"In a democracy (‘rule by mob’), those who refuse to learn from history will be the majority and will dictate that everyone else suffer for their ignorance."
So, my inbox had an email with the breathless title, “Horowitz: Are Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers working in the Obama Administration?” and the following graphic:
Methinks these guys give The Muslim Brotherhood too much credit. “Infiltrated”? Nah, more like “recruited”. After all, the Muslim Brotherhood Fellow Traveler-in-Chief occupies the Oval Office.
…that “Choom” Obama-Soetoro seems rather… dim? “57 states (so far)” “Austrian language” “corpse man” and on and on and on: examples of why maybe Cwazy Unka Joe seems to him to be a fitting running mate? Could “Choom” Obama-Soetoro’s obvious dimness be related to his doper habits as an adolescent?
“Cannabis smoking ‘permanently lowers IQ'”
“Researchers found persistent users of the drug [marijuana], who started smoking it at school, had lower IQ scores as adults.
“They were also significantly more likely to have attention and memory problems in later life, than their peers who abstained.
“Furthermore, those who started as teenagers and used it heavily, but quit as adults, did not regain their full mental powers, found academics at King’s College London and Duke University in the US.”
I’ve had problems for several years–well, since 2007, at least–understanding or believing the assertions of The Zero’s brilliance, because of the observable evidence of his words and deeds. Frankly, apologies in advance to those I’m about to insult, I’ve met smarter parrots. (See? There I go insulting parrots *sigh* When will I ever learn?)
I don’t doubt some leftard (or other lying scum) would call me a racist for noticing the process The Zero and his co-conspirators, fellow travelers and devoted worshipers are engaged in, but who gives a rat’s patootie what such lying scum think, anyway? After all, they seem to call anyone who acknowledges reality (as opposed to embracing their “reality-based” fantasies) a racist nowadays. “Haterz” one and all.” *heh*
Given The Zero’s record to date and his plain statements revealing his personal philosophy and intent, it’s manifest that he and his ilk are intent on cannibalizing the US economy to feed the “feddle gummint” beast. In doing so, they’re using all the sharply-honed, advanced tactics of Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals and the Cloward-Pivin Strategy.
But one has to wonder if a cannibal using knives and forks and observing proper table manners is really an improvement over the cannibal in his natural state: nasty, brutish and short.
Continue reading “No Doubt Some Would Call Me a “Racist” for This”
…with this pic
…is that at least some identifier of the “masked man (?)” behind what is apparently the TOTUS should be included. Like this:
Or, at least The Zero would if he could count to five without taking his shoes off.
Check out The Zero’s face in this video. “WTF?!? What’s he talkin’ ’bout, Willis? Is that MATH?!?” If you’ve ever wondered what Odumbo’s face looks like when confronted with numbers, well, here ya go:
http://youtu.be/o1yTY2MciOk
Oh, and during all the demonizing of Ryan and his budgetary proposals, do remember that they guy who was THE ZERO’S PICK to head up his “deficit committee” and represent the administration’s policies, Erskine Bowles (Clinton SBA head, later WH chief of staff), über-Democrat, had a different view:
Just sayin’. Serious policy wonks don’t share the views of Mass MEdia Podpeople like Rachel Maddow and Michael Moore. *sigh* The only real negative I can see in having Ryan as a vice presidential candidate is that he’ll be wasted “debating” Cwazy Unka Joe (if The Zero’s campaign even lets that massacre happen). At the top of the ticket, he’d have a chance to obliterate The Zero, metaphorically nuking him from orbit.
Oh, fun. Jerry Pournelle suggests (in my words, not his) that with the Romney/Ryan strengths on economic policy against The Zero’s (and zero-cubed, Cwazy Unka Joe) profound weaknesses, some Dhimmicraps might be tempted to play the “no foreign policy experience” card… and that that would be a real tarbaby for the Dhims, as
“…anyone including Elmer Fudd has more experience in foreign affairs than the current President had on taking office.”
Bazinga!
By now, anyone with more conscious brain activity than a bowl of coleslaw has heard about the scurrilous ad from an Obama-promoting PAC essentially accusing Mitt Romney of being a murderer.
It’s a pack of lies, built by selectively stating a few highly slanted facts… and omitting any truth. And those who presented the ad KNEW they were crafting a slander.
“[They] did enough research to find Mr. Joe Soptic. They did enough research to craft an ad from the man’s sad story. They did enough research to know that Mrs. Soptic died seven years after Romney left Bain, they know that Bain tried to save GST, and they know that an Obama [campaign finance] bundler was the person who ultimately shut GST down. They did the research, they brought the ad forward, and they know more than any of the fact-checkers know, that the ad is a lie.”
They AND the official Obama campaign that introduced Soptic to them also know now AND knew then that Soptic was offered a buy-out, got another job, didn’t put his wife on his insurance–even after she left her job in 2003–and that no insurance under the sun could have saved his wife’s life, since she was symptom-free, was diagnosed during an unrelated illness and passed away 22 days after diagnosis.
And the Obama campaign knew all this back in May, when Stephanie Cutter, deputy Obama campaign manager, hosted a conference call with reporters featuring Soptic and his now infamous story. And yet, of course, the Obama campaign–including Stephanie Cutter, from her own mouth–denied knowing Soptic’s story when the SHTF about the lies in the ad and denied as well any connection to Soptic or the story told in the ad.
Lying about their lies. Oh, well. I guess it’s common enough in this administration to be just another “dog bites man” ho-hummer of a story.
[Roofing work takes a brief blog break 🙂 ]
So, Odumbo, The Mighty Zero is now claiming, “I didn’t say that!”
Yes, Odumbo, you did, and, quite apart from all the YouTube hits on the video that proves you did, even your own White House web site says you did:
Mostest brilliant prexydint evah. And his little dog (“Soup”) too.
The Zero, addressing successful businesses (seeking to establish that they need to be taxed even more) has said, in part,
“Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that.”
WTF?!? Business owners aren’t taxed out the wazoo (America’s business taxes are the highest among industrialized nations) first with taxes on their businesses and then on their personal income (“Top 20% pay 94% of income taxes. Bottom 40%? Nada, zilch, zippo”) to pay not only for infrastructure but for “a multitude of New Offices… swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance”?
You do realize that, just in order to make any profit at all in the face of the horrendous expenses imposed by almost endless paperwork and other “compliance” costs businesses are compelled by just the “feddle gummint” alone to incur that businesses must pass on the tax expenses (at the very least) the government imposes, AND that the supply chain hidden taxes are about 22% of every product and service you purchase? What Odumbo is really saying is that because he wants to expand the number of people dependent on government, he wants to TAX YOU MORE.
BTW, as it stands right now, there are only about 1.2 workers for every person either on welfare or in government “employment”. Yes, yes I know some government workers really do exist, workers performing essential tasks. My own back of the envelope guesstimate would place them at about 1/5 of the total of government employees, based on what I’ve observed over the past half century or so. The rest? Just a covert “welfare” program for useless drones or toxic, “Type 2 Bureaucraps”.
As for Odumbo, well, he either knows he’s lying or he’s an idiot. (The two, I realize aren’t really mutually exclusive, and, in fact, in Odumbo’s case, aren’t at all.)
[N.B. Sticky post; newer posts below]
Was an expression of hope for change, unanswered.
