Windows Firewalls

I’ve never had any trouble with personal firewalls in Linux passing various tests. In Windows? Notsomuch.

Here’s the deal: right now I depend on my router’s firewall as a first line of defense. NAT and SPI help quite a bit on the router end, and most folks who have a broadband connection really, really should connect through a router with both NAT and SPI.

But most folks, including me, need another layer of protection. I used to run a Linux box that was nothing but a firewall, but keeping it up proved to be a tad of a pain, and it was a dedicated computer, using more wattage, needing more cooling, etc. Windows Firewall is finally almost good enough for the average user to have as a second layer of defense on their personal computer, but not quite good enough, as it’s not very (*heh*) good at blocking suspicious outbound traffic. I’m fine with it on my Win7 box, as the traffic that needs blocking is almost universally the result of self-infection with a worm, keylogger, etc., that “phones home”… and I’ve (not yet) infected any of my own computers with, well, anything. (Going on 25 years “virus” free. It’s not really that hard. Of course, the front end of that was not web related, although there was some internet use even back then where I could have infected myself had I been careless.)

But most folks aren’t paranoid enough to keep themselves malware free, so a decent personal firewall to complement their router firewall and anti-malware front line software is a pretty good idea.

Right now, I’m pretty happy with the testing I’ve done with Comodo Firewall. It’s a part of Comodo’s free Internet Security download. Note that the download includes Comodo’s anti-virus and a couple of other things I’d avoid installing were I you. ๐Ÿ˜‰ Comodo’s antivirus may have imnproved since I last gave it a try, but it was such a resource hog, intrusive and slow then that I avoided even trying it out when I decided to give the firewall another try. The other two pieces of crudware are a search bar and something else I don’t recall. Just untick them on installation of the firewall.

After a few days of trial, I can say I kinda like the free Comodo Firewall. It does bug the user about new programs attempting to access the internet, but most personal firewalls do that. It also asks about changes to system files when installing new software. Some users may find that confusing, but it’s not that intrusive–certainly not any more intrusive than Vista’s nagging, and much more pointed and useful, IMO. Still, some folks may find that off-putting. It can be turned off in the user control interface, though, should one desire.

Easily “Good Enough” IMO.

There are other Windows personal firewalls out there, but none of the other free ones are either good enough or well-mannered enough–or good enough AND well-mannered enough–for my taste. (I abhor “free” software that nags about “upgrading” to a paid version. Just Go Away already!)


Update: For all PCs (yeh, Macs, too), the basics of personal computing security–the very basics–can be covered by

  • A router-based firewall
  • An anti-malware software suite (including a good personal firewall on all networked computers)
  • A way to stay up-to-date with security patches for both Windows and your applications
  • A secure browser

That said, the devil’s in the details…


Rabbit trail: I did like it enough that I installed it on the “new” (a 3.4Ghz refurb) computer I’m readying for my dad to take home with him after Lovely Daughter’s wedding. At 86 (with his 87th birthday anniversary approaching), he’s ceertainly capable of handling Comodo Firewall’s prompts, and it’ll keep him safer on the interwebs as he’s running around on WinXP Pro. (Yes, I did consider Win7, but he’s well used to XP, now, and there’s no sense making that transition right now. Ditto a transition to Unbuntu or some other easy-to-use alternative to XP. Besides, on the Linux front, Magic Jack still doesn’t have capabilities there, and he does like his Magic Jack :-))

CDBurnerXP: A Nice Addition for Windows Users

While Linux users are usually offered a wealth of options for burning CDs and DVDs using software that’s “automagically” installed with almost all modern distros, Windows users have usually felt compelled to go out and buy Nero or Roxio software to have more than the very basic burning included with recent versions of Windows. Now, Windows 7 does have more capable burning options than previous versions built into its default installation, and the Roxio and Nero softwares are certainly very capable, but… I want free and very capable.

DeepBurner is pretty good, and certainly surpasses the abilities of Windows’ built in functionality, but it’s just not good enough to have me use it in preference to the nearly good enough burning capabilities Windows has on its own.

Enter CDBurnerXP. All it’s missing as compared to Roxio or Nero are some audiophile-oriented recording and leveling tricks (and the free Audacity does a superior job with those things). This is one seriously good piece of free software. Using it to burn copies of a mix CD for Lovely Daughter’s wedding (2 weeks and three days away :-)) is an exercise in simplicity. Very nice. Handles creation of DVDs, audio and data CDs/DVDs, burns ISOs and creates bootable disks very easily, among its many capabilities.

Now, most of that is fairly easily done with Win7’s built in capabilities, but not all. Most can be done with DeepBurner–just not all, or as easily. Roxio’s and Nero’s solutions can do everything CDBurnerXP can do and a little bit more, of course, but why pay $50-$100 for capabilities that are available for free? Seriously, if Roxio or Nero want me to buy their product, they’d need to add some serious capabilities, like making my coffee or doing my laundry or some such. *heh*

Comparable capabilities via free software in Linux are almost too many to list (OK, I’m just too lazy to do so), but something this capable in free software for Windows is a nice find. I’d used earlier versions of CDBurnerXP some years ago and dropped using it because its capabilities just weren’t extensive enough at the time. Now? In Windows sessions, it’s my go-to app for burning optical media.

New Joke from M$ for Windows Users

From Ryan Naraine of ZDNet, this funny:

This monthโ€™s batch of patches will NOT include a fix for the recent Internet Explorer vulnerability that was publicly discussed earlier this week. That vulnerability could allow attackers to run arbitrary code from a Web site if they could convince a user to visit the web page and then get them to press the F1 key in response to a pop up dialog box.

Microsoft has released Security Advisory 981169 with suggested pre-patch workarounds for affected IE users.

Hilarious. The M$ “Security Advisory” doesn’t, of course, issue the obvious (and effective) “fix” for the Internet Exploder vulnerability: DON’T USE INTERNET EXPLODER!

Oh, those jolly pranksters at Microsoft!

“Of shoes and ships and sealing wax, of carpenters and kings… “

IOW, this is yet another post avoiding politics and current events. Oh, I suppose I could revert to “Kipling Tuesday” and let his ascerbic words on “current events of yore” stand in stead of my own poor commentary, but I just don’t feel like doing that today.

Instead, how’s that browser war going for ya?

*heh*

I’m still down on Internet Exploder and every version of Chrome I’ve given a shot at my eyeballs. Safari and Firefox are about dead even with me on the scale of “so-so-to-lukewarm” and the newest Opera has some “features” that were initially a bit off-putting.

Yeh, how’s that for a surprise? Me, issuing a mini-micro-nano-pan of any version of Opera. Well, the latest Opera 10.50 beta had me ticked off for a bit when the menu bar was AWOL. That meant accessing all sorts of functions from erasing private data to customizing keyboard shortcuts were hidden. I guess that’s fine if Opera wanted to be Chrome, but it chapped my gizzard. Oh. Accessible–mostly–from the new “Opera button” on the left side of the Tab Bar, but only mostly. To get the full spread, I had to use that “O” button to reinstall the menu bar. It would certainly have been nice for Opera to have noted that lil “feature” somewhere on the “New Features” page that is linked to on the “Starting Opera” page that is loaded on the first start of the browser, but no, had to dig and fumble around for it. An astounding misplay by Opera Software.

Still, once I had access to importing my bookmarks and had recustomized some things, the 10.50 beta did seem to be just the ticket to wipe out the bad taste of other recent browser tryouts. For a wee taste of just one feature that Opera still maintains that is at least an order of magnitude better than other browsers I’ve tried to like, here’s a screen shot of one of the multi-tabbed “Preferences” dialogs with a drill-down mini-dialog popped up:

Of course, the multiple, granularized preferences dialogs available in easy-peasy GUI format from within the browser are just the tip of the iceberg in Opera customization. Since it also uses easily-edited ini files, it’s even more customizable that way. And, of course, additional tweaks are available via opera:config typed into the addressbar. Multiple power levels of customizing available multiple, easily-accessed (once the “menu button for dummies–or Chrome-Firefox-Safari-Internet Exploder users”–is deactivated *heh*)

And wide-ranging customization via features already built into the browser is just one of many reasons I prefer Opera over its imitators. *heh*

Windows Command Line Tools for Users

I’ve used the command line less over the years, since the “good old days” of DOS filtering all the folks who could NOT manage linear thinking were filtered over to Mac. But eventually the laziness inculcated by easy-peasy GUIs managed to dull my command line “skilz”… making my relatively recent increase in use of ‘nix boxes more challenging for quite a while.

Still, I do use Windows in various incarnations a lot. But keeping command line skills from rusting has been a challenge. But since so very many things, even nowadays in the easy-peasyest Windows GUI of all, Win7, can still be best done at the command line, it’s a useful skill set that any moderately advanced Windows user ought to never let fade. Here’s a really great reference to help out in that regard: a command line reference for Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 and Vista. Really useful for Windows users to have, IMO.

And here’s a fun little trick using one of those commands to cut one mouse click off a reboot. *heh*

    RIGHT-Click on the desktop and select New>Shortcut
    In the Text box, type

    shutdown /r /t 30

    OK your way out (naming the shortcut anything you want)

The “30” is the time in seconds to reboot from invoking the command. You can, of course, set it to other time in increments of one second.

There, now instead of CLICK-ing Start>Shutdown(arrow)>Restart, you can simply CLICK on Show Desktop>Restart (as I named my shortcut). Or, if you wanted to save another CLICK, just put the shortcut on your Taskbar. (In Win7, RIGHT-CLick>Pin to Taskbar.) Then it’d be a one-click reboot.

A number of other parameters can be invoked to custom tailor just about whatever shutdown behavior you want to invoke.

And that’s just one of an abundant alphabet soup of powerful (OK, sometimes just fun) command line tricks at your fingertips. Batch files are a great way to automate some everyday maintenance using command line tools as well, but without a lot of time drilling those commands (and all the available switches) into one’s brain, OR a good reference like the one at M$TechNet referenced above, simple tools to simplify one’s life are not that simple to come by. *heh*

Micro-Mini-windows Tip

If your computer is running Windows 7, you may have noticed that the command line trick for verifying system files that’s been around for a decade–sfc /scannow typed in a run dialog–needs something more to work, now.

Open a command prompt with administrator priviledges:

Start>Search: cmd
Right click on the command found and select, “Run as administrator”

(Vista’s a tad different and I’m just not going to mess with it. If you have Vista, upgrade. No, seriously. I have no help for you. Figure it out on your own.)

In the command line window, type

sfc /scannow

(Note the space between “sfc” and “/scannow”) And press Enter.

It’ll run as it always has, verifying that your system files are uncorrupted. If it needs to replace one, and you’ve not placed the installation files on your hard drive and edited the registry to make Windows aware of where, you may be asked to place your installation DVD in your optical drive if a file needs to be replaced. This isn’t all that common, though, since Windows caches copies of most essential system files.

Oh, if you’ve been a Windows user for more than a decade and haven’t discovered the “sfc /scannow” command before now, just pass this on to the 13-year-old who maintains your computer for you. *heh*

I really need to put a tip jar on my sidebar… ๐Ÿ˜‰

Continue reading “Micro-Mini-windows Tip”

WTV Files: A Better Way?

OK, I’ve been right-clicking on Windows Media Center .wtv files and selecting “Convert to dvr-ms” one at a stinking time so I can then convert that to a format that’s able to be written to a DVD for playing anywhere, and it’s gotten old already. Yeh, yeh, call me lazy. Call me doubly lazy, since I could just set up another external drive (but make it a humongous 1.5TB drive, cos the files are about 3GB per hour of recorded video) to store the things on. But. keeping wtv files isn’t in the cards for me anyway, since some programs also record with DRM junk that voids the recording after a given period of time. Not appreciating DRM. (Anti-DRM: I still have some old Tom Baker “Dr. Who” episodes on VHS. No making unplayable by remote DRM management for those puppies, and I’m NOT accepting it now for new recordings.)

Dug around, and other folks feel the same way. Here’s a possible solution: WTVWatcher. I’ve scanned the thing for malware every which way from Sunday and it has come up clean so far. Does it work? Well, yes, it does. It watches the folder I specified (NOT my Recorded TV folder, another one where I put recordings I want converted), and then automagically converts whatever .wtv files are in the folder to dvr-ms. From there, I can convert the dvr-ms files into whatever I want to burn to optical media. Heck, for the shows that are going to be viewed on the old analog TV, that can even be avi onto CD! It’s as good as old VHS…

WTVWatcher uses the WTVConverter.exe app that’s included in the \\Windows\ehome folder where WMC resides. It’s the same app that’s invoked when using the right-click>convert to dvr-ms context menu schtick, but the script just automates it by watching the folder specified by the user and converting any and all .wtv files there. Easy-peasy, and seems to work just fine.

One word of caution: when the thing converts .wtv files to .dvr-ms it also automatically deletes the .wtv files. For me, this is a good thing. YMMV.


Additional thought: I had attempted to use WTVConverter on one .wtv file and kept getting a “WTVConverter cannot convert the file from wtv to dvr-ms… ” error, and this whether I attmpted to perform the conversion via the RIGHT-CLICK context menu or via the command line. But this lil script that uses WTVConverter to do its work churned right on through the file and produced a usable dvr-ms file. Strange. But good.


BTW, I hate commercials, so…

Trying out LifeExtender to remove commercials from dvr-ms files. I’ll drop back by to comment on how it does its job. It was written for Vista, hence the tailoring for .dvr-ms files, and hasn’t been updated for almost 2 years. I hope that’s because it works just fine the way it is. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Update: OK, LIfeExtender (so-called, because it gives one back the minutes that commercials steal *heh*) does work, and as far as I can tell hasn’t caused any video loss, but be warned: it’s a slow process. I had to just let it run while I went on and did other things, but it took several hours to scan and remove commercials from 10 programs–all but one just one-hour programs. Do note that LE isn’t perfect. It glitched up a tad on one episode of one show, inserting 20 minutes of blank screen, though none of the show was lost, and every now and then, tiny pieces of commercials remain. Still, it’s a heck of a lot handier than editing the files manually.

Another Chrome-Based Browser

Comodo, a company that offers “pretty good” security software (too resource heavy and intrusive for my taste, but good enough at what they do) is offering its version of Google’s Chrome browser, Comodo Dragon.

All the same gripes and cavils I have directed toward every other iteration of Chrome apply, save for the privacy concerns of the Google original. That said, it does offer a few enhancements of the down-version Chrome 3.x.

Features:
Improved Privacy over Chromium
Easy SSL Certificate Identification
Fast Website Access
Greater Stability and Less Memory Bloat
Incognito Mode Stops Cookies, Improves Privacy
Very easy to switch from your Browser to the Dragon

Still, it gets a “Fail” from me. It offered to import my default browser’s saved passwords, bookmarks (which it called favorites–should have clued me in right there) and… didn’t, though it reported success. I left the box marked “Start Comodo Dragon” checkmarked when I clicked Finish and… of course it did not.

If it grows up, maybe it’ll be a fire-breating monster browser, but as it is, it’s just a useless-to-me skink. If I want really secure browsing, I’ll fire up a sandbox and open OperaTor.

Comodo Dragon? Not a keeper for me.


Oh, a word: the site says 32-bit Windows required, but that is, of course, hooey. Runs as well as it can (that is to say, with all the limitations of any version of Chrome) on 64-bit Windows. Not a well thought out “requirements” list. Probably ought to read “minimum requirements”.

Yet Another (Sort of) Compgeeky Post

My excuse is that this is only moderately geeky. I put my hands on a book that is the subject of this post for the first time today. Since Windows 7 is going on more and more computers here in America’s Third World County (and a surprising number of folks are buying new computers with Windows 7 already onboard), I figured I’d take a look at one of the better-rated (OK, I just saw it mentioned in a few columns) tutorial books to see what was what. After all, my use of the OS has led me to think of it as something no one really needs training for, so surely this must be chock full of deep, dark mojo.

Nah. The book? Windows 7 Step By Step. My first take? This is a book for folks who still ride bikes with training wheels. Seriously. Like something one would write for those rare disaffected Mac users trying out this “Windoze thang”.

And right off the bat, it tries to pitch folks on buying new hardware with comments like, “If your existing computer runs Windows XP, it might be able to run Windows 7, but it likely won’t support Aero.”

Well, pardon me, but I’ve installed Win7 for folks on aging XP computers running on integrated graphics chipsets that use system memory in place of video memory and not had a problem with Aero yet. Perhaps if one digs back to some nine-year-old Xp computers that can’t handle more than 512MB of system memory, with onboard graphics only, well, sure they’ll not handle Aero, but Microsoft specifically disclaims the idea of attempting to run Win7 on less than 1GB of system memory, anyway.

Nah. This book is for people who’ve never used a computer–let alone a Windows computer–before in their lives. It’s what you might give to Great Aunt Sadie, if you were to give her a Windows computer (when you could give her a perfectly good computer running a free OS instead. After all, she’s probably only going to use it, if she can master the concept at all, for email and web browsing and a few other uncomplicated things.).

Pass. Glad I decided to check it out of the library instead of buying it. *heh*