Another voice heard from on the Schiavo case

Killing Grandma for Fun and Profit

Folks who’ve read this blog (and my e-logging previously) may well be familiar with holly Lisle. Every now and then I recommend reading her essay, “How to Write Suckitudinous Fiction.” In her previous “life” (before her success as a science fiction author), Holly was—still is, for that matter—an RN. She’s seen folks like Terri Sciavo. Holly has a well-thought-out piece up about the implications of the Schiavo case that I highly recommend. Just CLICK on the linked title, “Killing Grandma for Fun and Profit”

h/t: Jerry Pournelle’s Current Mail

“Kipling Tuesday”—a cautionary note to the MMPA and LLMB

“We hear that there are tumults and riots in Rome, and that voices are raised concerning the army and the quality of our soldiers. Make haste to reassure us that you love and support us as we love and support you, for if we find that we have left our bones to bleach in these sands in vain, then beware the fury of the legions.”

The Loony Left Moonbat Brigade and their co-conspirators in the Mass Media Podpeople’s Army do all they can to bring about an attitude like the one shown “Tommy” below. They succeeded with the Vietnam War. This time around, they have failed—so far.

TOMMY

I went into a public-‘ouse to get a pint o’ beer,
The publican ‘e up an’ sez, “We serve no red-coats here.”
The girls be’ind the bar they laughed an’ giggled fit to die,
I outs into the street again an’ to myself sez I:
O it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Tommy, go away”;
But it’s “Thank you, Mister Atkins”, when the band begins to play,
The band begins to play, my boys, the band begins to play,
O it’s “Thank you, Mister Atkins”, when the band begins to play.

I went into a theatre as sober as could be,
They gave a drunk civilian room, but ‘adn’t none for me;
They sent me to the gallery or round the music-‘alls,
But when it comes to fightin’, Lord! they’ll shove me in the stalls!
For it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Tommy, wait outside”;
But it’s “Special train for Atkins” when the trooper’s on the tide,
The troopship’s on the tide, my boys, the troopship’s on the tide,
O it’s “Special train for Atkins” when the trooper’s on the tide.

Yes, makin’ mock o’ uniforms that guard you while you sleep
Is cheaper than them uniforms, an’ they’re starvation cheap;
An’ hustlin’ drunken soldiers when they’re goin’ large a bit
Is five times better business than paradin’ in full kit.

Then it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Tommy, ‘ow’s yer soul?”
But it’s “Thin red line of ‘eroes” when the drums begin to roll,
The drums begin to roll, my boys, the drums begin to roll,
O it’s “Thin red line of ‘eroes” when the drums begin to roll.

We aren’t no thin red ‘eroes, nor we aren’t no blackguards too,
But single men in barricks, most remarkable like you;
An’ if sometimes our conduck isn’t all your fancy paints,
Why, single men in barricks don’t grow into plaster saints;
While it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that,
an’ “Tommy, fall be’ind”,
But it’s “Please to walk in front, sir”,
when there’s trouble in the wind,
There’s trouble in the wind, my boys,
there’s trouble in the wind,
O it’s “Please to walk in front, sir”,
when there’s trouble in the wind.

You talk o’ better food for us, an’ schools, an’ fires, an’ all:
We’ll wait for extry rations if you treat us rational.
Don’t mess about the cook-room slops, but prove it to our face
The Widow’s Uniform is not the soldier-man’s disgrace.

For it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Chuck him out, the brute!”
But it’s “Saviour of ‘is country” when the guns begin to shoot;
An’ it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ anything you please;
An’ Tommy ain’t a bloomin’ fool–you bet that Tommy sees!

Yeh, the LLMB and the MMPA want us to fall for their lies that they support the troops but oppose the war. And how do they show that? By lying about what our troops do and the effect they are having. These folk present our military as having killed an enormous number of Iraqi civilians—often lumping in with genuine casualties both numbers of Iraqis slain by terrorists and the dead scum (the terrorists), then disingenuously inflating the number of both.

Bah. Wait until “the legions” have their turn to express their thoughts on the matter to the MMPA and LLMB…

And don’t for a minute fall for the idea that the reception Tommy got (and that the LLMB and MMPA really want for our military at home) has a good chance of taking hold. Fortunately, even with attempts to manufacure a generation of idiots via prisons for kids masquerading as so-called “public schools,” there are more than enough people in this country who know better than to show such disrespect toward the men and women who are fighting terorists there so that we do not have to do so here. More than enough to serve as a bulwark against the lies damned lies and “news” reporting (with apologies to Mark Twain) that the LLMB and MMPA attempt to feed the public daily.

Fun with stats

Another undeserved ranking

For the life of me, I do not believe I’ll ever figure google out… The other day, I quoted Jerry Pournelle writing about the Schiavo case,

“… As it is, she has no one to defend her but some people who actually believe in law and justice and are not raising a rebellion in her aid.

Esmerelda had her beggars as defenders. But she was hanged quickly even so. Along with her goat.”

Checking my stats, I saw that someone had googled “Esmerelda goat hanged” and my post quoting Dr. Pournelle was listed fourth… pages before the post at Chaos Manor Musings I gleaned the quote from.

Thanks for the (one) hit, google, but really, now: wouldn’t Pournelle’s original comment have been a better reference than my quote of him?

Yeh, I know it probably has to do with me linking back to his comment and others linking to my comment, etc., but still.

Thanks for all the fish.

(My hold on both the #1 and #2 google spots for both “I hate Intuit” and “hate Intuit” makes sense though. *heh*)

That’s America’s Third World Countyâ„¢ for ya…

… quasi-lbertarian (small “l”) and completely “Your business ends where my nose begins, bubba”

Found on the local grocery’s bulletin board:


You read the card right. it says, “We clean meth houses… ” Posted by Hello

A business that’s apparently been bringing clean meth houses to America’s Third World Countyâ„¢ since, oh, about 2004 or so, if it’s any of your business, which it isn’t…

Making omlets

what to do with broken eggs?

If the Terri Schiavo case establishes principle (that it is humane to starve someone to death), then it only seem right, as a commenter to IMAO has suggested (scroll down the comments), that this would be the answer to those who believe the death penalty for monsters is inhumane: simply treat them as Loony Left Moonbats and mass Media Podpeople (as well as monstrous judges, all) say is humane to treat those who have broken no law but are inconvenient because of their profound disability(ies).

That’s right: starve the bastards to death. After all, if it’s humane when applied to someone who’s not committed a crime, would it not also be humane when applied to monsters?

Snarking the Poet

Topic Drift Knows How to Do it Right

Just read and learn as Topic Drift opens a can of snark and dumps it all over Carolyn Forché (whoever that is. Some obscure person calling herself a poet, apparently):

She calls herself a “poet of witness.” Bah. No such thing. One might just as well call oneself a “nursemaid of trout” or “lieutenant of puddings” or “Human Resources Director” or “lumberjack of peri-menopause” or “emperor of ice cream”. All nonsense. That last one’s taken, I think.

You want more? There’s much more.

*rara avis*

Have you ever known one of these?

I’ve never had the pleasure/priviledge of working for or with a supervisor/manager/boss like this:

“He’s loyal to his employees; he knows them and cares about them and treats them well. He goads them to make sure he hears all points of view. He does not encourage rivalry and competition among them. He surrounds himself with people who are widely regarded as being smarter than he is, and values the ideas of those who are better-informed…” ?Orson Scott Card

Who was Orson Scott Card talking about, this rare person who embodies the commonsense approach we all wish our boss/manager/supervisor in some (probably past) job had embodied? Is it some character in one of his well-written novels? Possibly a protagonist who overcomes great obstacles and triumphs because of the heroic character that truly values those he leads?

No. Orson was synopsizing Ari Fleischer’s description iof President Bush in Fleischer’s new book, Taking the Heat..