Anti-Malware Warning

Microsoft Security Essentials popped up a warning a couple of days ago about an attachment to an email (see “Gullibility: Bad; Skepticism: Good”–yes it was that email–I received it multiple times). I decided to see how it handled it and told it to simply delete it.

It did. It also deleted ALL the emails in my inbox. Not to worry. First, most of my email is filtered into subordinate boxes and none of that email was touched. Second, I concatenate all my email accounts using GMail to collected from three different email servers, then I download everything from the GMail collection. So, all my email is already “backed up” there. Third, I use Thunderbird Portable and can (and do) back up my email again, weekly, by simply copying the Mail folder from the Thunderbird Portable folder to a more durable medium than the flash drive Thunderbird Portable runs from.

So, no mail was lost.

But, if you don’t have multiple backups and do run into a similar situation, don’t say you weren’t warned. 🙂

“Greatest Songs”?

LomaAlta has proposed the “Top Ten Songs of the 1950s” with his numbers 7-10 listed here. While I don’t disagree with his list (“Top Ten” may well reflect popularity as much as musical worth) and I do agree that his list of songs contain pop songs of some worth, I’d have a different list. Yeh, even in my home with three sisters and a brother, I was the really odd one out. Their 50s (and later 60s) pop music didn’t appeal to me much. Frankly, during those early years, I was much more enamored of instrumental music, particularly classical (which did include some Classical,Romantic and Baroque)–very little contemporary music penetrated my hearing until my college years… when, strangely, my studies were focused on classical music training.

So, my list of songs–50s or othewrwise–is very different to LomaAlta’s–or most folks’ for that matter.

I’ll just my top five:

Number 5:

Of this performance… *sigh* I dislike some of Alastair Miles’ vowel choices, but the Baroque trumpet is just as nearly perfect as one could hope for, and my quibbles about Miles’ vowels are just that: quibbles. Definitely belongs in my top five best songs.

Number 4:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pQ8cIi1Gpk

What list could be complete without Rogers Covey-Crump’s performance of Purcell’s “first” setting of, “If Music Be the Food of Love”? Most counter-tenors sound awfully artificial, but Covey-Crump captures this wonderful lil song almost to perfection (His “the’s” thud on the ear, but that’s a small price to pay for the rest of the performance). BTW, Purcell’s other settings of this text are also worth listening to, IMO.

Number 3:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJCnqJJ9uRs

Bryn Terfel’s performance here is my favorite YouTube performance of this stunningly beautiful aria from Xerxes. Yes, another song by Handel. He really knew how to write a melodic line.

Number 2:

Regular readers here have already seen and heard this video multiple times. While the entire Die Winterreise song cycle stands as the single greatest collection of great songs for solo voice, in my opinion, and makes choosing just one an exercise in frustration, this song just grabs me more than any of the rest. Stunning. And, of course, Der Lindenbaum sung by Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau–INarguably, the greatest baritone of the 20th Century, accompanied by Alfred Brendel, well, breathtaking is the least praise I can extend.

But what could edge that out? How about The Last Great Song ever written? *heh* Yep. From the 1926 hit opera, Turandot: Nessun Dorma , sung by the only guy who could squeak by Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau for the number one spot as “greatest voice of the 20th Century”–Jussi Björling.

Number 1:

While none of these performances are “perfect” (Fischer-Dieskau, for example, was in his 60s and well past his prime in the performance above), all are great songs, performed by some of the best (and in the last two examples, THE best) voices of the 20th Century, well worth being included in anyone’s “ear conditioning” collection.

I probably have a few hundred other “best” or great songs floating around in my mind’s ear, but these might help put some of the “music” being pushed out to deaden folks’ ears today into some sort of perspective. BTW, Mozart’s Die Zauberflöte is pretty much devoid of great songs, but of you can get your hands on a recording with Fischer-Dieskau in the role of Papageno, you’ve found a treasure. Oh, it’s not rare; the treasure’s in Mozart’s music and the wonderful voice of Fischer-Dieskau.

Irresistible iPad Video… and One Notsomuch Irresistible

And continuing the dissing of Apple’s latest bid to leech money from suckers, this article and discussion at PCMagazine’s site compels me to respond (here, because with a couple hundred W3C errors on the PCMag page, wouldn’t you know that one of ’em is making my comment submission fail). But first, the “official” Apple iPad intro:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDNVAgxOIew

Apple: “The best web surfing experience, the best email experience, the best photo and movie watching experience… ” And no, I did NOT add the emphasis. Just watch the thing. It’s in the original Apple video.

These claims are simply over the top, unsupportable, ridiculous. NONE of those experiences on a 9.7″ screen with NO keyboard and tiny lil speakers can be “the best” anything.

Also from the video, “…a screen THIS large…” *feh* As large as my usual 23″ widescreen I’m using to view this page? “Large” is silly. Large compared with a iPhone? Sure, but that’s not what 99% of folks use for their primary web browsing and email and video viewing experiences. For a reason. Actually, many reasons.

Contrast the iPad’s really minimalist feature set (designed to do almost nothing but sell more media from Apple) to something like the ASUS Eee PC T91MT Multi-touch (convertible, on the fly) Tablet Netbook. 32GB SSD (+500GB included online storage), actual keyboard and touchpad for real computing needs, USB, media card slots, WiFi, Bluetooth and more… for $115 less than the base 32GB SSD iPad.

Add 3G hardware to the iPad and bump it up another $130, but add the same functionality with an UNLOCKED 3G USB peripheral to the ASUS unit? Easily done for about $50. Oh, and did I mention almost unlimited inexpensive expandability for the lil ASUS via the USB ports?

What’s to like about the iPad in comparison to the lil ASUS?

Well, the chief “benefits” of the iPad seem to be paying (lots) more for (a lot) fewer features and being locked into the Apple Straight Jacket. Woo-hoo! Sign me up to blow more of my money for fewer features!

Not.

Caveat: I don’t own one of them–yet; gotta save those nickels and dimes, folks–but I gather from users that the first thing to do with one of the lil ASUS comps is UNinstall the preinstalled Touch Gate software, since it is just a hanger-on from when the comp was designed to be able to run XP with multi-touch. Win7 Home Premium (preinstalled) has all the multi-touch capabilities built in.

BTW, the lil ASUS unit has been in the channel since at least November of last year, and numerous tablet notebooks abound. So, tell me exactly, just what’s so new and ground-breaking about the iPad? Oh, the Apple book/media store? Kindle for PC, and Barnes and Noble’s eBook offerings alone top 1,000,000 in the ePub and pdf formats, downloadable without a B&N nook and usable on a PC, why! even on a lil ASUS (or any other) tablet PC with higher screen resolutions than the iPad.

Color me unimpressed with the iPad. Just another way for Apple to con suckers out of more money in the Apple Straight Jacket Store.

Gullibility: Bad; Skepticism: Good

First, the obvious denotative meanings:

gullible: easily duped or cheated

skeptical: relating to, characteristic of, or marked by skepticism: 1 : an attitude of doubt or a disposition to incredulity either in general or toward a particular object
2 a : the doctrine that true knowledge or knowledge in a particular area is uncertain b : the method of suspended judgment, systematic doubt, or criticism characteristic of skeptics


I’d bet the post title led regular readers to think this post’d be about politics. Well, it could as easily have been, but no.

I am, on the one hand, amused by all the spam I still get that attempts to gull me into opening infected attachments. I filter my email two ways, so spam in my inbox is way down from the hundred per day I once received to just a few a day. But still, I get at least 3 or 4 emails a week with infected attachments that some spammer thinks he can fool me into opening. Such as,

Microsoft has released an update for Microsoft Outlook / Outlook Express. This update is critical and provides you with the latest version of the Microsoft Outlook / Outlook Express and offers the highest levels of stability and security.

Instructions

* Install Update for Microsoft Outlook / Outlook Express (KB910721). To do this, follow these steps:
1. Run attached file officexp-KB910721-FullFile-ENU.exe
2. Restart Microsoft Outlook / Outlook Express

Riiiight. As though Microsoft sent out critical updates as email attachments. Not. Any moron with more active brain cells than a head of cabbage would sneer at this attempt to gull users into self-infection. I didn’t even bother to rescan the thing, since it didn’t get flagged by resident AV on its way in (some don’t, you know). The “sender” was… me. That’s right, the email header was forged to make it appear that I sent the email that was supposedly from Microsoft to myself.

Silly spammer. As though such silly stunts would fool me. I do have more active brain cells than a head of cabbage. Just. *heh*

I don’t know how anyone who is able to press the “On” button on a computer could be stupid enough to fall for that, but surely after viewing the following information, even a head of cabbage would hesitate to open any attachment:

(Yeh, I smudged some of the info in this image expanded header.)

Of course, if I’d been either operating Thunderbird Portable in a sandbox or viewing my mail in a Mint or PCBSD VM at the time, I’d have played around with the attachment a bit. As it is, I didn’t even open it in a sandbox with a text editor. Why play with it when I know I’d just end up deleting it anyway?

So I did. Just delete it. With extreme prejudice.

(BTW, I regularly use an “eraser” utility to scrub any files quarantined by AV, as well as to scrub both free space on my drives and page files on boot. Just sayin’.)

Twilight Zone Stuff

Today, I finally got my desk cleaned off. Well, almost. Four times today I’ve had my keyboard drawer cleaned off down to the keyboard and mouse.

Four times.

It’s not cleaned off now.

I swear–seriously!–my desk abhors a vacuum. Clean it off? “Stuff” creeps out from some space in some interstice between universes and plops itself on my desk. Really. Today, I found some pictures–just sitting out in the open on my desk–that I HAVE NOT SEEN FOR 12 YEARS. Pictures of me that I had been SURE I’d thrown out (because, like every picture I ever had taken for a yearbook–these as a teacher–they were ugly as sin, that is, looked exactly like me. *heh*). My Wonder Woman asked me to give her one of them, because she’d never seen them before (and has the typical perceptual problem of Good Women: she is unable to see just how ugly I am :-)).

Cue Rod Serling.

“It Doesn’t Take a Rocket Surgeon”

Yeh, every time I hear or read a mangled expression like that (“It doesn’t take a rocket surgeon”) I know the speaker or writer perhaps has access to a lot of words, but the synapses connecting sound with meaning just aren’t there.

And that, my friends, is what I experience 99% of the time a politician opens his mouth: sound and fury, signifying nothing. Or worse, mangled beyond meaninglessness. But wait! There’s more! Over at Take Me to Your Lizard, I ran across this description of the Giant Step From Reality that is The 0!’s public speaking:

…all this seemed familiar to me, listening to him speak and watching how people reacted to his voice. It took a while but then I remembered why. Obama has the same ability as Saruman, the supposedly good wizard gone very, very bad in Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings trilogy to lull the weak-minded with his voice. In the second book, The Two Towers, we find this description of Saruman’s voice on page 183:

…..Suddenly, another voice spoke, low and melodious, its very sound an enchantment. Those who listened unwarily to that voice could seldom report the words that they heard; and if they did, they wondered, for little power remained in them. Mostly they remembered only that it was a delight to hear the voice speaking, all that it said seemed wise and reasonable, and desire awoke in them by swift agreement to seem wise themselves. When others spoke, they seemed harsh and uncouth by contrast; and if they gainsaid the voice, anger was kindled in the hearts of those under the spell. For some the spell only lasted while the voice spoke to them, and when it spoke to another they smiled, as men do who see through a juggler’s trick while others gape at it. For many the sound of the voice alone was enough to hold them enthralled; but for those whom it conquered the spell endured when they were far away, and ever they heard that soft voice whispering and urging them. But none were unmoved; none rejected its pleas and its commands without an effort of mind and will, so long as its master had control of it.

Of course, one must note that at least Saruman began as a good person. One cannot have that assurance about a Chicago politician. But at least now, perhaps I understand a tiny (miniscule, vanishingly small) bit of the comments from folks who rhapsodize about how wonderful a public speaker The 0! is. (But only a wee, teeneintsy tad, cos I’ve never been hypnotized by the man’s supposedly dulcet tones.) I have, since I first heard The 0! speak, thought he was a particularly poor public speaker, because nothing he says makes any sense, and he always seems so… disconnected from what thin content his speeches do contain.

But for some, apparently his voice or something about his presence entrances them, short-circuits what little minds they do possess and leaves them with the impression that something was said.

But for me, his halt, stumblebum delivery and his emotional emptiness coupled with the subliteracy of his teleprompter programmers and the lack of anything actually said has kept me scratching my head up until now. But now I get it, if as “through a glass darkly” (KJV language for “in a cloudy, messed up funhouse mirror” :-)). The complete disconnect between words and meaning and the multiple auto-lobotomies his listeners have subjected themselves to have obviously combined to effect a magic that is quite apart from the rational world of cause and effect. That “magic, entrancing voice” is all simply projection by a bunch of folks who’re NOT nearly as bright as “rocket surgeons” *heh* and so are projecting an illusion of greatness upon the foggy shadow that is The 0!

That’s as close as I can come to grasping why some can actually listen to the same speech I do and come away thinking what they do of the ToTUS’ pet parrot.

That is to say, I still don’t understand it at all, of course. Stupidity that immense is beyond the mind of man to grasp.


My thanks to Nicole, of Autumn People for pointing out the VodkaPundit article that led to the Saruman post.

New Brew

I decided to try something a tad different in my search for a decent, low-cost hard apple cider recipe. Less than $10 for 3 gallons.

–9 “cans” of frozen apple juice (cos where am I going to get cider apples this time of year?) with water to make up only 7 of the cans, for a more “apple-y” flavor.
–3 cups plain ole cane sugar
–4 sticks cinnamon, broken up
–2 cloves
–1 packet of Red Star Premier Cuvee wine yeast (started ahead of time in about 1C of warm cider)

Bring almost to boil and let it simmer a while. Cool to about 105F. Transfer to fermenting bucket (with airlock). Toss the yeast.

I’ll let it go for about a week before I sample a bit. Then, may let it go a week or two longer, depending on how that goes. Transfer to a secondary fermentation bucket and let that sit a week or so, then bottle with a little starter. If this turns out half as well as the last batch, which had a lower apple-to-water ratio, I’ll be pleased.

Fermenting it in a (well-cleaned :-)) kitty litter plastic bucket, modified with a spout near the bottom edge and an air lock. Keeping the brew at about 75-80F.

Thinking of some of this as part of a wedding present, but only some.

“[D]rink… provokes the desire, but it takes away the performance… “–The Scottish Play, somewhere in Act II, I think.

🙂