Big Brother’s Sister’s Keywords

Well, Janet Napolitano’s Goon Squad has assembled a list of keywords that will flag your Internet activity for government spying. First Amendment? Notsomuch anymore. It’s 1984, just a wee tad behind time. (Well, we’ve already had Newspeak for quite some time from “feddle gummint bureacraps”, politicians *gag-spew* and the Mass MEdia Podpeople Hivemind; now we get thugs spying on our exercise of a fundamental right.)


Is anyone surprised by this? If so, I have a question for ya: Been living under a rock in Outer Mongolia?

The Single Best Way to Honor Military Heroes

Both the dead whom we honor today and the living. The best way, far better than a day of flags and barbecues and parades and watching sports, a “holiday” merchandizing opportunity and other such activities: always spend your vote in the cause of liberty. Work to advance candidates who are committed to protecting REAL human rights (not the phony “rights” so loudly shouted by the left nowadays) and REAL, responsible liberty (not the licentiousness and freedom to steal from others promoted by the left nowadays).

Exercise your citizenship for the good of your grandchildren and great grandchildren and generations yet undreamed of, instead of simply for the short term benefit of self-annointed “elites” and the Balkanized special interest groups they milk for power. Then, live your life as a FREE citizen, unshackled from the tyranny of the State while upholding your genuine duties as a citizen.

THAT’S the best way to honor those who have died to purchase your liberties and protect your human rights.


“other such activities”: There’s nothing wrong with flying flags, parades and barbecues and buying and selling stuff and suchlike. In fact, all those things can be outgrowths of free citizens simply living their lives as they see fit, without imposing themselves on others. But those things aren’t in and of themselves worthy expressions of honoring those who have given their lives to defend our liberties, our rights.

Phony “rights”: see this article at LewRockwell.Com for a starting place. It’s a list of the fake “rights” Franklin Roosevelt promoted that have been expanded into the current litany of the left.

“genuine duties”: defend your own rights and honor the rights of others (“Your rights end where my nose begins” and vice versa), and require government to do the same and no more. What are some of those legitimate rights we have a duty to defend and to require our government to defend? A good place to start:

Life
Liberty
The pursuit of happiness

But when one considers a “pursuit of happiness” as denoted by the Declaration of Independence one really ought to ask what that phrase meant to those who signed their names affirming that right. That’s an easy task, since the discussions of that document are themselves well-documented. The “happiness” considered a right to pursue included, but was not limited to another word that was considered for inclusion: property. The right to own and control the use of one’s own private property was included in the Founders’ thinking in “happiness”. Don’t take my word for it. Do your own homework.

Then, among other rights “reserved to the people”, we have some denoted by the Bill of Rights such as the right to free exercise of religion, the right to criticize the government, in speech and print, seeking a redress of grievances, the right of self-defense (and self-defense against government tyranny at that), the right to tell government trolls to f* off at one’s door, if they lack a duly executed search or arrest warrant, etc.

Defense of these liberties and basic human rights is ultimately the responsibility of citizens under our formal polity. REQUIRING of our governments (local, state, federal) that they uphold these rights and enforce these liberties against the outlaws (including those “feddle gummint bureaucraps” and “law enfArcement ossifers” and politicians *gag-spew* who manufacture tyrannical laws and regulations that subvert the law of the land purely for their own benefit) is a major part of our duties as citizens, and absent honest attempts to fulfill these duties, any “honor” we pay those who died in defense of these rights and liberties is hypocritical at best.

Just sayin’. Of course, Moina Michaels said it better back not long after WWI:

We Shall Keep the Faith

by Moina Michael, November 1918

Oh! you who sleep in Flanders Fields,
Sleep sweet – to rise anew!
We caught the torch you threw
And holding high, we keep the Faith
With All who died.

We cherish, too, the poppy red
That grows on fields where valor led;
It seems to signal to the skies
That blood of heroes never dies,
But lends a lustre to the red
Of the flower that blooms above the dead
In Flanders Fields.

And now the Torch and Poppy Red
We wear in honor of our dead.
Fear not that ye have died for naught;
We’ll teach the lesson that ye wrought
In Flanders Fields.

I’ll not explain the “Flanders Fields” reference. If you’re not already well familiar with the John McCrae poem, then shame on you.

Tightwaddery: Simply Clear Thinking

A few years ago, our central air conditioning unit began showing signs of eventual–more like near term–failure. Of course, we looked into replacement; who wants to live through sweltering summers? And then, after several years of annual “resurrection calls” to AC service folk of varying ability, it failed.

We chose to swelter through that Summer. (OK, we added fans. *meh* Was not all that bad.)

But what did we ultimately do? Well, we had several options:

    Continue to suffer through the humidity of late Spring and the heat and humidity of Summer.

    Try to ameliorate the situation by installing a whole house fan–an option that appealed to me but wasn’t a solid sell.

    Install a new central AC unit.

Or…

    Zone the house and use “point cooling”.

Sure, a new unit would probably have worked and been more efficient than our old one by far, but what we ended up with

    Cost much less than 1/10 of replacing (and upgrading, of course, including the air handler that would’ve had to be replaced inside, etc.) the central AC unit

    Uses much less electricity than the old central AC unit, and not much more than when we went a Summer with just fans!

    Allows us to effect additional savings when we want by simply turning off cooling for areas we aren’t using.

Of course, we went with the least expensive method of zoning the house: window units. Yeh, yeh, I’m sure that impacts the salability of the house, but since that’ll really only affect our heirs, we just DGARA. We own the place (no mortgage) and have no intention of ever moving, so why should we care? (If they want,the kids can install central AC when we’re gone and they need to sell the house. We won’t care.)

Disadvantages: minimal.

Advantages: overwhelming.

Thinking inside the box and looking away from stale, boring, “standard” solutions can make one’s lifestyle more affordably comfortable.


Oh, one cool plus: freed up the 60-AMP 240-Volt circuit the central AC had run on to be split into 2 30-AMP 120-Volt circuits. Sweet!

“First Amendment? What F*n First Amendment?”

Typical of recent libtards, Barbara Streisand and other libtards have apparently provided substantial financial support to convicted serial bomber, legal system abuser and perjurer, Brett Kimberlin.

If you’ve not been living under a rock on the Moon, you probably already have some awareness of how this apparently soulless creep has been harassing people who simply mention his publicly available record. If you have been living under a rock on the Moon and as a result your Internet connection just hasn’t been working too well, a simple search will turn up all you need to know about this turd.

Bureaucraps Cost More Than They’re Worth

Really. Take just one data point:

Each year, the United States spends $65,000 per poor family to “fight poverty” – in a country in which the average family income is just under $50,000. Meanwhile, most of that money goes to middle-class and upper-middle-class families, and the current U.S. poverty rate is higher than it was before the government began spending trillions of dollars on anti-poverty programs.

Now, I’m all for extending a helping hand to folks in genuine need. I’ve done it myself, as a personal choice. I’ve worked in food banks, homeless shelters and more. But who is the “feddle gummint” really “helping” with its disingenuously-named “war on poverty”? As far as I can see, it’s mostly a full employment program for federal and state bureaucraps, with the rest going to a mix of lazy bums and a few truly needy.

Apart from the very few who really are poor who are the “poor” in America? According to the “feddle gummint’s” own data, they’re part of the figurative “1%”–viewed as against the rest of the world.

According to the government’s own survey data, in 2005, the average household defined as poor by the government lived in a house or apartment equipped with air conditioning and cable TV. The family had a car (a third of the poor have two or more cars). For entertainment, the household had two color televisions, a DVD player, and a VCR.

If there were children in the home (especially boys), the family had a game system, such as an Xbox or PlayStation. In the kitchen, the household had a microwave, refrigerator, and an oven and stove. Other household conveniences included a washer and dryer, ceiling fans, a cordless phone, and a coffee maker.

The home of the average poor family was in good repair and not overcrowded. In fact, the typical poor American had more living space than the average European. (Note: That’s average European, not poor European.) The average poor family was able to obtain medical care when needed. When asked, most poor families stated they had had sufficient funds during the past year to meet all essential needs.

By its own report, the family was not hungry. The average intake of protein, vitamins, and minerals by poor children is indistinguishable from children in the upper middle class and, in most cases, is well above recommended norms. Poor boys today at ages 18 and 19 are actually taller and heavier than middle-class boys of similar age in the late 1950s and are a full one inch taller and 10 pounds heavier than American soldiers who fought in World War II. The major dietary problem facing poor Americans is eating too much, not too little; the majority of poor adults, like most Americans, are overweight.

Consider:

We Americans, on average, have it pretty good in the worldly goods category. But what about “poor” Americans? How do they fare n the worldly goods scale?

Right. Notalotadifference, eh? And that doesn’t even take into account the often–usually–transitional nature of the so-called “poverty” as designated by the “feddle gummint”.

Do note that I know full well that there are folks who are genuinely struggling to meets family needs for food, clothing and shelter, but those folks are vanishingly few compared to the numbers of folks who are really just sucking at the government teat… and assuring paychecks for “gummint bureaucraps” (I refuse to say most government bureaucraps are really doing jobs, although there are some worth having around I’m sure).

Just sayin’.

Why I May Never Die

If W. H. Auden’s pithy observation holds water, I just might live forever:

As poets have mournfully sung,
Death takes the innocent young,
The rolling in money,
The screamingly funny
And those who are very well hung.

Well, at least there may be an up side to being me…