Sad State of Education 0106-2

Here’s an update/addendum via Hugh:

College grads’ literacy shows ‘appalling’ drop
Test finds many cannot interpret tables, food labels

While more Americans are graduating from college, and more than ever are applying for admission, far fewer are leaving higher education with the skills needed to comprehend routine data, such as reading a table about the relationship between blood pressure and physical activity, according to the federal study conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics.

I have a pdf of an article (well, book excerpt) that expands on this theme. I need to review that and see about posting it, too, I imagine.

But seriously, is this any surprise? Anyone who has been a voracious reader for 30, 40 or 50 years can certainly tell after a brief conversation or exchange of e-s or a few comments on a blogpost that recent crops of college grads (and from my experience, it doesn’t much matter where they graduated from) are extremely poorly read, and indeed largely lack certain qualities that widely-read people seem to almost universally possess. Among those possessions are a cultural liteeracy that transcends the pablum available through popular media; a sparpened ability to think logically; and a written vocabulary that reflects a.) an actual understanding of the meanings of words rthey use and b.) orthography that demonstrates they have read, not just heard the words they are using.

This morning My Favorite Librarian related to me some tragi-comic typos, word misuses and serious syntactical problems creating amphibolous meanings of whole passages… in a book about research into ways to improve reading.

heh

Might I suggest one way would be to write books that spelled words correctly, used words properly and had good, logical syntax? Oh. That was the theme of one of the SECTIONS of this book!

When subliterates are writing books on how to improve reading skills, then we are all in for a bumpy ride…

{EDIT/ADDENDUM} From Pournelle, again:

…one wonders if the champions of political correctness don’t send their kids to private schools or teach them to read at an early age themselves, so that by ruining the public schools they can keep the lower classes who can’t afford private schools in their places? If the system were designed to solidify class boundaries, ruining the public schools by preventing the teaching of reading would be the first step to take. Since this is the result produced, I wonder again if it is not intended. How can so many educated people be so stupid? How can they ignore all evidence that their imbecile meddling is producing disasters?

Are those in charge of education fools, or are they evil? Those are the only alternatives I come up with. Political correctness is not a game with inconsequential implications, it is a monstrous system for keeping the minorities down, solidifying class lines, and generally seeing that the worst stay on top.

Ditching a trip to the principal’s office for the Tuesday Specials at Jo’s Cafe

The Crux

I know no one who has not done stupid things or behaved dishonestly at some point or another in their lives. And I specifically include myself in that assessment. Only a pathological liar could live past the age of two and say that they’ve never done something stupid or dishonest with a straight face.

That said, what’s the difference between a common, ordinary decent person and the typical Mass Media Podperson, politician *spit*, Academia Nut or Loony Left Moonbat?

It’s this: an ordinarily decent person experiences genuine guilt when they catch themselves lying or decieving others and will repent and attempt to remediate their lie. An ordinarily decent person who does something stupid will make every effort to make whole anyone harmed by their stupidity and seek for ways to do better next time.

John F. Kerry, whose name really should be pronounced “Jean Fraud sKerry”, is the early 21st century poster boy for pathological liars and wilfull stupidity. From his first entry into public life, he has lived by lying and by slandering others. It’s his fundamental personality trait. It doesn’t matter to him or to anyone who supports him that his lies are largely a matter of public record, that they have been exposed as lies time after time after time, because he 9and his supporters) care not one whit for truth in any form.

And so, his blatant stupidities get a pass as well. He can contradict himself from one day to another, from one part of a speech or interview to another, from one part of a sentence to another, and to him snd his devotees, his stupidity is a sign of intellect.

Another lie.

So, where are the records Jean Fraud sKerry has promised time and again to make public? Nowhere, mon frere. But that’s perfectly sensible when one realizes that an “echo test”* performed on Jean Fraud would return a null value.

No More sKerry BS_button

Jean Fraud: no more B.S. Where’s the beef?

Sneered forth at The Liberal Wrong Wing and at Cao’s Blog, where the Free Kerry’s 180 all started (go there and sign up, eh?)

*The “echo test” was devised by the late, great Werner von Sam Browne as a field test for the presence (or absence) of gray matter between the ears of doofs, politicians and moonbats. Simply have the subject open its mouth, rap it sharply on the noggin a few times. No sound comes out the mouth (beyond the occasional “Ouch!” or the like)? Well, you know, sound doesn’t travel in a vaccuum…

The Sad State of Education

[Although this was posted Monday night, consider this Tuesday’s 0PEN P0ST. Link and teebee away, folks. Questions? Ask ’em in comments.]

No, the “Sad State” is not a locale. *sigh* And it’s not limited to the United States, from what aquaintances in Australia, Britain, Canada, France and elsewhere tell me. It seems the West as a rule is intent on committing suicide and educational malpractice is just one of the chosen means. But this post only deals with a few limited aspects of the problem in the U.S.

This recent (one of many, many such) discussion at Chaos Manor touches briefly on just one aspect of the deplorable state of education in the U.S. While I think Dr. Pournelle’s probably correct on the fundamental issue of reading comprehension (which evidence indicates has declined even further from the deplorable state reflected in the 1992 NALS), the problem of reading comprehension is much more complex than simply poor decoding, as I am sure he’d agree.

Nevertheless, the fact that so very many high school and college grads are such poor functional readers, needing to actually struggle to decode the text, and thus actually read very little of consequence (why struggle with difficult concepts unless absolutely necessary when struggling with the coded text is difficult enough?) and comprehend so little, so shallowly, what they do read is extremely troubling.

(Have difficulty parsing long, complicated, convoluted sentences? Blame your teachers, in part.)

A subliterate democracy is in serious trouble. On many levels. An obvious area of concern is that of an informed electorate. If you have the stomach for it, listen to some blow-dried newspuppets for a while. Even “reading” their prepared scripts is too much for these airheads. Seldom does a newsreader notice that some other subliterate has handed them copy that contains misused words or amphibolous construction, let alone more problematic, outright lies. Why? Because their shallow education and lack of breadth and depth of reading has left most of them incapable of even knowing when they are spewing gibberish.

But no problem. Most of the people who get their information from such “sources” can’t tell, anyway.

And that’s a real problem. Combine arrogant elitism and greed with subliteracy (the typical problems of elite so-called liberals and their welfare plantation serfs) and it’s no wonder “progressive” social programs are disasters, felled by unintended (to put the best construction on it) consequences. Combine cowardice, greed and subliteracy (but three of faux “conservative” problems) and the recipe is just as disasterous.

In each case, only one of the variables is open to much amelioration via public policy, and that’s the true literacy rate.

Of course, changes there seem next to impossible, as long as the least competent to direct education are influencing what is taught and how. I mean, of course, professors of education in colleges and universities whose faddish experimentations with generations of American students have been largely instrumental in creating the cesspool that is public education today. And who could neglect to mention the politicians and educrats from Washington D.C. down to State legislatures who have made huge strides toward creating generations of stupid American sheeple?

Washington D.C. Easily the worst school system in the country. And Congress is directly responsible for administering it. Yeh. The more congresscritters can make the rest of the country like D.C….

And public school administrators. *sigh* Bless their little pea-pickin’ hearts. Or perhaps I ought to say, little pea-brained heads. Not exactly dumber than rocks, but certainly the most proximal stumbling blocks to most children’s early education. (Love the redundancy? πŸ™‚

What to do? I’m with Pournelle on several remedies.

1.) Teach them to read. No, really read. There are vanishingly few children who cannot be taught to read with greatly better proficiency than is reflected in the latest NAAL report. Oh, BTW, only folks who are both able and willing to drill down into the actual report will discover that. The website could easily mislead (well, by outright lies, in a few cases *sigh*) people into believing things have improved since 1992 with the summary statements and topic headlines. Remember: it’s a highly-politicized topic and the report is heavy on CYA.

2.) Put control of local curriculum and teaching methodology back at the local level. Period. Some schools will excell. Some will end up “excelling” only in mediocrity. Others will be abject failures. But in any case, the schools need to be completely the responsibility of the local citizens, no matter how dim-witted and uninformed they may have been made by their own educatinal experiences. There are almost always enough people who both care about there children’s education and are capable of rational thought to make locally-managed (no, really: no state or federal “mandates” funded or otherwise!) to make a go of it.

3.) (This one is not Pournelle’s formulation) Give productive work to education professors. Breaking rocks or cleaning cesspools or something. ANYTHING but letting them corrupt another generation of teachers.

It’d take some shakeout time, but in the end removing remote management by educrats and politicians and stifling dumbass “schools of education” this pseudo democratic republic just might have a chance of surviving.

Otherwise, we’d better get ready to hand the keys over to China.

(BTW, I’ve alluded to this before, but a quick restatement here might be in order. While I began my pubschool journey well before half of the Americans alive today were born, I do not consider my own education to have been untouched by the idiocies we see around us today. My own gradeschool through high school years [college and grad were private schools] were filled with pap. I was always amazed at my gransparents’ educational depth-especially after I began to be exposed in college to many of the things they learned in their high school years. Yep. Though three of my four grandparents did attend college, and two attain degrees-one advanced degrees-their personal libraries of high school texts contained significant cultural literacy that I never even had classroom exposure to in college! Or grad school… Glad am I for my grandparents’ examples of continuing education apart from formal schooling… Oh, yeh, my parents, too, I guess. heh πŸ™‚

Kept after school at Basil’s.

[Minor update for proofreaders: No, I’m NOT going to correct any more typos. I will change the batteries in my wireless keyboard, though. πŸ™‚

Belated Xmas Gifts from Hugh

Hugh, a frequent commenter and aquaintance of long standing on an e-list, sent me the following belated Christmas gifts, and I thought it only fitting I share them with y’all.

here’s your copy of the 2006 Hooters Calendar

and an entry for your enchiridion of political savvy (alternatively titled, “Being a Dumbass for Dummmies 101”).

Your eternal adulation for regifting these to you is the only thanks I deserve.

Patting myself on the back at Committees of Corrspondence. (‘S’all right: I’m still moderately flexible that way… for an old geezer who’s particularly fond of repetitive redundancy and other abominations.)

IMPORTANT PSA UPDATE: WMF Security Flaw

Yeh, only applies to ALL WINDOWS USERS!!!

Steve Gibson (developer of Spinrite) has perhaps the best material on the Windows Metafile security flaw and what to do about it NOW. Just CLICK on over and follow directions. He even posts a link to a patch (for Win2000, XP/SP2 and 2003 systems only) developed by a NON-Micro$oft software engineer that Steve recommends highly. Steve also posts a workaround for older Windows OS systems and a vulnerability test. See more info at Ilfak Guilfanov’s site.

I take Steve Gibson’s word to be extremely reliable on this issue.

Do NOT rely on your anti-virus to catch this, folks. The hooks into the OS are too deep for that to be a reliable solution. DO take this as a serious security warning.

Further update (for those who are not yet inclined to CLICK through to the links above). From the highly-respected anti-virus/security firm F-Secure, this:

1) There are probably other vulnerable functions in WMF files in addition to SetAbortProc
2) This bug seems to affect all versions of Windows, starting from Windows 3.0 – shipped in 1990!

“The WMF vulnerability” probably affects more computers than any other security vulnerability, ever.

Don’t say you weren’t warned.

PSA Pinned to Conservative Cat’s Bulletin Board with a link to Ferdy’s predictions for 2006… uhm, 2005. heh

Yeh, yeh: another one of those 0pen p0sts ;-)

OK, so here’s the deal. If you don’t know how these things work, then drop me an e- or a comment. I’ll check back later today, and there had better be a few good reads or I’ll come on over to YOUR blogs and drink up all your beer, put my feet all over the furniture and all other kinds of abominations of desolation.

πŸ˜‰

making a mess all over the place at Stuck on Stupid

Internet Exploder: ROFL

ROFL, indeed. The English Guy (Hey, man! Crosspost that thing over here where I semi-regularly offend Internet Exploder users! –Just kidding, Woody πŸ™‚ has posted: What Microsoft Employees Think of IE.

Please allow me to repeat that with a minor emphasis added:

What Microsoft Employees Think of IE

Oh, yeh. I’ve posted links before to IE problems admitted by Microsoft developers, but The English Guy’s brief post underscores things in a way those links did not.

Thanks, man. Great post.

Mixed Review

Disclaimer: I don’t generally like or in any way appreciate didacticism. Especially not in novels, but generally not anywhere. I also don’t appreciate being preached to most of the time. (Mainly because most of the “preachers”-both from secular and “sacred” realms are usually so bad at it that any valid points they may have are obscured by all the rubbish they lade on top.)

That said, imagine my ambivalence when I picked up Michael Crichton’s State of Fear. The thing’s just one long polemic against the stupidity marketed as “global warming” and “climate change”. Yeh, I know I deliberately loaded that comment, but I’ll stand behind it.

But about the book. After dispensing with the suspension of disbelief deal breaker in the plot (a bunch of unlikely-totally implausible-Scooby-dos save the world from eco-feak wack jobs and ecology industry conspirators. OK, the last part isn’t so far-fetched, but the Scoooby-dos are), the stick-figure characterizations, sometimes wooden dialog and all the other lame plot elements, I was left with a run-of-the-mill adventure story well suited to Hollyweird (save for its perspective on global warming/whatever the latest lame catchphrase might be) and… some moderately interesting, though hardly new to me, citations of actual-GASP!-scientific research into climate change.

And frankly, for those who have been brainwashed by Hollyweird, the Mass Media Podpeople’s Army, Cracked Ivory Tower Academia Nuts, and the whole melange of Loony Left Moonbats, eco-freaks, eco-nazis and their ilk about climate, this book (and hopefully others like it but better-written) may hold out some slim hope of sanity.

Yes, the novel does exaggerate some things and postulate a semi-plausible conspiracy to manipulate people by inducing a “state of fear”, but the basic info about the non-scientific, UNREASONING and unreasonable nature of global warming posturers is spot on, and worth injecting into the public consciousness.

I’d suggest that those who don’t particularly appreciate Crichton’s fiction style (count me as one, although he seems to have his moments of good writing in every book of his I’ve read) nevertheless read the book’s appendices and check out the bibliography. Some good reading in the biblio, much of it-or abstracts of some-available on the internet. You will have to do your own searches for the material, though, unless you have dead tree copies in your own library (like the Rachel Carson cover-to-cover lie, Silent Spring I have buried in a box) or a decent public or university library available… and there’s always interlibrary loan, you know.

Frankly, most folks won’t be bothered too much by the massive implausibilities in the plot and would enjoy the read… although most will also-sadly, cos they are surprisingly good; the best parts of the book, in fact-skip over the lil sermonettes on science vs. eco-voodoo.

Crichton does make the common mistake of many accolytes of materialistic positivism in believing scientific knowledge is the only real knowledge, but I can forgive him that blind spot for the service he does in describing in vernacular some of the differences between the voodoo that’s presented as scientific knowledge by the media, politicians *spit* and dumbasses in academia who are either just playing pseudo-scientific politics or regularly speak with assurance about things they know nothing about.

BTW, I missed noting Rachel Carson, arguably the biggest mass murderer in history via the influence of her lies, in my roundup of “Worst Americans” and only realized my faux pas when I saw her on someone else’s list. Can’t get ’em all…

Review reviewed at Stuck on Stupid, TMH’s Bacon Bits

Happy New Year

Confession’s good for the soul… and bad for the reputation.

So be it. πŸ™‚

Anyone do new year resolutions? I haven’t for many years, because, well, after leaving youth behind several decades ago, it seemed to me that there was nothing special about a new year as opposed to a new day, new hour or new minute. At any time, any moment in my life, I can make a new decision based on either old or new information, newly viewed, understood, evaluated or re-evaluated, and set a course change. “So why a new year’s resolution?” I thought.

Nevertheless, I’ll go ahead and codify a “resolution” already being implemented and incrementally practiced.

You see, I have a schizoid kinda lifestyle. In my kitchen (and although my Wonder Woman is a fine cook, she ceded that ground to me years ago based on a balance of personal preferences, talent and abilities, scheduling flexibility (or lack thereof), etc. And in my kitchen I very much prefer to have a place for everything and everything in its place, just as my Wonder Woman prefers in the rest of her house (she is a librarian, after all). Not that I have achieved such perfection of organization in the kitchen (though woe be to he who places the black-handled whisk on the nearly-antique metal spoon’s hook near the stove! :-), nor, of course, is Wonder Woman’s home in the perfectly organized and managed state she would prefer. Let me note: that’s not her fault-I’ll explain that in a sec.

But my office and my storage areas are… a disaster. Jerry Pournelle likes to refer to his home office as “Chos Manor”. *Pfui!* In the creation and maintenance of chaos, Pournelle is a patzer compared to me.

πŸ™‚

But. (And here’s a large part of the explaination for the mess in Wonder Woman’s living room, right now.) I’ve recently boxed and labeled (and have intermediately staged on the way to a reorganized storage space) four boxes of references, archived data (CDR, floppy, packed hard drives, etc.), boxed labeled, inventoried, etc…. in the living room, along with four more large plastice tubs similarly treated. All taken from my office.

I have at least twice that much left to go, but it’s progress.

For the first time since we moved into this home more than ten years ago, there is as much free space in the garage as there is packed-away junk.

Of course, in the process of shaking out and sifting, even the kitchen is cluttered, now. *sigh*

And then there are the still uncompleted remodeling chores… that are nevertheless progressing.

New year’s resolutions? I don’t need any. All I need to do is make steady progress, day by day, a bit at a time, making my office and storage areas over into my image of my kitchen, as it were.

Yeh, when I finish the bookcase/storage/entertainment center wall in the living room, that’ll help. Probably seven or eight boxes of books (freeing up storage spaces)-properly re-catalogued (not just in my head) with discarded library management software and card catalogs. πŸ™‚

That’ll help.

But I really need to weed my parts farm. Haven’t even inventoried my “printer parts” (discarded printers I intermittently raid for repair parts) in a year. And I know there are a couple collections of old 286 and even 8088/6 computer parts/cases/power supplies I probably should have dismantled for smaller parts years ago, discarding all the large, completely unusable junk. It’s on the schedule.

So, while I’m making a temporary mess (Yeh, kids, I know: it’s an awefully looooong “temporary” – heh) of much of the rest of the house, things are thinning down in my office, storage is getting better, etc.

But it’s gonna be a bumpy ride for a while.

Thankfully, Wonder Woman is joining in the fun and purging her home office space, too. So, even when we are working on these things in different rooms, we have semi-compatible projects going, and that’s an encouragement to me to continue. Even if it’s at a 10-pounds to 1-ounce ratio of my stuff to hers.

Of course, even when all this is finished, including some of the remodeling, I’ll have the storage shed to deal with…

heh

We have waaaaay too much stuff. (And, according to that ineffable law of the universe that creates extra coat hangers out of lost paperclips and inexplicably appearing computer parts from missing coat hangers, the more stuff we discard… the more we have! heh. Really. It’s true… πŸ˜‰

Baring my soul at The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns.

A lil help, here…

What do you say when someone’s obviously not playing with a full deck, a few bricks shy of a load, a beer or two short of a six pack, one member less than a quorum? Let me get the ball rolling, and maybe a few (or both πŸ™‚ of my regular readers can add a couple. Or more.

He’s playing poker with monopoly money…

…rolling dice with marbles…

…?

Come on. Y’all can do better than those. Easily. Without resorting to Google.

πŸ™‚