It’s NOT “just like riding a bicycle”
Ya know, I tried riding a unicycle once, but I never could really get a handle on it.

"In a democracy (‘rule by mob’), those who refuse to learn from history will be the majority and will dictate that everyone else suffer for their ignorance."
It’s NOT “just like riding a bicycle”
Ya know, I tried riding a unicycle once, but I never could really get a handle on it.
I’ve been riffing off Christine‘s scones recipes (just go to Morning Coffe and Afternoon Tea and enter a search for scones in her search box–she has several scones recipes) and have a variation on a simple scones recipe that was a big hit with my Wonder Woman.
So, here ’tis:
Ingredients
Procedure
Heat oven to 375F
Optional: also heat well-seasoned cast iron skillet to medium heat
In about 10 minutes, they’re ready to pull from the oven, butter and disappear down appreciative gullets. The lemon zest isn’t overpowering, and the lemon juice souring the milk adds just a little lightness (acidic reaction with the baking powder) to the finished prooduct. The sugar assures that, eaten without jams or jellies, they’re a lightly sweet treat.
Of course, without the amendments (the lemon zest and poppy seeds—I’d still keep the lemon juice or use vinegar to sour the milk), these are just plain ole scones that can take any number of additions. My next experiment will likely be to out the butter/margarine for applesauce and add cinnamon, a pinch of freshly-ground nutmeg, a wee tad of (freshly-ground) cloves and some raisins. I’m betting that’ll be a hit, too.
Hegel was a jackass.
Consider: any time there is a conflict between Good and Evil and the two reach a “compromise” (a synthesis of the two), Evil wins.
In any argument, when one side is right, marshalls all its facts, makes a sound argument… and compromises with the side that is wrong, marshalls NO facts (unless lies count as facts) and makes spurious arguments grounded only in its own fantsies and feelings, and yet the side that’s right compromises for expediency’s sake (or just to back off and “make peace”) then wrong has won again.
So it is in public policy, in childrearing, in education—darned near every aspect of life: there are truths and lies, rights and wrongs, and when what is true and right compromises with what is lies, wrongs, then the liars win.
Even if it’s only a drop of feces in a glass of milk, the milk’s still unfit to drink.
Hegel was a jackass.
And those who surrender principles, who will feast with the Devil himself if he’d just be civil… become Republican’t Congresscritters. (Yeh, guess what population makes up the Demoncrappic Congresscritters. The inquiry is its own answer. *sigh*)
“American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward to perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt hath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It tends to risk nothing serious for the sake of truth.”– R. L. Dabney
Carnival of the Recipes #64 is up over at Pajama Pundits, and it looks like soup recipes dominate this week.
Well, my new experimental soup/stew this week may make it into next week’s canival (I think maybe the parsnips are out), but you’ll find plenty to keep you warm as Fall hits in this week’s carnival. Meanwhile, I’m still tinkering with a chai latte drink. I’ve managed to down a gallon or so of experimental efforts this week, and pretty much liked them all.
By that, I mean, time for me to break something… Arrrgggghhhh!
Once again, something in Blogger is corrupting my posts. (It’s the devil, I just know it must be. heh) I’ve checked on three computers, each with three different browsers and it’s the same: suddenly, all my posts (except “Snarking… ” below) are all italicized.
I’ve checked the html on several of them, and it’s not i n the posts. I guess I need to check and see how badly corrupted my template is… hpefully just a coupla pieces of code… slog through the template ma while, yeh, that’s the ticket. Now, which part of my trifocals do I wanna try this time… squint and pray, squint and pray… and throw things, too, of course. *sigh*
Oh, great. Decided, “Well Blogger folks are biased toward Firefox for some unfathomable reason, so I’ll try checking stuff using it as my interface. Hmmm, while I’m here, let’s check out that “compose” tab. haven’t looked at that way of submitting posts in a coon’s age. What?!?!? The $%*&%#@ thing’s inoperable even using Firefox?!?!?”
Yeh. I know. Grow up and get a real set of blogging tools. Well, time’s come to beat Blogger into submission again…
Arrrgggghhhh! Just bear with me a while. Line by line through template and posts’ code to find the culprit. Go ahead and read some of the other posts below. Culture comments, “imported” snark, fun with telemarketers, politics and food–it’s all there, somewhere. Have fun. Heck, poke fun at my slow sifting through whatever problem it is that magically appeared bwtween one post and the next with the Blogger stuff. I can handle your snarky comments. 🙂
Yeh, yeh, and for those of y’all who’ve offered me accounts with “real” blogging software, just keep in mind: I love banging my head on a brick wall cos it feels soooo good when I stop.
OK, another hint: the italicizing is ONLY on my front page… When I open the posts individually, all is as it should be (apart from typos and the occasional obscurantist sentence structure and misspelled word :-). Strange, that.
Well, enough of that. Big day Saturday moving Lovely Daughter into her new digs, puttering around the house afterwards, hopefully getting those weekend posts I’ve been mulling over done, waiting for lightning to strike so I can have the arcane voodoo Blogger’s concealing from me revealed… etc.
Well-written snark is such a blessing…
I ran across the following (two statements separated by a couple of paragraphs and here conjoined) in an article by Douglas Wilson (who is even better, if that seems possible, at construction of great snark than Prince Lileks):
“…and postmodern hoohah, the last of which could be refuted by three toddlers with kazoos …Leotard defined postmodernism as ‘incredulity toward all metanarratives.’ Of course, this is a metanarrative itself, smirking away as though we wouldn’t notice, and so all we need to do is summon the toddlers and their kazoos.”
As always, Credenda‘s just fulla the stuff.
Tired of telemarketers trying to work their way around “no call†lists?
Yeh, well, so am I. And as far as I’m concerned, this is a Civil Liberties issue: I feel perfect at liberty to do everything within my power to spike these scammers, liars and cheats (Oh! My!) any old way I can.
Recently, we’ve gotten several calls from a Caller ID-blocked number, an obvious machine-generated voice message, “informing†us that the call “is not a telemarketing call†and “the head of household needs†to call a certain number.
Riiiiight.
Soooo, from a Caller ID blocked phone of my own, I called the number and discovered that it was a company trying to sell debt consolidation.
I tried to warn ‘em… really, I tried.
After a few calls attempting to escalate things to some manager to warn I gave up and called our State Attorney General’s office. Now, ya have to understand, this guy made his bones taking down telemarketers. It’s his main claim to fame. The consumer complaint rep I talked to promised fast action (and from the office’s record, that’s one of the few government bureaucratic pledges I give a little weight) and thanked me for reporting the scam.
Then… heh, then I called the scammers back. Told the person that answered the phone that I had gotten a call telling me to call that number. (True) She asked me what the number where I received the call was (caller ID blocking on the phone I was using).
I gave her our State Attorney General’s consumer complaint number. (OK, a small, wee, teen-eintsy fib)
*click-click-clickety-click* “Oh… “ CLICK, BUZZZZZZ
“Wha-fo’ the dialtone, Boopsy?†thought I.
Heh
“Submitted†at Cao’s Friday Open Trackback Party, Adam’s Blog’s Open Trackbacks, Stop the ACLU’s Open Trackback Weekend and Open Trackbacks at Big Dog’s Weblog.
Oxymoron of the day: Corporate Creativity. A mini-rant
First we have this: Grandfather sued for $600,000 for 12-year-okd grandson’s downloads. Yep. The kid downloaded copies of DVDs he already owned and the MPAA is suing his grandfather for owning the computer they were downloaded to, then deleted from.
Kinda makes ya wanna go right out and watch another crappy movie made by Hollyweird, doesn’t it?
Then there’s this: Sony institutes crippling anti-use software on CDs. But here’s the kicker: it’s done so on the recordings of at least one group that it does not “own†(just distributes their independently-produced stuff), a group that has said it does not want the crippling “featureâ€.
Yeh, that’ll encourage sales (and artist creativity thereby, all right. Make it darned near impossible (or damnably difficult) to use a legally purchased CD for legally-allowed uses. Consumers’ll love that!
But this loon takes the cake: 1st Story Line Patent Published. Words fail me. (But that’s probably a good thing, cos someone, somewhere is probably going to patent the thought processes I’d use to comment and then I’d end up being sued outa house and home… oops! There I go… )
Come the revolution (heh, riiiiight), lawyers first in line for the guillotine, followed by the RIAA, MPAA, and all their partners in crime like Fritz Holling (the wholly-owned Senator from Disney) and his ilk.
While our Congresscritters fiddle, Islamic savages are burning whatever is handy. Ya think it won’t happen here if our government’s “Homeland Security” keystone kops routine isn’t amended? Well, maybe… just not likely in America’s Third World Countyâ„¢
In a convergence of thoughtful pieces, Committees of Correspondence’s Dan Kaufman posts “Lest we forget“* reminding us that November 2 also marks the anniversary of Theo van Gogh’s brutal murder at the hands of an Islamic savage, while Big Lizards’ Dafydd ab Hugh notes the emminent collapse of Old Europe in the face of Islamic savages with “Arms For the Poor“.
Dafydd ab Hugh (I just love typing that Welsh name 🙂 does note a potential way for European leaders to enable their peoples to withstand the armed Islamic barbarians in their midst, but I hardly see the elite of Old Europe’s political rulers vigorously encouraging something like our Second Amendment rights… heh


Among the eye-opening revelations of “Do As I Say”:
The hypocrisy doesn’t end there. Pelosi has received more money from the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees union than any other member of Congress in recent election cycles.
But the Pelosis own a large stake in an exclusive hotel in Rutherford, Calif. It has more than 250 employees. But none of them are in a union, according to Schweizer, author of “The Bushes: Portrait of a Dynasty” and a regular contributor to the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and other periodicals.
The Pelosis are also partners in a restaurant chain called Piatti, which has 900 employees. The chain is – that’s right, a non-union shop.
But Chomsky has been paid millions of dollars by the Pentagon over the last 40 years, and he used a venerable law firm to set up his irrevocable trust to shield his assets from the IRS.
One Kennedy family trust wasn’t even set up in the U.S., but in Fiji.
Another family member, environmentalist Robert Kennedy Jr., has said that it is not moral to profit from natural resources. But he receives an annual check from the family’s large holdings in the oil industry.
Hillary, for her part, has written and spoken extensively about the right of children to make major decisions regarding their own lives. But she barred 13-year-old daughter Chelsea from getting her ears pierced and forbid the teen from watching MTV or HBO.
Schweizer writes: “Liberals claim to support affirmative action but don’t practice it. They support higher taxes but set up complicated tax shelters to avoid paying them. They claim to be ardent environmentalists but abandon their cause when it impinges on their own property rights.
“The reality is that liberals like to preach in moral platitudes. They like to condemn ordinary Americans and Republicans for a whole host of things – racism, lack of concern for the poor, polluting the environment, and greed.
“But when it comes to applying those same standards to themselves, liberals are found to be shockingly guilty of hypocrisy.
“The media and the American people need to hold them accountable.”
…and this:
