What to get a Liberalist for Christmas

Heck, get me some-a this, too, wouldya?
I don’t often do this, but in fortuitous (or well-planned) simultaneity with Michelle Malkin’s latest book, Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild, comes Do As I Say (Not As I Do) : Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy
These books seem like a nice coupla stocking-stuffers for Liberalist realtives (I have more of those, over-educated, under-exposed to the real world Northern Exposure relatives. God love ’em).
I got an email blurb about Do As I Say (Not As I Do) : Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy and after reading just the blurb, I decided to steal the promo copy and re-post some of it here. If it’s any indication at all of the contents, I’d like to tie Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Teddy Kennedy and their ilk down and force-read it to them until their faces turn blue and their heads explode.
I’ll be the one wearing the hazmat suit. Herewith the blurb:


Among the eye-opening revelations of “Do As I Say”:

  • Filmmaker Michael Moore insists that corporations are evil and claims he doesn’t invest in the stock market due to moral principle. But Moore’s IRS forms, viewed by Schweizer, show that over the past five years he has owned shares in such corporate giants as Halliburton, Merck, Pfizer, Sunoco, Tenet Healthcare, Ford, General Electric and McDonald’s.
  • Staunch union supporter Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) has received the Cesar Chavez Award from the United Farmworkers Union. But the $25 million Northern California vineyard she and her husband own is a non-union shop.

The hypocrisy doesn’t end there. Pelosi has received more money from the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees union than any other member of Congress in recent election cycles.

But the Pelosis own a large stake in an exclusive hotel in Rutherford, Calif. It has more than 250 employees. But none of them are in a union, according to Schweizer, author of “The Bushes: Portrait of a Dynasty” and a regular contributor to the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and other periodicals.

The Pelosis are also partners in a restaurant chain called Piatti, which has 900 employees. The chain is – that’s right, a non-union shop.

  • Ralph Nader is another liberal who claims that unions are essential to protect worker rights. But when an editor of one of his publications tried to form a union to ameliorate miserable working conditions, the editor was fired and the locks changed on the office door.
  • Self-described socialist Noam Chomsky has described the Pentagon as “the most vile institution on the face of the earth” and lashed out against tax havens and trusts that benefit only the rich.

But Chomsky has been paid millions of dollars by the Pentagon over the last 40 years, and he used a venerable law firm to set up his irrevocable trust to shield his assets from the IRS.

  • Air America radio host Al Franken says conservatives are racist because they lack diversity and oppose affirmative action. But fewer than 1 percent of the people he has hired over the past 15 years have been African-American.
  • Ted Kennedy has fought for the estate tax and spoken out against tax shelters. But he has repeatedly benefited from an intricate web of trusts and private foundations that have shielded most of his family’s fortune from the IRS.

One Kennedy family trust wasn’t even set up in the U.S., but in Fiji.

Another family member, environmentalist Robert Kennedy Jr., has said that it is not moral to profit from natural resources. But he receives an annual check from the family’s large holdings in the oil industry.

  • Barbra Streisand has talked about the necessity of unions to protect a “living wage.” But she prefers to do her filming and postproduction work in Canada, where she can pay less than American union wages.
  • Bill and Hillary Clinton have spoken in favor of the estate tax, and in 2000 Bill vetoed a bill seeking to end it. But the Clintons have set up a contract trust that allows them to substantially reduce the amount of inheritance tax their estate will pay when they die.

Hillary, for her part, has written and spoken extensively about the right of children to make major decisions regarding their own lives. But she barred 13-year-old daughter Chelsea from getting her ears pierced and forbid the teen from watching MTV or HBO.

  • Billionaire Bush-basher George Soros says the wealthy should pay higher, more progressive tax rates. But he holds the bulk of his money in tax-free overseas accounts in Curacao, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands.

Schweizer writes: “Liberals claim to support affirmative action but don’t practice it. They support higher taxes but set up complicated tax shelters to avoid paying them. They claim to be ardent environmentalists but abandon their cause when it impinges on their own property rights.

“The reality is that liberals like to preach in moral platitudes. They like to condemn ordinary Americans and Republicans for a whole host of things – racism, lack of concern for the poor, polluting the environment, and greed.

“But when it comes to applying those same standards to themselves, liberals are found to be shockingly guilty of hypocrisy.

“The media and the American people need to hold them accountable.”


I guess I’ll be putting these books on my Amazon Wishlist along with this:

…and this:

mini-micro-Beer_brewery

No, I REFUSE to pr0n-pun this post title

<;/a>
parisscrewing7gn
Originally uploaded by mnmus.

Yeh, yeh: ever since I saw this posted at Parrot Check with the title “Paris Hilton Screwing By the Pool” I’ve been highly conflicted. Puke? Laugh myself silly (surely a redundancy) and then puke? Succomb to the temptation to mimic his post title in my own?

I never have understood the Paris Hilton thing. Someone is famous for being a rich slut? What’s going on there? She’s just Madonna without the recording contracts (of course, she may well sing better than Madonna, but that’s damning with faint and merely potential praise. A gutted tomcat sings better than Madonna).

Well, here is it, anyway. The stupidest pun-on-a-pic I’ve seen on a blog yet. Congrats, Parrot Check. That’s (seriously) quite an accomplishment. No one and nothing was damaged by the thing, save for whatever eyes actually look at the pic.

Stop the ACLU–voter fraud edition

Here’s a lil treat from “Gribbit” while Jay, of Stop the ACLU, is occupied “out of town”…

**************************************************

In recent days we have been bombarded with news concerning the Bush Administration and its troubles with the Valerie Plame idiocy. And as tempting as it is to talk about that and Rep. Tom Delay’s victories in Texas, this is a subject oriented blog and this is Stop The ACLU BlogBurst Thursday.

It seems from my email alerts that the Most Dangerous Organization in America is concerning themselves mainly with voter ID requirements in various states and prayers being said in local council meetings. Don’t these idiots have a life?

Read more…

From the ACLU:

ALBUQUERQUE –The American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico filed a lawsuit today asking a federal court to declare Albuquerque’s recently passed Voter ID Amendment “unconstitutional, illegal, null and void.”

The new law requires people who vote in person to present a “current valid identification card containing the voter’s name and photograph.” Among the acceptable forms of identification are a driver’s license, a credit card, and a voter identification card issued by the City Clerk. Absentee voters are exempt from any photo ID requirements.

“If you’re poor or homeless, there’s a good chance you don’t have any of the permissible forms of identification,” said ACLU Executive Director Peter Simonson. “Wealth shouldn’t determine your ability to participate in democracy. Americans shouldn’t have to jump through unnecessary hoops to exercise their constitutionally-guaranteed right to vote.”

Why are people traveling around without identification in the first place. At minimum ID should be carried in the event of an accident. It is a no brainier to require an ID to vote. How else would the elections officials be able to tell if you are who you say you are?

Across this nation we hear stories of people registering their dogs and dead relatives. This is voter fraud. And the simplest solution to combat voter fraud is requiring ID to vote.

The ACLU’s contention that this is an effort to suppress the poor vote which is heavily Democratic is nothing more than a political temper tantrum. The ACLU would like voter registration to remain as is because it allows people to vote more than once.

In other news, the ACLU of Tennessee is asking the 6th District Court of Appeals to uphold a ruling by a lower court which barred “Choose Life” license plates. Excuse me… But didn’t a case like this in Ohio just get settled? And if I’m not mistaken, the Choose Life plates won out.

From the ACLU

CINCINNATI – The American Civil Liberties Union today asked the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold a lower court ruling blocking an anti-abortion specialty license plate in Tennessee, saying that the plate discriminates against opposing viewpoints.

“When the state of Tennessee approved an anti-abortion license plate and failed to do the same for a pro-choice plate, it effectively cut off public discussion,”” said Julie Sternberg, Senior Staff Attorney with the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project, who argued the case today before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. “The lower court made clear that the state cannot open up a forum for public debate on abortion without allowing both sides an equal opportunity to express their position. We are hopeful that the appeals court will do the same.”

The law in question makes a “Choose Life” license plate available to motorists for an annual fee of $35 over and above the basic costs of registering a car in the state. Fifty percent of all funds raised, after expenses, go to a private anti-choice organization called New Life Resources. The legislature twice rejected an amendment that would have authorized a “Pro Choice”” specialty plate.

This is the same old argument against the right of a state to govern themselves. The members of Politburo take every opportunity to trample on the states’ 10th guarantees by getting a panel of black robed Kings by Committee to make decisions as to what is best for the citizens; taking away the power of guaranteed them through the system of representative government.

The people have representatives to their state governments to make decisions like these. And when necessary, the people themselves take a popular vote on issues. But God forbid if the people or their elected officials make a decision which differs from the ACLU’s agenda. Ooops, I’m sorry, we can’t mention God. But we can mention Satan, Allah, the Spirits of the 4 winds, or any other Deity just as long as it isn’t God or mentions the name Jesus.

Specialty license places are used to raise money for various charities. >From protecting the wildlife of a state to private organizations, people select these plates to show their support of the cause. This is the vary argument made in the Ohio case.

Moving on we get to the Cobb County prayer case. The ACLU has their panties in a twist over a prayer being said using the words, “in the name of my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.” Oh no! A town dares to challenge the ACLU over religion! Savages… Don’t they know that rules of PC tolerance forbids the mention of the Judeo/Christian Deity?

Cobb County is fighting the ACLU suit by filing a 50 page brief. In the brief, the County makes a point of fact, “As a matter of historical fact, the exact prayers given in the first Congress explicitly referred to Jesus Christ.”

As we have seen in this past year if a historical context can be attached to a religious reference it is permissible. The US Supreme Court ruled in July that a memorial containing the 10 Commandments could remain in front of a court house citing its historical context.

So if it is permissible for the House of Representatives of the United States to refer to the Christian savior in its first session, what right has anyone to tell a local government that they cannot follow that tradition? None.

It seems to me that these idiots can be pursuing cases where real civil liberties are being violated. Wait, that is over with isn’t it. The government of the United States no longer discriminates against anyone regardless of race, creed, national origin, sex, sexual preference, or handicap. So they haven’t any real horse in a race. So they remain relevant by prosecuting legal actions against local governments. And in this way, they put forward their founder’s vision for America. “Communism is the goal.” – Roger Baldwin 1935.

This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please register at Our Portal, or email Jay at Jay@stoptheaclu.com. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 115 blogs already onboard.

A Civics Lesson?

I found this over at GM's Corner, posted by Woody, and just followed the bread crumbs and…

I started wondering about civics knowledge of the typical American citizen. Googling provides a superficial infoset about the topic that nevertheless supports a day-to-day impression formed by exposure to my fellow citizens, especially whenever political topics are being discussed.

"In the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and the wave of patriotism that has followed, there has been renewed concern about the state of civics education, citizen formation, and national character in the United States. Yet according to the most recent National Assessment of Educational Progress test in civics, only 24 percent of high school seniors were "proficient" in their knowledge of American government and civics.[1] Study after study since then continues to suggest that historical literacy is at a similarly abysmal level.” [Federalism and Fiscal Responsibility: A Lesson in Civics Education]

In fact, as I drilled down deeper into the information at the source of the statement above, I found… a lot of mush and obfuscation hiding the core data. And a lot of euphemistic interpretation of the data.

Not a good sign. When educrats bloviate (when do they not?), it’s a sure sign they’re trying to hide or twist bad news.

Well, I decided to take the "citizenship quizes" that Woody linked to in a post he mentioned in the one that started this lil wander through the web. (Convoluted enough for you, yet?) Here's what resulted from the first lil quiz:

You Passed the US Citizenship Test

Congratulations – you got 10 out of 10 correct!

Sadly, I know high school-and college!-grads who would definitely miss some of those very easy quiz questions, but I wasn’t satisfied, so I took the other two quizes mentioned. The results of those quizes are below the fold (if it works right this time-heh).

But here’s another lil quiz that’s perhaps a better indicator of whether or not a person should be allowed to vote (yeh, I said that, and I meant it). It’s an online practice quiz offered to help immigrants prep for a citizenship test. I'm thinking that if a person born a citizen in these United States can't pass this test, they should be given a Green Card and be treated as a resident non-citizen. *sheesh* Seriously, if I weren’t able to pass a 100Q quiz as easy as this one by seventh grade, I would have flunked my seventh grade civics class. And NO ONE lacking such basic knowledge of civics American style ought to be allowed in a voting booth. They’re too stupid and ignorant to exercise the franchise.

(Linked at GM’s Corner’s Open Trackback Wednesday.
Read more…

Here are the results of two other simple “citizenship quizes” Woody linked that I took (simply copied and pasted the text of the results. And note that I do know Rhenquist is no longer Chief Justice of the SCOTUS :-):

*****************************************************

You might be surprised to learn that immigrants usually know more about our nation than most born-and-bred Americans! Want more? Try the sample citizenship questions posed by the Immigration & Naturalization Service.

Your Score: 10 out of 10 — Congratulations! You’re a model citizen.

1. What country did we fight during the Revolutionary war?

a) Great Britain
b) France
c) Germany
d) Italy

You chose: a
The correct answer is: a

2. Why did the Pilgrims come to America?

a) to flee colonization
b) for religious freedom
c) for the right to vote
d) for a better life

You chose: b
The correct answer is: b

3. Who helped the Pilgrims in America?

a) the slaves
b) the Native Americans
c) the British
d) the Dutch

You chose: b
The correct answer is: b

4. Which list contains three rights or freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights?

a) Right to life, Right to liberty, Right to the pursuit of happiness
b) Freedom of speech, Freedom of press, Freedom of religion
c) Right to protest, Right to protection under the law, Freedom of religion
d) Freedom of religion, Right to elect representatives, Human rights

You chose: b
The correct answer is: b

5. Who is the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court?

a) George W. Bush
b) Janet Reno
c) Colin Powell
d) William Rehnquist

You chose: d
The correct answer is: d

6. How many changes or amendments are there to the Constitution?

a) 10
b) 13
c) 27
d) 9

You chose: c
The correct answer is: c

7. How many voting members are in the House of Representatives?

a) 50
b) 100
c) 435
d) 535

You chose: c
The correct answer is: c

8. Who becomes President of the United States if the President and the Vice President should die?

a) the Speaker of the House of Representatives
b) the Senate Majority Leader
c) the Chairman of the Joints Chief of Staff
d) the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

You chose: a
The correct answer is: a

9. Who has the power to declare war?

a) Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
b) the Supreme Court
c) President
d) the Congress

You chose: d
The correct answer is: d

10. What are the first 10 amendments to the Constitution called?

a) Articles of Confederation
b) Manifest Destiny
c) Bill of Rights
d) Declaration of Independence

You chose: c
The correct answer is: c

Quiz

U.S. Citizenship Test: Could You Pass?
Way to Go!
(Note: In the actual test, answers are given in sentence format; here we’ve changed the format by offering multiple-choice answers.) You got 11/11 correct.
1

Correct!
The correct answer: A They represent the 13 original colonies
Your answer: A They represent the 13 original colonies
The stripes on the American flag represent the 13 original colonies; the 50 stars represent the current states in the nation.
2

Correct!
The correct answer: C 27
Your answer: C 27
Over the years, there have been 27 amendments to the Constitution–the most recent one was ratified on May 2, 1992.
3

Correct!
The correct answer: A Legislative, executive, and judicial
Your answer: A Legislative, executive, and judicial
The three branches of the United States government are the legislative, executive, and judicial.
4

Correct!
The correct answer: B It ordered that slaves in rebel territory be freed
Your answer: B It ordered that slaves in rebel territory be freed
The Emancipation Proclamation ordered that all slaves in rebel territory be freed. It was issued on January 1, 1863, by President Abraham Lincoln.
5

Correct!
The correct answer: C The Speaker of the House of Representatives
Your answer: C The Speaker of the House of Representatives
The Speaker of the House of Representatives becomes president of the United States if both the president and vice president die. During the country’s history, the line of succession has changed several times.
6

Correct!
The correct answer: C United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Russia, and China
Your answer: C United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Russia, and China
The United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Russia, and China were principal allies of the United States during World War II.
7

Correct!
The correct answer: A Alaska
Your answer: A Alaska
Alaska was admitted as the 49th state of the Union on January 3, 1959.
8

Correct!
The correct answer: A 9
Your answer: A 9
Nine justices sit on the Supreme Court of the United States: eight associate justices and one chief justice. The president of the United States appoints them to the Court for life terms, but the U.S. Senate must approve each appointment with a majority vote.
9

Correct!
The correct answer: C “The Star-Spangled Banner”
Your answer: C “The Star-Spangled Banner”
“The Star-Spangled Banner” is the national anthem of the United States. Francis Scott Key wrote the text in 1814, and it later became popular as a song, sung to the tune of a British drinking song. Congress approved it as our national anthem on March 3, 1931.
10

Correct!
The correct answer: C 1787
Your answer: C 1787
The Constitution was written in 1787 and ratified in 1788.
11

Correct!
The correct answer: B Mayflower
Your answer: B Mayflower
The Pilgrims came to America aboard the Mayflower. A good way to remember this one is the old joke: If April showers bring May flowers, what do Mayflowers bring? The Pilgrims. Originally, the Pilgrims intended to take two vessels, the Mayflower and the Speedwell, but the latter proved unseaworthy.

Losers

🙂
Whenever I have a visit from one of the Demoncrapic Underpants genetic experiments gone terribly wrong (think: loony left moonbat troll), I allow myself a small grin and think, “Loser.”
It’s easy on this day of the year to let that grin grow a little larger. Why? (Slap yourself upside the head, silly!) One year ago this lil accomplishment made it muuuch easier to grin and think “Loser” whenever a moonbat troll began barking nonsense:
heh
h.t. for the link, Carol Platt Liebau
(Still, it’d be nice if the Republican’t congresscritters and the Bush White House would act as though they’d like, you know, won an election or something. As though, I dunno, they had a majority in both houses or some such… )
Linked at MOTWOT at Stop the ACLU and NIF’s Morning After.

“Once More, With Feeling”

I saw this musical episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer when the show was in re-runs (well, I guess it still is, somewhere) and thought it was… surprisingly good. In fact, I wouldn’t mind owning a video/DVD of just this episode. Very, very good musical parody/compilation that served the storyline well. A good thing since the story was a tad lame—though not as lame as some opera. *heh* I’m not all that cranked up about the rest of the series, but this episode is a lot of fun. Now, the book’s out: script, sheet music, notes on dialog/musical references (although I do think I caught ’em all).

“Once More, With Feeling”: The Script Book

Fun stuff. Wanna get it for me for Christmas? *VBG*
BTW, a tip o’ the hat to Lovely Daughter for cluing me in on this. 🙂

“…out of the mainstream…”

Just caught Charles Schumer commenting that “[Alito] is considerably out of the mainstream on a number of cases…”

*sigh*

Cluebat #1 for Chuckie: that’s why federal judges/justices have life apointments, you know, so they won’t feel pressured to decide cases according to the latest poll but rather according to that strange thing you apparently never consider (except, perhaps, in the “what can I get away with” sense), you know, the law.

Cluebat #2 for Chuckie: ya ever think that YOUR “mainstream”… isn’t? No, of course you haven’t. Why would I even ask…

Glad I wasn’t physically present when Chuckie was proving his stupidity, cos I am constitutionally unable to suffer a fool gladly.

Experimenting on myself…

Chai Latte-esque

heh

Lately, I’ve been drinking some chai latte drinks. (For those who need a translation, “chai” is just the latest faddish way to say “tea”—yeh, I know all the linguistic gobbledegook. It’s still just a faddish way to say “tea”). And “latte” is the la-di-da way to say “milk”.

But the chai lattee drinks I’ve been introduced to by Lovely Daughter are a tad more complex than the old milk-in-tea (or cream-in-tea) I used to drink. Kind of a “la-di-da” version of my mom’s old spiced tea recipe with a few twists.

But the mixes and pre-mixed liquids all seemed just a little too “not me,” if you will . So, I’m sipping my first effort at approximating a chai latte drink from scratch.

Ingredients

  • 6 individual serving bags of green tea
  • 12 cloves of, well, cloves
  • 6 cardamom pods
  • 1 stick of cinnamon, ground finely (about a tablespoon or a little less)
  • milk
  • honey
  • water (12 “coffee cups” or 12X 6-oz~ Just 2 quarts and an 8-oz measuring cup)

Doing the deed

  • Opened the bags and dumped the tea into the filter basket of our drip coffee maker. Added the ground cinnamon on top.
  • Crushed the cardamom pods to release the seeds; crushed the cloves.
  • Tied (well, stapled) the cloves and cardamom in some of the emptied paper tea bags and dropped them into my coffee carafe.
  • Brewed as for coffee.
  • When the brewing was done, I let the cardamom/clove bags steep a bit (5 minutes?) and removed them.
  • Nuked about 4-oz of milk in a mug for 30 seconds
  • Added a tablespoonful of coffee creamer (I like the texture of CoffeeMate, and its no-fat version is as smooth as the regular, so… )
  • Topped off with spiced tea from the carafe, sweetened to tste with honey.

Not bad. Needs something citrus, though.  Maybe dried lemon peel or dried orange peel. Maybe a tad more or less on the spices. It’ll be fun experimenting.

As it is, though, good enough for a warmer-upper on a fall day/evening. It’s not coffee, but it’s… nice.

Update: Second cup tried no milk, just creamer. Hmmm, a tad better. Maybe I should try it with cream sometime. Still needs some dried lemon or orange peel, I think.

Update #2: Oops. Forgot. Added just a pinch of nutmeg to the top of the tea leaves before brewing. Nutmeg just seems to enhance the high notes the cardamom adds.