“Love Your Enemy”/OTA Wednesday

Yep, OTA Wednesday. See the foot of the post for info on linking to this post and tracking back.

I have had one person honestly question my taunting and ridiculing of Muslims and Islam based on Matthew 5:44-45,

“Love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those you hate you, and pray for those who despitefully use you, and persecute you that you may be the children of your Father who is in heaven.”

Fine. I’ll take up that gauntlet, thrown by a genuine questioner…

One segment of Islam/Muslim apologists/terrorist enablers I ridicule regularly are those who proclaim Islam a religion of peace, one that values women and has (according to them) exemplary teachings on human rights. Should I ridicule and taunt these liars? Let’s consider what Jesus said to people of MORE upright character than the damned (a theological assessment) liars who falsely proclaim the goodness of Islam:

“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitened tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but inwardly are full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.”

And,

“You are of your father, the devil [liar, traducer, false witness], and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and doesn’t stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks on his own; for he is a liar, and its father.”

(Gee, Jesus’ description of the devil and his progeny sounds like Mohammed was patterning his life EXACTLY on that description. For example, he lied to the Jews of Medina in order to be able later to kill all the men and rape and enslave all the women and children, either himself or by proxy through his immediate disciples… EXACTLY as is done today by those who carefully and honestly follow the example of the Butcher of Medina.)

Or, how about the heritage upon which Jesus built his teachings?

Isaiah 5:20:

“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”

Calling evil by its name is not politically correct nowadays, and the prissy neo-victorian bowdlerization of language found in most Christian circles thinks calling evil, well, evil is somehow rude or “unloving” (whatever that means in the squishy speech of prissy neo-victorianism).

I ask you this: with so many people making excuses for Muslims to continue to be savage, brutal, murdering animals—including so-called, disingenuous “moderate Muslim” terrorist enablers—how unloving is it to confront Muslims with the reality that their cult is based upon the life and work of a man who was a proven liar, murderer, thief, child molester, mutilator and slaver? Someone who couldn’t even keep his lies straight? Is such confrontation unloving?

Nope. Someone has to care enough to bash ’em on the head with a cluebat. Personally, I would not mind in the least—and would think it productive in fact—to seriously consider openly, loudly and honestly, taking exteme measures to marginalize Islam and Muslim-dominated countries, if not forever at least for the next millennium. We can eliminate this country’s dependence on foreign oil, as but one example, and thus take money out of the mouths of poor, starving terrorists.

But, yeh, I pray for the idiots (and the truly, deliberately, wittingly evil) who are true believers in Islam—both the honest ones out there trying to blow up schoolchildren and the lying sons of bitches who say the terrorists are perverting the message of the Butcher of Medina. And yes, I am trying to “do good” to them by regularly telling them the truth: that they are brutal savages following a lying, brutal, savage, evil son of satan.

If the truth pricks them, then maybe ONE will accept the fact that once they admit the truth that Mohammed was a(n evil, butchering, savage rapist, lying, murderous, treacherous, pedophiliac) con man, they have no Islam to fall back on.

Of course, the chances of that happening when rejecting their lying “prophet” and his moon-god can result in being sentenced to death in their barbaric societies is slim. How ironic is it that the Butcher of Medina—who set the precedent of murdering others who reject his lies—is quoted in the Quran as saying his moon-god told him coerced “belief” was wrong… [Surah 88:21-22]. Mohammed himself apparently broke with his own moon-god over coercion, as his life was an example of killing those who disagreed with him, time after time after time.

Attempting time after time to pound through the thick skulls of lying Musslemen to slip in one single iota of truth, can be a tad frustrating. It reminds me of two things. One, trying to get a Muslim to admit the truth about themselves and their cult of barbaric atrocities is akin to attempting to teach a pig to sing. It can be frustrating as all getout for you and only annoys the pig. The other thing it reminds me of is this song:

TimeAfterTimeAfterTime.mp3

Yep. Most times, it’ll be an exercise in futility, if experience to date is any guide, cos every genuine Muslim I’ve met to date has been either too stupid or too dishonest (or both) to admit the truth, even when it’s in their own best interest to do so.

This is an Open Post. Link to this post and track back.

Also note the other fine blogs featuring linkfests at

Linkfest Haven.