make an Honest Man of Himself

WIll Algore rise to the occasion and embrace the standard he claims to champion in his book, titled with unintentional hilarity, The Assault on Reason? You know what I mean. When he declared,

“We must stop tolerating the rejection and distortion of science. We must insist on an end to the cynical use of pseudo-studies known to be false for the purpose of intentionally clouding the public’s ability to discern the truth.”

…he either meant it honestly… or he was using typical political doublespeak. Now is his opportunity to make an honest man out of himself in the face of mountains of evidence that contradict almost all of his sensationalist claims both in that book and in his disingenuous, “An Inconvenient Truth” (more properly titled, “Gore’s Convenient Lies”).

One of the best short outlines of a few of the, urm distortions of fact (speaking generously: a more accurate word might be “lies”) in Gore’s book/movie is found in the recent SunTimes article, “Alarmist global warming claims melt under scientific scrutiny”.

Sample:

…Gore claims that Himalayan glaciers are shrinking and global warming is to blame. Yet the September 2006 issue of the American Meteorological Society’s Journal of Climate reported, “Glaciers are growing in the Himalayan Mountains, confounding global warming alarmists who recently claimed the glaciers were shrinking and that global warming was to blame.”

The article lists several more examples of false claims made by Algore and his anthropogenic global warming alarmist cronies, along with verifiable facts refuting the false claims.

Will Algore come clean? Will he “…stop tolerating the rejection and distortion of science. We must insist on an end to the cynical use of pseudo-studies known to be false for the purpose of intentionally clouding the public’s ability to discern the truth.”?

Not a snowball’s chance in hell, my friends. Facts mean nothing to slime like Algore, as his record amply demonstrates over and over and over again. No lie is too convenient to foist on a gullible public, no deception too blatant to be used to advance his convenient lies. After all, he had the best training possible for this sort of thing: a political father and his own political life. Lies are mother’s milk to this guy.

The only real question is not whether Algore and his cronies will own up to their deceptions and lies and distortions of fact and embrace their opportunity to “stop tolerating the rejection and distortion of science. We must insist on an end to the cynical use of pseudo-studies known to be false for the purpose of intentionally clouding the public’s ability to discern the truth.” No, the real question is how many sheeple will continue to eagerly swallow their poisonous spew?


Trackposted to Nuke’s news and views, The Virtuous Republic, , Dumb Ox Daily News, and CatSynth.com “catback” weekend, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Milking Card

So, here I am milking an Orson Scott Card article for another post. OK, so the riff yesterday on F42 was just a bit of (well-earned) dissing, not such a much. But further on in the same article Card notes a couple more things that are more than worth commenting on. The first is something I’d heard about but not seen/heard. View the clips below, then my comments.

And…

The show’s the British talent show that American Idol is based on, but it’s apparently quite different to American Idol in that all sorts of talent, not simply pop singing, is welcome. Read Card’s comments on that aspect. As far as Potts’ talent, well, Card’s exactly spot on there as well. Yeh, it’s been about 40 years since my bachelor’s degree in voice, but I agree that while Potts’ singing quite likely was a “breath of fresh air,” as was said, that was probably due more to the quality of the music itself and the lack of quality in other performers’ offerings than to Potts’ presentation, which was good, but not as good as described by Simon Cowell and the other judges.

But please do not mistake me: I think the guy has a very, very good raw talent. I do believe the defects Card and some YouTube commenters note are more defects of training and experience than fault with Potts’ talent. I’d seriously like to see/hear what he could do with good training. I’ve listened to old recordings of Enrico Caruso and John McCormack that were of comparable recording quality to the streamed YouTube recordings, and Potts’ showed nearly as much voice as those two greats could in the low-quality recordings made of them, so I’m not too quick to write Potts off as not having the instrument required to make it in his chosen music venue. I sincerely hope he gets some good training to go with a very nice instrument.

But on another subject. I have been completely turned off by American Idol and other so-called “talent” shows because of the crappy performances overall, along with the crap “music” often featured. So I was, very much like Card, completely surprised when I absently CLICKED through “So You Think You Can Dance?” and… CLICED back to see what the heck was going on… and was HOOKED.

Everything Card says about the show is true in spades. I have NO formal dance training, NO real experience, and yet I’ve been called on to do simple (very, very simple) choreography of a few shows (yeh, and some of them were with grade school kids) and teach what little of “interpretive movement” *heh* I’ve picked up over the years.

This show has been a complete joy to watch, except for the fact that some completely brilliant, wonderful dancers/entertainers must be cut each week for the show to progress. This may be the ONE show I buy DVDs of. Seriously. (OK, I’d buy DVDs of the OLD Dr. Who episodes or the Jeremy Brett “Sherlock Holmes” but that’s about it). This is one of the very few shows I have seen that is really worth my time to SCHEDULE to see it. Of course, a couple of my very fav dancers were cut this week, but those who are left are (mostly) brilliant talents. (OK, one dancer I just do not understand. “Weird” is the word I think of when I see him move. Don’t get me wrong, though: I do like his dancing; I just don’t “get” it. And that is very weird. :-))

Check the show out, if you have not already. Sure, it’s in the final few weeks, now, but that means you’ll see only the good stuff (though, after the initial tryouts, pretty much all of it has been “the good stuff”–so very, very different to American Idol, et al.)

[Oh, and I simply forgot to add earlier… ]

Card ends the “Uncle Orson Reviews Everything” article with a change of pace: some wonderfully snarky observations about my two “favorite” *cough* OSes:

Running a machine that runs Windows is like buying a car – only it comes with a chauffeur, and he’s the only one allowed to drive your car, and he will only take you places he thinks you ought to go, and you have to sit in the seat he tells you to sit in, and he takes days off without any advance notice to you.

The only difference between Windows and Apple, by the way, is that Apple’s chauffeur takes fewer days off, but goes to even fewer destinations, and only one of the doors has a button. So don’t tell me how I should switch to Apple and all my problems will be solved.

*heh*


Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, The Magical Rose Garden, The Random Yak, Blue Star Chronicles, The Pink Flamingo, The Amboy Times, Cao’s Blog, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

F42

I had already decided that I’d skip on the latest Fantastic Four movie. I saw the first one (as a video rental) and it stank up the room, so I figured this one would have small chance for improvement. The only “series” movies in recent memory that have improved as they segued to the next were… LOTR and the Die HArd franchise (although #3 in that franchise stank pretty badly). Orson Scott Card reviews the latest abortion of comics-to-movie here. A sample:

“…as Reed Richards (Gruffudd) and Sue Storm (Alba) are preparing to get married, we want to scream at the screen: No, don’t let them get married! They might have children! It would be a tragedy!”

and

There’s nothing wrong with the Fantastic Four movie series that could not be fixed by destroying every copy of the film.

*heh*

Maybe I’ll watch the thing–a few years from now, when my eyesight and hearing are further deteriorated–when I can get it from the local rental place on a “7 movies for a buck” deal. Maybe not even then. I’d almost rather watch the latest Spiderman flic. *shudder*

Dog Bites Man *yawn*–Mass Media Podpeople Lie *BIG yawn*

Just following yet another example of typical slander “reporting” by Mass Media Podpeople…

A huge tip o’ the tam to Washington Post columnists Roxanne Roberts and Amy Argetsinger for underlining the lies, damned lies and deliberately twisted quotes that are the staple of Mass Media Podpeople “reporting”–in their column this week that “reported”

“The conservative shock-pundit, who sniped on ‘Good Morning America’ Monday that she hoped the Democratic candidate would be ‘killed in a terrorist assassination plot,’ was a guest on MSNBC’s ‘Hardball’ Tuesday night, prompting a live call-in by Elizabeth, who demanded that Coulter ‘stop the personal attacks.’”

Note: the so-called “reporters” said specifically that Coulter hoped the Democratic candidate would be ‘killed in a terrorist assassination plot.’ An outright, bald-faced lie made with obvious malicious intent. Slander, in the ordinary (and legal) understanding of the term. What Coulter actually said was,

“…Bill Maher was not joking and saying he wished Dick Cheney had been killed in a terrorist attack. So I’ve learned my lesson. If I’m going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I’ll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot.”

This just unserscores the fact that Mass Media Podpeople will let no lie go untold in order to slander those whose views they disagree with, and they will let any tasteless remark (ex: the Bill Maher comment) slide if made by someone like Maher about those they dislike, while prominently “reporting” any lie that falsely portrays a simliar “attack” by someone like Coulter about someone on “their side” of trhe Great Divide.

Lies, damned lies and Mass Media Podpeople “reporting”.


Trackposted to Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, Webloggin, Stuck On Stupid, The Pink Flamingo, and Leaning Straight Up, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

What DO Politicians *spit* and Mulish Muslims Have in Common?

It takes a brick bat squarely between the eyes just to get their attention. Examples: swamped senatorial phone/fax lines on the shamnesty fraud juuuuuust managed to avert railroading the bill through the senate; bunker buster bombs on Saddam’s head finally got Qadaffi’s attention a few years ago.

But has the American public learned its lesson about politicians *spit*? We’ll just have to see. American politicians *spit* haven’t managed to learn the lesson about how to handle a Muslim. (Hint repeated: it’s quite a bit a different technique to the one advocated in “How to Handle a Woman”–Camelot, 1967)

(Do note: there was a core–a very small core–of Senators who were right on the shamnesty issue all along. On this issue. There is no small core of Muslims who are not terrorists or terrorist supporters, no matter what some may claim. ALL Muslims revere the FIRST Muslim terrorist, the Butcher of Medina.)


THIS is an open trackbacks post for Friday, Saturday and Sunday. Link to THIS post and track back. 🙂

If you have a linkfest/open trackback post to promote OR if you simply want to promote a post via the linkfests/open trackback posts others are offering, GO TO LINKFEST HAVEN DELUXE! Just CLICK the link above or the graphic immediately below.

Linkfest Haven, the Blogger's Oasis

If you want to host your own linkfests but have not yet done so, check out the Open Trackbacks Alliance. The FAQ there is very helpful in understanding linkfests/open trackbacks.