See this video

I don’t normally refer folks to LGF posts, cos I figure if you’re so inclined you’re already making it a regular stop, anyway. But, just in case any of y’all missed it, yesterday LGF pointed to this video, I, a Muslim.

i_a_muslim02.jpg

Make time to watch it. It’s only a little over 25 minutes long, but may be an eye opener for some. Post a link to it on your own blogs and email the link to folks who don’t read blogs.

Cluebat for open borders folks: the lessons of the video include lessons about the dangers of open borders in general, not just about Islamicization of the West. (Not that open borders folks will take the lessons to heart… *sigh*)

Guard the Borders

Sadly, I fell behind the curve and didn’t even see this in my inbox from Heidi until this a.m., when I was cruising around my blogroll and saw it had been posted at Linknzona. I’m thinking… if President Bush weren’t a Mexican Lapdog, these guys should get a Presidential pardon… and a medal for marksmanship.

*sigh*

OK, maybe not the marksmanship medal. After all, they missed the X-ring…

On a related note, I just recieved a “report card” from NumbersUSA on one of my state’s senators. While I’d have graded a bit more strictly (as evidenced by the sentiments voiced above), Jum Talent’s “A” report card is a Good Thing.

Here’s the day-late GTB post:


There are only a few hours left to have some impact on the case of two Border Patrol agents, Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean, who are being sentenced tomorrow for attempting to apprehend a drug smuggler who was fleeing across the border illegally. The charges against the Border Patrol agents were serious bodily injury; assault with a deadly weapon; discharge of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence; and a civil rights violation. Compean and Ramos also were convicted of four counts and two counts, respectively, of obstruction of justice for not reporting that their weapons had been fired. The Texas jury acquitted both men of assault with intent to commit murder, but found them guilty on all other charges. The recommended sentencing is 20 years in prison.

You can read the entire account of the case in this Daily Bulletin article written by Sara Carter, but there are a few things you need to know up front:

  • Assistant U.S. Attorney Debra Kanof, who prosecuted this travesty of justice against the two BP agents, has successfully contended that BP agents are NOT SUPPOSED to apprehend or pursue illegals.
  • “It is a violation of Border Patrol regulations to go after someone who is fleeing,” she said. “The Border Patrol pursuit policy prohibits the pursuit of someone.”

  • Two weeks after the incident, a Homeland Security agent tracked down the drug smuggler in Mexico and offered him immunity to testify against the two Texas Border Patrol agents. They found the drug smuggler based upon a tip from another BP agent in Arizona! The connection between the Arizona BP agent and the drug smuggler is murky, though the prosecutor gets upset at any one who dares to question the unsavory connection.
  • The drug smuggler was treated to free tax-payer funded medical care in El Paso in addition to his full immunity to testify against the BP agents.
  • The drug smuggler changed his story, but the fact that he lied was never disclosed to the jury.
  • According to the memo, Aldrete-Davila told investigators the agents shot him in the buttocks when he was trying to enter the country illegally from Mexico. But according to Aldrete-Davila’s later testimony and that of the agents, he was shot after trying to evade the agents upon his re-entry into Mexico.

    The memo never was disclosed to the jury.

  • The drug smuggler is now suing the Border Patrol for $5 million for violating his civil rights.
  • Also, Ramos’ extensive training and accomplishments in drug interdiction, which would be directly relevant to the actions he took during the incident with the drug smuggler, was deemed not admissible during his trial.
  • As a Border Patrol agent, Ramos has been involved in the capture of nearly 100 drug smugglers and the seizure of untold thousands of pounds of narcotics. He also was nominated for Border Patrol Agent of the Year in March 2005, though the nomination was withdrawn after details of the Aldrete-Davila incident came out.

    Ramos also had drug interdiction training from the Drug Enforcement Agency and qualified as a Task Force Officer with the Border Patrol. But Ramos’ training in narcotics — as well as the numerous credentials he had received for taking Border Patrol field training classes — was not admissible during the trial, he said.

    TJ Bonner, president of the National Border Patrol Council, just addressed the Congressional hearings here in Houston on August 16th, where this case was of great concern among all the law enforcement officials.

    He said the Border Patrol’s official pursuit policy handcuffs agents in the field. He also sees the prosecution of Ramos and Compean as part of a larger effort by the federal government.

    “The pursuit policy has negatively affected the Border Patrol’s mission as well as public safety. Part of that mission is to stop terrorists and drug smugglers,” Bonner said. “They could be smuggling Osama bin Laden, drugs, illegal aliens, or it could have been just some drunk teenager out on a joyride. You don’t know until you stop them.”

    “The administration is trying to intimidate front-line agents from doing their job,” he added. “If they can’t do it administratively, they’ll do it with trumped-up criminal charges.

    “Moreover, the specter of improprieties in the prosecution of this case raises serious concerns that demand an immediate, thorough and impartial investigation.”

  • Ramos and Compean and their young families have been living under threats of retaliation from criminals in the drug underworld.
  • The El Paso Sheriff’s Department has met with the Ramos family to discuss continued threats against them from people they believe to be associated with Aldrete-Davila. The sheriff’s department also has increased patrols around the family’s home.

    The only other organization that has responded to the Ramoses thus far, Monica Ramos said, is the Chino-based nonprofit group Friends of the Border Patrol, chaired by Andy Ramirez.

    “This is the greatest miscarriage of justice I have ever seen,” Ramirez said. “This drug smuggler has fully contributed to the destruction of two brave agents and their families and has sent a very loud message to the other Border Patrol agents: If you confront a smuggler, this is what will happen to you.”

    This case has been virtually ignored by the press, which is why the American public only found out about it after the conviction of the two BP agents. But now that we know, we must take action. If, as TJ Bonner has said, this case is a dirty attempt by our government to intimidate law enforcement officers into leaving the borders wide open and unguarded, then the American people must speak out immediately.

    You can do so by signing a petition that will be delivered to the President – but you must do so TODAY, it’s the last day. The men will be sentenced tomorrow.

    The goal is to collect 100,000 signatures asking President Bush to pardon these two men. So far, 97,589 people have signed the petition and there is no doubt in my mind that Guard the Borders readers can fill in the remaining numbers needed. The petition, to which you may add your own comment reads as follows:

    To: President George W. Bush,

    As a citizen of the United States I am outraged to learn that two U.S. Border Agents are facing twenty-year prison terms for doing their jobs– pursuing illegal aliens who cross our border, and I’m calling on you to officially pardon them for their actions.

    I am even more outraged to learn that this illegal alien (who was attempting to smuggle about 800 pounds of marijuana into our country), was tracked down by a Department of Homeland Security Investigator and granted immunity for his testimony against these two agents!

    This is a terrible injustice, and I urge you to use your considerable authority and power to pardon these two agents and right this obvious wrong!

    In addition to rallying your friends and family to take action with you, I would also ask that you call the White House Comments line, and leave a message on behalf of these agents. White House Comments line: 202-456-6213

    Please do not hesitate to take this small action on behalf of men whose lives have been destroyed by a drug smuggler and corrupt government agents and prosecutors. It’s the very least we can do for them – I wish there was more.

    What if this was you? What will happen to these two men? What will be the fallout from such a miscarriage of justice?

    “My husband is a good man, a loving father, and his devotion to his country and his job is undeniable,” Monica Ramos said. “Prosecutors treated the drug smuggler like an innocent victim, refusing to allow testimony that would have helped my husband. The smuggler was given immunity. My husband is facing a life in prison.

    “It’s so frightening, it doesn’t seem real.”

    COUNTING THE DAYS

    About a week ago, feeling little hope, Joe Loya, Monica Ramos’ father, took the family on what will be Ignacio Ramos’ last fishing trip with his sons before he is sentenced.

    “What kind of justice is this?” Loya asked. “What kind of nation do we live in when the word of a smuggler means more than the word of a just man?”

    Monica Ramos says her hardest day is yet to come — the day the authorities take her husband away.

    “We just guard (our children’s) hearts right now,” Monica Ramos said. “I think about the last time he’ll hug them as children, and maybe not get the chance to hug them again until they are grown men.”

    The sons are between 6 and 13 years old.

    Ignacio Ramos was, if anything, even more emotional.

    “Less than a month left with my family,” he said, his voice choking, as though the air had been pulled from his lungs. “My sons,” he whispered. Then silence.

    It took several minutes for Ramos to summon more words. “All I think about at night is the day I have to leave my family. I can’t sleep. I’ve always been with them.”

    Then he talked about the memories he would never have, “their first dates, high school graduation, sports,” and the tears falling from his eyes were mirrored only by those of his wife, who took his hand into hers.

    Families destroyed. A drug smuggler on the loose to threaten the lives of others and on the scam for $5 million dollars. And a government who won’t do anything about either – unless we force it to.

    The only ones left who can help are the American people themselves. That means you.


    This has been a production of the Guard the Borders Blogburst. It is syndicated by Euphoric Reality, and serves to keep immigration issues in the forefront of our minds as we’re going about our daily lives and continuing to fight the war on terror. If you are concerned with the trend of illegal immigration in our country, join the Blogburst! Send an email with your blog name and url to euphoricrealitynet at gmail dot com.

    Roundup/Tuesday OP

    This is an open trackbacks post. Link to this post and track back.


    Today, a short roundup of reads ranging from chuckles through interesting to important. In no particular order.

    At The Wide Awakes, Gribbit, Cao and Richard Nixon *heh* make some important points about the war Mohammedans started with the U.S.

    Over at Anywhere But Here, Kris makes war against another enemy… 🙂 Kinda reminds me of this:

    Joe's Apartment

    Joe's Apartment

    …and this.

    And going from the ridiculous to the more ridiculous, The Random Yak explains the primary reasons some people didn’t go see Snakes on a Plane.”

    Linknzona (among others) reminds me I failed to get the Guard the Borders blogburst post up yesterday (I’ll get A Round To-it in a bit here)… simply by doing it… *sigh* If you just can’t wait for me to get A Round To-it, read Linknzona’s blog.

    Woody’s Thermos Bottle Magic, at GM Roper’s, is a great thumb in the eye to moonbats. 😉

    Lisa Renee (Liberal Commonsense) points out the udderly ridiculous.

    Swinging back to take perfect aim on the X-ring on a Very Important Target, Alexandra blows a BIG hole in UNSC Resolution 1701.

    Kat (Cathouse Chat) points to How to Negotiate with Terrorists. READ IT.

    And in a post that’s strongly related, though it may not appear to be at first glance, Nathan Bradfielfd notes, The Groundswell to Tear Down the Wall. Yeh, it’s a part of the same war.

    UPDATE: The Random Yak has corralled some interesting posts. Brand ’em, Yak.

    That’s all for now. Maybe more later. Hit me with some good shots below


    As I said, this is an open trackback post. Link to this post and then track back. If you want to host your own linkfests, check out

    Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at Linkfest Haven.

    Linkfest Haven

    Lil Wintip/OP

    This is an open trackbacks post. Link to this post and track back.

    If you want to host your own linkfests, check out

    Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at Linkfest Haven.

    Linkfest Haven


    This is a followup to a post made last week about the inadvisability of regularly running ANY computer in ANY OS with admins priviledges while connected to a network, especially the internet. Some users of WinXP Home edition have noted that they lose the abilility to even start or use some programs without admin priviledges. (Maybe that’s a good thing, maybe not. :-))

    In XP Pro, it’s pretty easy to use the Security Console to set those kinds of priviledges granularly, but XP Home is kinda crippled that way. Here’s how to easily work around that while still maintaining a fairly secure environment. Me$$ySoft KB301634:

    How to Use the RUN AS Command to Start a Program as an Administrator

    As an administrator, you can use the run as command to start a program. To do so:

    1.) Locate the program you want to start in Windows Explorer, the Microsoft Management Console (MMC), or Control Panel.
    2.) Press and hold down the SHIFT key while you right-click the program icon, and then click Run as.
    3.) Click Run the program as the following user, and then type the user name, password, and domain of the administrator account you want to use.

    You may have to share your Program Files folder while in an admin session in order to see the program you want to run with admin priviledges. Oh, the lil workaround works when CLICK-ing on a shortcut to the program as well, so perhaps better would be to share/copy your C:\Documents and Settings\[Admin User Account]\Start Menu over to your non-admin account. That way, if some of those programs require admin priviledges to start/run, you can still use the tip above w/o having to hunt through Explorer panes.

    It’s easy. It works. And it still keeps you from having to run your computer in an administrative-priviledged session. More secure.

    If there are issues like that on the Mac side when running in a non-admin session, maybe someone could note in comments. Most current Linux distros will simply ask for an admin password if one needs admin priviledges while in a User session.

    A General Summary

    I may ber back later, weekend “projects” permitting, to do a roundup post of sorts, but for now, it seems like a good time for a reminder that others have looked at current events in their own time and noticed that the character of mankind leads very naturally to the close observer shrugging and saying simply, plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose

    A General Summary

    We are very slightly changed
    From the semi-apes who ranged
    India’s Prehistoric clay;
    He that drew the longest bow
    Ran his brother down, you know,
    As we run men down to-day.

    “Dowb,” the first of all his race,
    Met the Mammoth face to face
    On the lake or in the cave:
    Stole the steadiest canoe,
    Ate the quarry others slew,
    Died — and took the finest grave.

    When they scratched the reindeer-bone,
    Some one made the sketch his own,
    Filched it from the artist — then,
    Even in those early days,
    Won a simple Viceroy’s praise
    Through the toil of other men.
    Ere they hewed the Sphinx’s visage
    Favouritism governed kissage,
    Even as it does in this age.

    Who shall doubt “the secret hid
    Under Cheops’ pyramid”
    Was that the contractor did
    Cheops out of several millions?
    Or that Joseph’s sudden rise
    To comptroller of Supplies
    Was a fraud of monstrous size
    On King Pharaoh’s swart Civilians?

    Thus, the artless songs I sing
    Do not deal with anything
    New or never said before.
    As it was in the beginning
    Is to-day official sinning,
    And shall be for evermore!

    Rudyard Kipling

    Memory plays tricks. I still hear, in my minds ear, “whoso drew the longest bow” in the fourth line. Oh. Well. I do the same to Stevenson and Tennyson. Always “improving” their writing in my memory.

    Jill Carroll on her captivity

    Hie theee to The Christian Science Monitor and read Jill Carroll’s story in her own words. JUST DO IT. One reader who pointed the article out over at Chaos Manor Musings responded to the account,

    …WE tolerate absurd depictions of Christ without ever demanding that the authors or artists be murdered. They don’t. So we run cowed by their threat? Color me pissed at that cowardice on the part of our media and our government.

    Exactly.

    Tacked to the walls at TMH’s Bacon Bits (but leaving the backsplash in TMH and his Lovely Wife’s hands), Woman Honor Thyself and Blue Star Chronicles.

    Is it just me?

    It’s Friday and this is an Open Trackback Alliance post. Link to this post and track back all weekend. More below.


    Is it just me, or is the “news” of contemporary events all—or at least almost all—bad, ranging from the merely dismal to the catestrophic? even the weatherman seems apologetic and tentative when he has good news, as if to say, “Well, the weather will be nice today, but don’t blame me. I’ll be sure to have bad news tomorrow. Besides, haven’t I given y’all the good news in as gloomy a fashion as possible?”

    Is it really the case that it’s just human nature to want bad news, so the market’s just feeding us what we want?

    Or is it the case that human beings are, as Christian theology teaches, fundamentally self-flawed, sinful creations who typically make bad news, and that in any case, the universe itself is out to get us?

    *heh*

    Still, there has to be better news out there than the Mass MEdia Podpeople’s Army and all its Hiveminded minions bring us.

    Doesn’t there? Somewhere?

    Maybe Ferdy has heard some…


    As I said, this is an open trackback post open all weekend long. Link to this post and then track back. If you want to host your own linkfests, check out

    Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at Linkfest Haven.

    Linkfest Haven

    Well, I can believe the first part of that, at least.

    Today was eaten by locusts…

    …but they were such niiiiice lil bugs…

    (Semi-late—freebie, of course :-)—”tech support” call from a relative outa state… while I was in NO position to help didn’t help with the fighting fires, kicking aligators and roasting locusts, either. Oh, and not calling for self, for a friend, who, as it turns out, only had one real problem with his dialup: he’d not paid the bill. *sigh* No, can’t have my credit card number. *heh*)

    Arrrrgggghhhh!

    Back when I can pretend to be sane.

    Fair Tax Blogburst/OTA Wednesday

    This is Wednesday’s

    post. Link to this post and then track back.

    Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at Linkfest Haven.

    Linkfest Haven


    Here’s a fact-based opinion from a real (as opposed to fake, like typical Democratic leadership) liberal concerning the nature and effect of the Fair Tax. Now, while I normally view anything from a “liberal” stance with as much skepticism as I view comments from s soi-disant “conservative” politicians, this guy makes some good points.

    Which led to me calling him a real liberal in my opening remark.

    Read, and tell me what you think. It’s a little long for a blogpost, but very much worth your time to read. Please do.


    Reprinted with permission from Running in Circles
    by Connor Carney

    The Progressive Democrats’ Sales Tax

    I consider myself to be fairly liberal on most issues. So some of you might be surprised that I am about to take a position that’s usually the providence of hardcore conservatives. I support HR25—the Fair Tax Act of 2005.

    Yeah. The one that would replace virtually the entire tax system with a 23% sales tax.

    I read about it most recently in an unnecessarily hostile editorial by Matthew Holmes. Truth be told, his article did nothing to convince me that the tax is a good thing. But it convinced me to wade through the full text of the legislation, and I’ve decided that not only is the Fair Tax Act justifiable, it is the ideal legislation for progressive Democrats. I’ll explain why.

    Defining “Progressive”

    I used the word “progressive” up there in my introduction. Exactly what that term means can be a little shaky sometimes, but when we’re talking about tax code, it has a pretty clear meaning: people with more money shoulder more of the tax burden. Using this definition, sales taxes are usually something progressives would avoid, since they often hit the poor the hardest. Most sales taxes make life considerably harder for the impoverished, because they increase the cost of basic necessities, making it harder for people to get by.

    A National Luxury Tax

    This proposal isn’t like that. The secret lies in Title II, Sections 301-303, a provision called the “family consumption allowance.” These provisions allow families to purchase necessities without paying taxes on them. (“Family” means “1 or more family members sharing a common residence”).

    This exemption does something interesting: it means that the government would only get taxes from the sales of nonessentials—things that the impoverished, by definition, don’t buy. By allowing essential products to be purchased without the tax, it turns the “national sales tax” into something more like a “national luxury tax”.

    In other words, people who spend most of their money on things like food, clothing, and medicine end up paying almost none of the tax burden, while people who spend a greater percentage of their income on luxuries pay a greater percentage of the tax burden. People who don’t have very much money almost uniformly fall into the former group, while people with lots of money almost uniformly fall into the latter group. People with more money shoulder more of the tax burden—it’s as progressive as is gets.

    Helping the Needy

    Continue reading “Fair Tax Blogburst/OTA Wednesday”

    Profiling the enemy (hint: it’s not exactly who you might think)

    This is Tuesday’s Open Post. Link to this post and track back. More below the profiling proposal…


    A recent comment by Jerry Pournelle, in excerpt:

    “We would, apparently, give up air travel entirely than to treat young males of Middle Eastern origin traveling alone or with other males differently from the way we treat 80 year old grandmothers traveling with their children and grandchildren. We all know the dangers, don’t we? Old ladies often blow themselves up with their children and grand children. So do retired generals carrying the Medal of Honor, can’t treat them differently from — well, you get the idea. Liberalism is a philosophy of consolation for the West as it commits suicide.”

    Profiling works. Ask the safest airline in the world, El Al.

    But our political masters see it otherwise.

    *sigh*

    “Liberalism is a philosophy of consolation for the West as it commits suicide.” (James Burnham)

    And kid thyself not: the modern American “conservatism” (of our political masters) is even more fitting to recieve Dabney’s condemnation than the “conservatism” of the 19th Century was:

    “American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward to perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt hath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It tends to risk nothing serious for the sake of truth.” – R. L. Dabney

    Thousands Standing Around: an experiment in full employment for thugs and goons from the left end of the Bell Curve designed to see just how much freedom the sheeple will surrender for percieved safety. No genuine improvement in security. All sizzle, little (if any) steak. What better example of our political masters’ Prime Directive: perception is everything, substance nothing, in managing the sheeple.”

    And that brings up the need for profiling. The American electorate needs to start profiling political candidates and eliminating the fluff–those who are actively inimical to protecting the liberties of the American people or simply too much in love with their own image and hungry for power–who are the most serious enemies of the Republic, before they can do more harm…


    As I said, this is an open trackback post. Link to this post and track back. If you want to host your own linkfests, check out

    Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at Linkfest Haven.

    Linkfest Haven