Raspberries…

Yeh, I’m blowin’ ’em at Windows right now.

*sigh*

So, I wanna have SATA on an old (no, really: OLD) Win2K machine. So what do I do? Easy: buy a PCI SATA controller card and install the thing. But since I only want to add another drive, not replace the ones I have, I bought a controller card that would not interfere, as some unfortunately still do, with my primary IDE channels on on that machine.

Install (after checking the jumpers to make SURE it installs correctly) and sure enough, the hardware recognizes it. Windows notices a new piece of hardware and prompts me for the driver, which I have already plopped into the floppy drive. Everything installs as smoothely as can be. Reboot and… man the boot process is taking a looooonnnng time!

Hmmm… 15 minutes to boot. (I know, cos I just let it sit until it booted on through. No problem; I had another machine to work on.)

Checked for the drive I have attached. No drive found. Hmmm… Checked in device manager. Yep. The SATA/Ultra IDE card is there, listed as working, no problems. Update the driver anyway.

Reboot. Loooooonnnnng boot time.

This is crap.

Bag that. Pop a Puppy Linux live CD in. Boot. Hmmm… Normal boot time for a Puppy Live CD. Sees the card just fine. Open a Media Manager window and there’s the drive. Mount it. Browse around, make directories, transfer files, etc., just fine.

Was, naturally, a Win2K problem. Now I need to attempt installing the card/drive on a newer machine with WinZP [*heh* just noticed the”WinZP” typo. You know what I meant]. Probably will be fine, but man… *sigh* I guess I need to dual boot the old Win2K machine in Win2K and Puppy for a while.

Thing is, Puppy’s running from a 68MB CD, loading in RAM and then using another 500MB of disk space (plus 1GB for programs I install) as a swap file.

And running just fine. And using the extra drive on the SATA card. Lil down under Linux “hobby” distro blowing by Win2K Pro.

Not all that surprising, really. Can’t expect a bloated giant to be nimble enough to both watch out for newer tech and be backward compatible at the same time.

I guess.

*heh*

(Yeh, OK, one gripe: for some reason I’m not getting Opera browser to load in this session of Puppy. I think maybe I didn’t install it on this machine the last time I had a Puppy Live CD in it. So, I’m having to use the crappy Seamonkey 1.0.4 Mozilla browser. *yech* Oh. Well. At least even it is better than Internet Exploder. Speaking of which–ya seen the crappy tabbed browsing implementation in IE7? What a joke. Enough rants. Outa here.)

More of that damned global warming…

Snow.

And more snow.

It’s “global warming” dontcha know.

Now, before climate alarmists start whining that it’s not fair to cite local conditions to support an argument against global warming, let me remind any who might erroneously wander by twc thinking a reference to global warming will earn them a warm reception, global warmists, climate alarmists are steeped in the “special cases” argument, whereby they make errors of composition.

“The antarctic ice cap is melting!” Yeh, and the sky is falling, too. So? Global warmists have made much of the fact that ONE portion of the Antarctic ice cap is melting… while ignoring the fact that the large majority of the Antarctic ice fields are growing, and at a greater rate than ice is being lost elsewhere.

On balance, the Antarctic ice fields are greater than five or ten years ago, but that doesn’t stop global warmists from screaming, “The ice is melting! The ice is melting!”

Local conditions.

Now, should I cite the studies I read that demonstrate that the global warming alarmists are liars? Nah. Useless. Senator James Imhoffe tried that in his speeches from the Senate floor (the texts, available here, are replete with credible citations). What did that net Imhoffe? About the same that it nets any scientist—anyone, no really, anyone—who dares to flaunt the global climate alarmist party line. As you’ll read in the linked articles, some global warmists are calling for “Nuremburg trials” for “global warming deniers” and equating them with Holocaust deniers.

Scum. That’s what anyone who believes there ought to be open, rational examination of the facts is: scum. Anathema. Evil.

So, let’s just not go there. Why, without any thought whatsoever (or, actually, via lobotomizing ourselves and eliminating rational thought) we can beat the global warmists at their own game by irrationally arguing every little cold wave is proof positive that they are wrong.

Makes as much sense as global warmists’ lies.

Dumbasses.

OTA/Are you pondering what I’m pondering, Pinky?

Pinky and the Brain, Vol. 1

Pinky and the Brain, Vol. 1

This is an open trackbacks post, open Friday through Sunday. Link to this post and then track back. If you want to host your own linkfests, check out the Open Trackbacks Alliance.

Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at Linkfest Haven.

Linkfest Haven


Well, I’m not planning to take over the world, in the manner of the Brain, but I have been pondering several things recently. Continue reading “OTA/Are you pondering what I’m pondering, Pinky?”

Stop the ACLU

Crossposted from Stop The ACLU

Imagine if a Church used the power of its tax exemption as a lever towards political campaigns. Can you imagine the outrage from groups like the ACLU if a Church used its tax exempt donations to create political ads opposing candidates that did not adhere to certain “American values” as interpreted by that Church? What if a Christian Religious organization were to use its official title to oppose certain political issues such as abortion?

We don’t have to imagine, the ACLU’s history shows us. They would challenge that Church’s tax exempt status.

In 1970, the year after the ACLU issued its first policy opposing the tax exempt status for churches; it accepted the advice of church and state extremist Leo Pfeffer and drafted a brief opposing tax exemptions in Waltz v. Tax Commission. In 1987, the ACLU Foundation and the New York Civil Liberties Union filed an amicus brief in support of Abortion Rights Mobilization to secure standing in a suit challenging the tax exempt status of the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church was charged with violating its tax-exempt status by taking a stand against abortion.”Source

Continue reading “Stop the ACLU”

T-13, 1.3

From youth to what now feels like semi-senescence *heh*, I’ve held a variety of jobs. So? Here’re 13 of them, in no particular order. I could have included a number of others–including ditch digger–though I never had to do exactly what Tennessee Ernie Ford sang about in “Sixteen Tons”. 😉

1. Pocket presser.

2. Broom-pusher & toilet swabby.

3. Chess tutor.

4. Voice coach.

5. School bus driver.

6. Youth minister

7. Music director.

8. Pizza delivery.

9. Newspaper delivery (route).

10. Bit Bucket Tuner.

11. School teacher.

12. Silk screener for ad art.

13. Insurance agent.

Linked to the Thursday Thirteen “hub” post for this week.

Fair Tax/OTA Wednesday

More important mthan North Korean nuclear bombs: the Fair Tax. Seriously. In addition to being an Open Trackbacks Alliance post, this is also a Fair Tax blogburst post. Link to this post and then track back. If you want to host your own linkfests, check out the Open Trackbacks Alliance.

Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at Linkfest Haven.

Linkfest Haven

taxcompsum.jpg

by TD of The Right Track

As I see it, the main problem with the Income Tax is that it is virtually impossible to enforce completely and fairly. Compliance with the Income Tax depends on taxpayer truthfulness, which generally is motivated either by a) good character, or b) fear of an IRS audit. With the FairTax, the tax is collected when the money is spent, from everyone, with greatly reduced opportunities for non-compliance by the public.

For instance, what about the criminal element in our country? Have you ever heard of the Mafia? Or the drug dealer? Do you think that these people report 100% of their income? Of course not! They get out of paying a huge percentage of their actual tax bill by the simple expedient of not reporting all of their income. But these same individuals still have to pay utility bills, purchase prescription drugs, visit doctors, and buy food. And if they believe in the “high life” of new cars, fancy clothes and jewelry, and new homes, they’re going to pay more than “Joe Six-pack” who chooses to drive a used car, or purchase a home that’s not brand new.

And it’s not just individuals who are managing to avoid paying taxes these days. Everyone in America has heard of the rush to move American companies “offshore”, whether in whole or in part. Think about it — have you ever seen an American-flagged commercial vessel? Oh sure, we’ve got our warships, but what about commercial boats that carry cargo or cruise passengers? Most of these are flying the flag of Liberia or Panama — low-tax nations.

In the mid-1950s, about 33% of all income taxes collected were paid by American corporations. Today that number is down to approximately 10%. From “The FairTax Book” by Boortz and Linder:

“That plunge is a major factor in our recent soaring deficits. Indeed, international corporations are essentially “voluntary” taxpayers today, paying only that amount in taxes that they believe will avoid attracting embarrassing news coverage. These corporations believe that our draconian tax structures make their actions necessary. The OFCs [offshore financial centers, or banks – TD] make their plans feasible” [Emphasis added – TD]

Boortz and Linder make the point that if we eliminated all taxes on capital and labor, (which the FairTax does), the United States would become the world’s tax haven.

We have the most stable economy, the most liquid and trusted markets, and the highest rates of labor productivity in the world — and the trillions of dollars in those OFCs would flow back home to the United States for the very reason they found themselves offshore to start with.

And we’re not just talking about American businesses coming home, we’re talking about wooing corporations based in other countries into America. Think of the economic benefits! More productivity, lower unemployment, higher wages, and all occurring within a tax system that allows you at least partly to choose whether to pay taxes! Buy it new, pay a tax, buy it used and don’t!

The FairTax Blogburst is jointly produced by Terry of The Right Track Blog and Jonathan of Publius Rendezvous. If you would like to host the weekly postings on your blog, please e-mail Terry. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll.

TD

TSA Security Theater/Tuesday Open Post

This is an open trackbacks post. Link to this post and then track back. If you want to host your own linkfests, check out the Open Trackbacks Alliance.

Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at Linkfest Haven.

Linkfest Haven


UPDATE: I recieved a link to the following TSA/Airport security parody last night. It makes a good (wildly exaggerated, perhaps… perhaps) intro to the rant below:

Some very smart people have observed the “security theater” that is the goon squad disingenuously labeled “TSA”. Martin Roesch of Security Sauce has commented,

What are we to suppose is the duty cycle of a baggage screener in a typical American airport with a rate of data flow of 172 passengers per hour with two shoes and two carry-ons per passenger? The screener gets a whopping 5.2 seconds to pattern match for the entire set of bad things per item per passenger. I’m not taking account of time spent in spool up/spool down periods for starting/stopping the belt either, so we’re probably talking about half that effectively. 2.6 seconds. My laptop bag currently contains a PowerBook, Airport Express, digital camera, airplane power adapter, iPod, EVDO PCMCIA card, cell phone, two laptop batteries, 80GB portable firewire hard drive, laptop power adapter and a bag filled with various wires and other widgetry to make it all plug together. Not to mention books, pens and other business stuff. 2.6 seconds to positively identify all of that as non-dangerous. Let’s be generous and call it 3 seconds. If the set of things that need to be detected (signatures) is constrained to guns, knives and bomb materials, I’d say grudgingly that a motivated screener could maintain alertness through their entire period manning the machine to have a reasonable probability of detection of the things in the set of threats. Once you extend that signature set to, well, pretty much everything that’s not paper or cloth you’re going to have an analysts nightmare…

Well, d’oh. Even assuming the mythic “motivated screener,” remember that these workers aren’t necessarily the sharpest knives in the drawer to begin with

My US Marine Corps son returned from Iraq last week with all ten fingers and ten toes (I counted ’em). When his batallion stopped over in Maine for fuel and customs, they ran them through TSA security for some stupid reason before they got back on their rented 747.

Now imagine this, a USMC Lance Corporal with a M16A4, a M249 and a bayonet in a sheath at his belt, going through TSA security. They ignored the machine guns and the foot long bayonet. However, they took away his tube of toothpaste as it violated their rules ! What is the TSA thinking ? My thought is that we have a bunch of idiots in the TSA.

Dumbasses, indeed.

“When a stupid man does something he knows is wrong, he always says it is his duty.”

Is there anyone out there with enough neurons to make a synapse who can honestly say that the security theater the TSA provides really results in any net increase in airport security? Stupid people doing stupid things, stupidly. But that’s all right. The real purpose of the TSA is to train citizens into subjects, sheeple and it does that very well, indeed.

h.t. Chaos Manor Musings

Guard the Borders

[This week’s Guard the Borders post is authored by my “second blogmom” and blog “angel”–the Lady Diane of Diane’s Stuff. It has previously appeared here at third world county as a crosspost from Diane’s Stuff and is now this week’s Guard the Borders featured post.—mnmus]


By Diane of Diane’s Stuff, via third world county

As I’ve said countless times on my own blog, I am not a very political animal. I have my opinions on things of a political nature, but I rarely express them, and I very seldom post on anything political because I don’t feel as if I’m well enough informed on particular issues. I do have an opinion on whether or not there should be a fence along the border between Mexico and the States, and it has always seemed like a very good idea to me.

Living in Texas I see a lot of illegals and every time I see someone that’s clearly Hispanic in front of me in the grocery store, paying for their food with a LoneStar Card (plastic food stamps) or presenting a WIC form, I have to wonder how much of that is going to sustain illegal cousins, brothers, aunts, uncles, etc. I’m not naive enough to think that the only nationality that can use our Southern borders as a crossing is Mexican, but let’s be honest here for a minute; aren’t they the main concern?

I posted some time ago about Governor Rick Perry’s “Virtual Border Watch Program” and I thought that too was a good idea.

With voluntary participation of private landowners, Texas will use $5 million to begin placing hundreds of surveillance cameras along criminal hotspots and common routes used to enter this country. Perry said the cameras will cover vast stretches of farm and ranchland located directly on the border where criminal activity is known to occur, and “not the neighborhoods where families will continue to enjoy their privacy.”

“Landowners will be able to monitor and defend their property from those who might endanger their families. We will make the video feed available to state, local and federal law enforcement agencies so they can respond swiftly and appropriately,” Perry said. “And we will post this video on the Internet – in real time – so that concerned Americans can help protect our nation through online neighborhood watch programs.”

The video will be available 24 hours a day and cameras will be equipped with night vision capabilities. When citizens witness a crime taking place, they will be able to call an 800 number and be routed to the appropriate law enforcement agency.

It just so happens that I have friends who have a 700-acre ranch that also includes a 1/2 mile of river frontage on the Rio Grande. While small by Texas standards, their nearest neighbor is 6 miles away, and the closest town of any size is Presidio where there is a Point of Entry via an International Bridge. Naturally, there is also an Immigration office. This town is approximately 28 miles from my friends’ ranch, and the other nearby towns are Ruidosa, population 19 and Candelaria, population estimated at 55. They don’t live down there, they’re hoping to retire there though, and they go several times a year to camp out and stay for a week or two at a time. Here is a picture taken on their ranch.

And another-

As you can see it’s very isolated.

I was visiting with these friends a few days ago and the conversation got around to the ranch and when they were going again and as I know the property is right on the border I asked their opinion of building a fence. Below is a quote sent to me via email after I’d asked a few more questions prior to beginning this post.

Candelaria is the last town on Hwy 170 or “river road” as it is known. The population there is a bit bigger I would guess around 30 or so. It is about 20 miles or so after Ruidosa. There is a sign when you get there that “State Maintenance Ends Here”. The dirt road goes on from there to El Paso, about 140 miles I was told, but you ain’t gonna get there unless you have a 4 x 4, extra gas and tires. The dirt road is where I was telling you about the trolleys that go across the river and the religious icons stuff set in small caves along the road. People out there still live in adobe houses and have no phone, lights or other essentials. Our very own 3rd world.

Another interesting fact about Candelaria is the foot bridge from the States to Mexico there (not an authorized crossing). The bridge was paid for with Russian humanitarian aid money! Can you believe that shit… 🙂

Once you get past the town they couldn’t even get the equipment in there to build the damn fence. Plus all the cattle ranchers on the river from Presidio on would just cut it to allow their cattle to get to the river for water…. it is the desert after all and water is a very scarce resource. A few are lucky enough to have artesian wells but most rely on what rain water they can trap and the river.

As you can tell from that quote they don’t have much faith in a fence doing any good. I asked then what their opinion of the Minutemen was and was told that “Their hearts are in the right place, and they have the right idea, but they’re spread too thin to do a whole lot of good.” So of course I asked what they thought would work. Guards, guards and more guards. An armed border.

One of the reasons they gave me for this was that even if someone saw the illegal crossers climbing or cutting through a fence, say, via Texas Governor Rick Perry’s camera idea, or the Minutemen calling someone, they would be long gone before anyone in authority arrived, particularly in their area where the road is far from straight, two-laned, and often has livestock wandering around. They say that it’s just too desolate to do any good without men on the ground, and then you have the water/rancher/cattle factor to deal with also.

They tell me that at night you can see lights back and forth all night and that while they feel fairly safe during the day, only seeing a few people with bags ready to swim across when they’re down on the riverfront also swimming, that it’s dangerous to be there alone. My friend’s mother recently stated that she wanted to get away, go down there and camp on her own, and they told her absolutely not, no way, even though she’s the best shot they know. There are too many drug runners mixed in with illegal wannabes, and even though there’s the INS station less than 30 miles away in Presidio, that they very seldom see anyone on patrol and we’re only talking here about a very, very small portion of the TEXAS border.

So what’s the solution? To fence or not to fence? Armed guards? It’s a tough one, but I agree, something MUST be done. I think my piranha idea is sounding better all the time.


This has been a production of the Guard the Borders Blogburst. It was started by Euphoric Reality, and serves to keep immigration issues in the forefront of our minds as we’re going about our daily lives and continuing to fight the war on terror. If you are concerned with the trend of illegal immigration facing our country, join our Blogburst! Just send an email with your blog name and url to admin at guardtheborders dot com.

*sigh* I am such a sucker…

While Lovely Daughter was visiting, Saturday, a kitten wandered up, begging for attention. *sigh* She gave it plenty. We got up Sunday morning, and it was still hanging on our front porch, trying to get in every time we went in or out, doing everything in its power to be stepped on.

Please don’t tell anyone, but I finally fed it. Yeh. Right. Like we need another cat. *sigh* Looking for a good home for it today. Heck, any home but ours will do.

Cos it was still there this a.m.

And I fed it again.

Sucker.

My “fav” SPAM/Open Post

This is an open trackbacks post. Link to this post and then track back. If you want to host your own linkfests, check out the Open Trackbacks Alliance.

Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at Linkfest Haven.

Linkfest Haven


The amount of SPAM I recieve varies a great deal from day to day and from one venue to another. My oldest active email address collects about 1,000 SPAM emails a day in its junk folder. I never bother to screen it. I do screen the SPAM I recieve in my blog comments filters. That can range–depending upon the day, weather, sunspots and demonic activity, from several hiundred a day to well over (on peak days) a thousand.

I do try to screen it all, in hopes of catching the two or three genuine comments caught amongst the dross.

SPAM, though massively packed with electronic cholesterol, can sometimes provide a sort of toxic amusement. Continue reading “My “fav” SPAM/Open Post”