Gullibility: Bad; Skepticism: Good

First, the obvious denotative meanings:

gullible: easily duped or cheated

skeptical: relating to, characteristic of, or marked by skepticism: 1 : an attitude of doubt or a disposition to incredulity either in general or toward a particular object
2 a : the doctrine that true knowledge or knowledge in a particular area is uncertain b : the method of suspended judgment, systematic doubt, or criticism characteristic of skeptics


I’d bet the post title led regular readers to think this post’d be about politics. Well, it could as easily have been, but no.

I am, on the one hand, amused by all the spam I still get that attempts to gull me into opening infected attachments. I filter my email two ways, so spam in my inbox is way down from the hundred per day I once received to just a few a day. But still, I get at least 3 or 4 emails a week with infected attachments that some spammer thinks he can fool me into opening. Such as,

Microsoft has released an update for Microsoft Outlook / Outlook Express. This update is critical and provides you with the latest version of the Microsoft Outlook / Outlook Express and offers the highest levels of stability and security.

Instructions

* Install Update for Microsoft Outlook / Outlook Express (KB910721). To do this, follow these steps:
1. Run attached file officexp-KB910721-FullFile-ENU.exe
2. Restart Microsoft Outlook / Outlook Express

Riiiight. As though Microsoft sent out critical updates as email attachments. Not. Any moron with more active brain cells than a head of cabbage would sneer at this attempt to gull users into self-infection. I didn’t even bother to rescan the thing, since it didn’t get flagged by resident AV on its way in (some don’t, you know). The “sender” was… me. That’s right, the email header was forged to make it appear that I sent the email that was supposedly from Microsoft to myself.

Silly spammer. As though such silly stunts would fool me. I do have more active brain cells than a head of cabbage. Just. *heh*

I don’t know how anyone who is able to press the “On” button on a computer could be stupid enough to fall for that, but surely after viewing the following information, even a head of cabbage would hesitate to open any attachment:

(Yeh, I smudged some of the info in this image expanded header.)

Of course, if I’d been either operating Thunderbird Portable in a sandbox or viewing my mail in a Mint or PCBSD VM at the time, I’d have played around with the attachment a bit. As it is, I didn’t even open it in a sandbox with a text editor. Why play with it when I know I’d just end up deleting it anyway?

So I did. Just delete it. With extreme prejudice.

(BTW, I regularly use an “eraser” utility to scrub any files quarantined by AV, as well as to scrub both free space on my drives and page files on boot. Just sayin’.)

FWIW–not suchabigdeal

Folks over at the Win7 Forums are making a big deal out of the Windows Experience Index. My Win7 Pro box that’s cobbled together from a base of a 3-year-old HP Media Center PC is a kinda low-middle-of-the-road PC. Not so much a powerhouse (although by changing out the memory and primary hard drive, it could be a lot hotter), but Good Enough for most purposes, including running several VMs on top of the host Win7 OS.

FWIW,

I don’t know what the deal is with the Aero score. 1GB of discrete video RAM on the nVidia vidcard; Aero never bobbles or hesitates; smooth as silk. Something arcane I don’t care about. Son&Heir’s monster Asus gaming notebook scores higher on gaming, memory and hard drive marks but about the same on Aero scoring, so I’m not at all sure that the Aero score matters at all to my own experience.

Especially since I do much of my computing in Linux Mint in a VM. *heh*

A Lil Book Searching for Its Raison D’รชtre

I guess you’d have to be me (or someone who’s tired of grading “grad” papers from subliterates) for this to bother you,

“But the Dock is so much more than just eye candy. It’s an ever-accessible venue where [sic] your frequently-used applications can call ‘home’.”

Sadly, this is typical of the writing in the otherwise excellent and useful (to newbies and those who need even more hand-holding than the Mac straight jacket already provides), “The Mac Manual” from makeuseof.com.

While there’s nothing really ground-breaking, and really nothing that someone of average intelligence cannot figure oput on their own, for those who find Windows just toooo hard and those who just want to know how to use the oh-so “intuitive” Mac interface more quickly, this is a very nice cheat sheet.

69 pages with loads of nice white space makes “The Mac Manual” from (makeuseof.com) and really quick read and even a handy enchiridion for incurious or lazy newbie Mac users.

But yeh, I have a copy of it and may even carry it with me for the next Mac user I meet who needs some help. ๐Ÿ™‚

What a Chuckle

What’s so humorous? Apple’s $80+ “Magic Mouse” (with prices all the way up to $130!). For $80+, IF you have a compatible Apple product to use it with (otherwise, you can shell out even more for a Bluetooth interface), it can almost duplicate–after making modifications to the way the OS normally uses a mouse (why! you can actually have it emulate a TWO-BUTTON MOUSE! *pfui*)–what my lil $30 Logitech wireless RF mouse can do. Oh, wait. That was $30 with the wireless keyboard as well… And with shipping.

*feh*

Well, I do have to admit that it will do a couple (but only a couple) of things my setup won’t, but since it’ll ONLY do them with compatible Apple products (and some very recent Apple products will need additional–can you say, “More $$”?–hardware just to use this “Magic Mouse”), and even then, are “features” more searching for users than features users search for. What? I need something that lets me, “swipe left and right along the Multi-Touch surface to advance through pages in Safari or browse photos in iPhoto”? First of all, I can do the mouse gesture forward/back in Opera now, and only use one finger, so why make things harder for myself? Second, iPhoto? Who wants to use iPhoto?

Wait. That two-finger gesture thingy doesn’t count, since I can do it with one finger, so that’s only ONE thing this over-priced dummy-catcher can do that my cheapo Logitech wireless mouse can’t. What’s the other thing? 360 degree “pan”. I’m still trying to imagine a use I might put that to. Sure, it’s a “gee-whiz” feature, but useful? I can scroll up n down (and left-right in most apps) with my lil cheapie Logitech mouse. Good enough. 360 degree “panning”? Sell me on it, if you can.(You can’t)

Apple’s Magic Mouse: just the thing for folks with more money than brains and worth a few chuckles for the rest of us.


N.B. Apple does make some very fine hardware. MacBook Pros, for example, can make very nice Windows machines. Well, apart from that quirky Mac keyboard. Which just highlights the main issue I still have with Macs. Why not just buy some very fine hardware (for less than equivalent Apple hardware) and if one wants a BSD-based OS (like OS X) just install PCBSD? A very nearly bulletproof OS with LOADS of free software, suitable for almost any user’s needs: what’s not to like. Heck, it can even be “skinned” to be more maclike, if one should desire such a thing.

And it works with real mice and keyboards. ๐Ÿ™‚

Speedtest.net

Well, since my last go-around with ISP, things have been “not bad”.

Pretty indicative of things since my last marathon call-in to ISP… Apparently, someone there is neglecting their assignment to screw things up.

VOIP is back sounding decent. Uploads/Downloads working properly. Mail works. And web pages load well, as long as I don’t switch my router back to using my ISP’s Domain Name Servers. If I do that, I can still count on having to attempt loading pages multiple times. (My first-listed DNS is one of OpenDNS‘s servers; so’s my second. The third-listed DNS is one of Google’s. Better reliability and uptime, it seems. Quick resolution. In addition, I have OpenDNS set up to filter things according to my preferences. What’s not to like? All of ’em beat the socks off the DNS offered by my ISP.)

Another VM

So, I just got tired of the limitations of the “Windows XP Mode” VM running on a Win7 Pro host. It worked, was stable and had most WinXP features available, but it just wasn’t the whole enchilada. So, back to VirtualBox and on with a (spare) copy of WinXP in a VB VM.

Installed slick as goose… urm, grease. Took a hair less time than installing on bare metal on a physical machine, mainly, I suppose, because the virtual hard drive formatted in a flash.

I’m not much of a fan of Windows XP–never really warmed to it–and the Virtualbox VM isn’t as completely integrated with Win7 as the M$ VM, but it works, and the whole enchilada is available for when I need to walk someone through some steps over the phone. It’d be entirely unnecessary, of course, if I could do all remote support with direct remote access to the computer in question, but not everyone has broadband (still) and remote access is impossible over dialup–besides the fact that some issues cannot be addressed with remote access, anyway.

Not all that big a thing. It’s just WinXP anyway.

A Useful Tip for Advanced Win7 Users

If there actually be such critters. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Create a new folder on your desktop. Rename the folder anything you want, followed by

.{ED7BA470-8E54-465E-825C-99712043E01C}

(Yes, the period begins the text to copy-paste in the file name, just like a hidden file or folder in Linux.)

It’s that part I’ve included above in the blockquoted section that’s important, because it creates a folder that’s chock full of user controls that are not otherwise easily accessible via the GUI. Sure, some–even most–of them can be accessed via various buried dialog boxes, but quick and easy access to 15 “Action Center” applets/controls, 10 Admin tools, management for all attached devices and much, much more all in one location is pretty neat.

Warning: some of these tools and applets can get the naive user in trouble, so don’t come crying to me if you fit the bill and go ahead and play in this sandbox. But if you have a good idea what you’re doing and make fairly frequent Restore Points, back up your system regularly, nothing in this collection will toast your Win7 install.

And it’s just too handy for words to have it all in one place. Especially in a Windows box. Very nice.

Minor Gripe With Win7 Disappears

The chief appeal of Windows 7 for me has been the much-improved Windows Media Center. In fact, WMC is what convinced me to finally bid farewell to all my travails attempting to make an HTPC work right in Linux.*

But.

The proprietary “wtv” format WMC uses to record television shows has been the one and only gripe I’ve had. Every now and then, I’ve made desultory searches for a way to deal with the issue of burning off DVDs from WMC, since doing it “the Microsoft way” results–at best–in archive copies that are good for that alone, copies that cannot be played in an ordinary DVD player.

Now, that’d be OK if I had also gotten off my lazy butt and finally built a media server and connected it to TVs that we want to view the files from, but I’ve not, and my schedule looks to become hectic in the coming months, so something to convert the files would be nice.

Here it is. Simple really. Win7 already has a built-in .wtv-to-.dvr-ms file conversion facility. From there, it was a simple thing to find a free (yeh, I am a tightwad) utility to convert the file to something usable on an ordinary DVD player.

Bob’s your uncle.

Of course, later on, with file storage on the NAS I’ll build when I get a round toit (I lost mine somewhere and need a new one) and a media server the files can be accessed through, this will become less of an issue, but for now, DVD-Rs are cheap and easy to burn.

Finally.

It’d still be nice if M$ didn’t cause this kind of thing with its proprietary file formats, but the workaround is actually simple enough, and WMC is still far, far easier to implement and use, and more “complete” than any other approach I’ve found.


*Don’t get me wrong. I still use Linux Mint for a primary work platform (and other OSes for other uses), just running in a Virtualbox VM on a Win7 host. It’s just easier that way to have the advantages of Linux and still use WMC to record those shows we do want to watch, but in “time-shifted” mode–in better-than-hulu quality.

M$ Virtual PC, XP Mode

Well, I’ve used VMWare’s virtualization with Windows 7 hosting Ubuntu (and had earlier used it in Ubuntu with VMs for another version of Ubuntu, Windows XP, Windows 98, PCBSD and several other Linux distros). Did NOT like the way the newest VMWare VMs worked with Win7. At all.

I have Linux Mint installed in a Virtualbox VM hosted by Win7. Works great. Love it–and the way Virtualbox integrates well and does full screen nicely.

I have tried to like M$’s Windows 7 XP Mode running under M$ Virtual PC. Really, I have tried to like it–and there are some things to like. Full integration with ALL the hardware on the host machine, right “out of the box” with no need for additions or extensions. OK, that’s nice. But XP Mode will NOT run full screen and still allow access to the Win7 host (and that’s just plain stupid–requires three CLICKs to get back to a Win7 app running behind the fullscreen mode WinXP or over to another VM running in Virtualbox–dumb, really dumb, M$); customizing the GUI is either a PITA or not enabled. IOW, it’s a subset of WinXP running in “crippled mode” for those times when one simply cannot get an essential older app to run in compatibility mode, or when one wants a basic interface to serve as a visual aid in phone support or some such.

But WinXP mode using M$’s Virtual PC is nothing near as complete as a real WinXP running as a guest under VMWare’s offerings or under Virtualbox (and yes, I did try that as well, hosted in Ubuntu, though at the time I could only install a 32-bit version using Virtualbox). Still, I suppose it does have a limited usefulness, although it’s certainly not reason enough for most folks to spend the extra money to upgrade to Win7 Pro (or Ultimate). Win7 Home Premium is certainly Good Enough for those folks who simply MUST use Windows–and I suppose I fall into that category now that I’ve become enamored with Windows Media Center in its now mature iteration in Win7. (Still, I’m very glad to be able to do most things in Linux Mint, hosted in a VM in Win7 :-))

Speaking of different versions of Win7, what features do Pro and Ultimate have that’re so appealing that one might upgrade to one of those versions (for more $$ of course) instead of Home Premium? “…let me ‘splain. No, there’s too much. Let me sum up.”

Windows 7 Pro has only three features not found in Windows 7 Home Premium:

  1. XP Mode
  2. Domain support
  3. Backup to a networked drive

XP Mode? You already have my take.

Most folks on a home network do NOT need support for joining a domain. Businesses? Quite likely (which it is why it’s called Windows 7 Professional), but not necessarily in the cases of many small businesses.

The last was my reason for “going pro” when I purchased my upgrade. Well, that and the fact that I could purchase it for the same price as Home Premium, but that’s another story. Most folks won’t even need the ability to do backups to a networked drive built into the OS. Windows 7–all versions, IIRC–has a very capable backup program that can do backups–even disk mirroring–to various media. The Pro version just adds native ability to back up to networked drives. If a home user wants to do that, more than likely their best bet is to purchase an NAS (Network Attached Storage) device which will more than likely have networked backup ability built into the device.

Geeks preferring to build their own NAS might appreciate the native ability in Win7 Pro to do networked backups.

As for Win7 Ultimate, all it adds to the Pro version is Bitlocker encryption (and freebie solutions to do everything Bitlocker does and more abound) and support for an additional 35 languages. Most folks will need neither of those. Heck, I won’t even use Spanish any more, because of the Mexican government’s active support for outlaw invasion and subversion of the US. Yep. I’m boycotting a language because of misbehavior by the Mexican kleptocratic kakistocracy. *heh*


N.B. I do like the “java” background (pic above) that’s been around since at least Win2K. When I want to rest my eyes a bit, I can just let ’em “defocus” while looking at the background and my icons and mouse pointer appear to “float” on top of a background that seems to be about 2′ behind them. Nice optical illusion. ๐Ÿ™‚

I Want It!

Nice enough, but I want to hook it up into home automation hardware/software. Heck, I want to hook it up into some robotics… send a robot on down to the PO to pick up my mail, to the grocery to buy some munchies, to the kitchen to cook up dinner (and then serve it), to a client’s to work on some hardware. Now, that’d really let me sit n veg out, lard on the fat, whatever.

This isn’t nearly to that point yet–not even within an order of magnitude “near”–but it is cool enough for what it can do. Hmmm, with voice recognition software integrated, it could enable a lot more “hands free” computing. Too bad it’s just for gaming at this point, since I have just about zero interest in that.