…as an upgrade from the intellectual prowess of Cwazy Unka Joe Biden, I think I can scare up a bag of hammers (although a sack of $h1t would be a more appropriate upgrade).
Just tryin’ to help the guy out here.
One Reason the Hivemind Hated Him
‘S’all right, Ronnie, the same kind of people hated Him, too (1; 2).
Meanwhile, idolatry strikes again as the National Christmas Tree becomes the National Obamassiah Tree. Hmmm, seems I’ve read about something similar happening in Jewish history…
Yeh, yeh, I know the decos on the National Xmas Tree aren’t all about The Zero, but no one’s been able to find one about Christ or even Christmas on the thing so far, so…
Yee-Haw…
(Wake me when it’s over.) 😉
They really should have titled it, “Cowboys and Outlaws and Indians and… Alien and BEMs*,” but I imagine it would’ve taken a bit to work that onto a marquee.
Just watched the DVD. Not bad for a B- Movie quality script, A and A-minus cast and special effects that shared “best parts of the show” with some horses and a dog (apparently named “Dog” *sigh*).
All-in-all, very nearly worth the $3.27 it took to rent the thing, though I’m not quite sure it was worth the time spent watching it. Although, I must admit it was moderately amusing trying to predict when Daniel Craig’s hat would change from brown to black and back again… in the same scene, often as not. Oh, there were bunches of continuity issues and lame sound effects to go along with the amusingly B- script, so I suppose it was worth the time to watch, just so I could have things to sneer at.
So, would I watch it again? Not sure. I do have a weakness for weak movies, so I might, even given my distaste for “re-runs” (“Seen it” is a phrase my Wonder Woman sometimes tires of hearing *heh*).
The music for the sound track wasn’t bad, and the “making of” bonus material was quite interesting. In fact, more interesting than the movie itself, for me.
*Bug-eyed Monsters
Why I Don’t Trust the Mass MEdia Podpeople Hivemind, #2,386,562
N.B,–not providing links. If you can’t manage to get to the Drudge Report on your own then there’s no hope for you. 🙂
Drudge headliner:
Expand the graphic (just CLICK on it) to also view the link text in the upper left hand corner that reads, “SOLDIERS STRIP, STOMP WOMEN…”
Now, Matt Drudge is pretty much THE editor for internet news conglomeration and generally shows the most balanced, eclectic offering from all points of view. As such, he’s several orders of magnitude more “fair and balanced” than FoxABCNBCCBSMSNCCNN, etc. But I still think he misses the boat on this one.
First, look carefully at the picture, or better yet, this larger version (again, CLICK to expand):
Now, I’m not disagreeing with the characterization offered by the widely-proffered terms, “brutal” and even perhaps “vicious” but the “reports” offer mostly editorializing and downplay the context to the point that no one reading the linked articles can have any way of telling what the women featured in the photos were really doing prior to the sob sister photos. One report has women “beaten” with “poles” when all I could see were standard (for many police and security forces in that part of the world) batons. And the primary Drudge link to the story “Brave women of the Middle east… ” etc., has its lede culminate with, “a man kicks her with full force in her exposed chest.”
I look at that picture and don’t see a man kicking the woman “with full force in her exposed chest.” Indeed, the person preparing the kick/stomp in that photo appears could actually be a woman wearing non-standard garb that shares only the headgear with the men in uniform dragging the woman (from where, why?–we don’t know because the story doesn’t provide that context). Since every other person in every photo I’ve seen of the events (this and other) who is supposedly a member of the military is obviously a man and in uniform, I honestly do not know what to make of what appears to be a woman out of uniform (but in an odd combination of lilac tennies, non-standard cammo and some sort of vest that doesn’t match the other uniformed persons standing around), wearing only one piece of gear that looks similar to the soldiers’ gear… being labeled as one of the soldiers and as a man.
There were other photos that were less ambiguous (though still presented out of context with inflammatory language captions), which is one reason the anomalies are so glaring in this one.
Why use this photo and caption and comment on it with such inflammatory language, while completely ignoring the anomalies and glossing over or completely eliminating the context? Because it fits the narrative the Hivemind wants to present.
Was army response brutal? Well, duh. Armies are for breaking things and killing people. Was it inappropriate? From the information provided (and yes, I watched the video at the end of the main link from Drudge), there’s no way for any honest, thinking person to be able to tell. At least the “horrors” *cough* shown in the photos and video were extremely mild for an Islamic culture.
Skepticism whenever exposed to the Hivemind is not just healthy, it’s become an essential survival response, IMO.
Exceedingly Fair* Fare
Those of you familiar with the tune (Holst’s CRANHAM) will automatically hear the words it’s usually associated with**. For those who don’t *sigh*, well, there’s always Google… or, here ya go.
The tune always reminds me that it really needs an artist (no, not what passes for an “artist” with the typical recording industry exec, a real one) to make it work for me with Christina Rossetti’s words, especially since singing the tune with the last verse of Rossetti’s poem is problematic. The meter of the tune and the meter of that last verse do not marry well, you see. But, Tine Thing Helseth makes me forget all that.
An absolutely beautiful performance. It’s from her Christmas album, My Heart Is Ever Present. It’s a strong argument of the presence of imago dei in real art.
I could listen to this all day long.
An Improvement to Look Forward To?
Clearly, if we had people like this in Congress and the White House, it’d be a massive improvement in talent, intelligence and wholesome contribution to our society–especially if this were how they spent their time instead of engaging in plots to convert citizens into subjects.
Unfortunately, a less-talented outlaw mariachi version of this is what we may have to look forward to as the highest standard of “feddle gummint” rulers within a couple of decades.
“Do you dream in chocolate?”
My Wonder Woman’s response to the Lindor Chocolate commercial that asks, “Do you dream in chocolate?” was, “No! That would be messy! I dream in bed.”
Gottaloveher.
It Seems Obvious, Now That It’s Mentioned…
Jerry Pournelle has frequently said (in various ways),
As to the role of the federal government in education, the proper role is for the Congress to set up, in the District of Columbia, the best system of education it can devise, and let that be a beacon to the world. And if it cannot do that, it ought to abandon the pretense that it knows how to run schools In Kansas City, Missouri, or Mineral Well, Mississippi, or anywhere else.
The feds have no legitimate business whatsoever meddling in local schools, tinkering with the education process. Period. As Pournelle says, until they can operate ONE school district well–the only one they have a clear mandate to supervise–the feds don’t even have a reasonable excuse for messing about in our local schools. As it is, the D.C. pubschools are THE clearest example demonstrating the failure of the feds to have anything worth contributing to local schools.
BTW, the link above is to a post that meanders through several topics, all of current interest and all cogently reasoned. Worth reading.
It Ain’t Exactly the Hokey Pokey ;-)–Updated
Take three steps back; take one step forward…
I think we’ve finally found the paint colors we want to use on the walls and cabinets. Oh, and the two shelves on the former “coffee shrine” have eight hours dry time before the next three paints can be applied, then a few more past that before the first top coat of sealer. Looks to be the end of the week, at least, before the walnut shelf supports can be reinstalled and my Wonder Woman’s baskets (which we picked up Saturday) can all be put in place. But by that time, the walls, at least, should be painted. Not promising the cabinets by then. Nuh-uh. I know better than that. 🙂
N.B. This post was really just an excuse to use the new drag ‘n’ drop file upload capabilities of WordPress 3.3. Didn’t work. Oh, well.
OK, now the new paint color for the walls is on one section that can be seen in the pic below. It’s also “sampled” on a cabinet door. Nope. Not painting the cabinets that color. Under-cabinet lighting: almost finished. Shelves on former “coffee shrine” (to the left of the microwave): finished (a piece of trim still needs to be reattached to the left side of that semi-open cabinet). The window area is still a mess, and where I had built a desk attached to the counter area (from long ago days of yore when my Wonder Woman needed a dedicated but open area for a desktop computer–long story) is awaiting removal so a plate rack and new, small (about same size as the former one) “coffee shrine” can go in on the dining side of the counter top.
Fun.
At Least It Wasn’t On “Black Friday”
Aside from the “reporter’s” lack of ability to write plain English*, this is, well, I’ll let y’all decide just what it is:
Woman Caught Making Meth Inside S. Tulsa Walmart
* “…lack of ability to write plain English”? Well, the whole thing is written on about a sixth grader’s prose level, but “Police say surveillance video shows Halfmoon had been in the store since noon. Six hours later security noticed she was acting suspicious [sic], so they called Tulsa Police.” *gag*
Laying aside the other content (SIX HOURS LATER “security” noticed something wonky?), “security noticed she was acting suspicious” indicates, as parsed in standard English, that SHE was suspicious of something. What the subliterate moron who penned the line means, though, is that “she was acting suspiciousLY” (“was acting” modified by the adverb “suspiciously” not the adjective, “suspicious”).
And then there’s that whole “time out of joint” thing with tenses in the lede. “Tulsa police arrest a woman for mixing chemicals to make meth inside a south Tulsa Walmart on Thursday.” No, dumbass, past tense: arrested.
So, we have a report of someone attempting to manufacture meth IN a WallyWorld written by an unethical subliterate who is apparently paid to write prose that negatively influences the literacy of others. A _professional_ taking money for doing substandard work like this is, IMO, a thief. Both persons should be jailed. Maybe they could share a cell. And some drugs.