“Are You Too Stupid to Vote?”

That’s a question I’d like you to consider asking folks between now and November 4 (and any time an election approaches). Sure, you may offend some folks, but if so, they’ve just proven themselves Too Stupid to Vote. After all, it’s only a question, right? *heh*

Follow that question up with a basic civics quiz, such as this one (just copy the thing if you want. What’re they gonna do? Sue you for spreading civics awareness? *feh*). If they can’t pass with such gimme questions as these, then they don’t deserve the franchise.

1. What was the source of the following phrase: “Government of the people, by the people, for the people?”

The speech: “I Have a Dream”

Declaration of Independence

U.S. Constitution

Gettysburg Address

2. What is the main reason the Pilgrims and Puritans came to America?

To practice their religion freely

To make more money and live a better life

To build a democratic government

To expand the lands controlled by the king of England

3. Many people opposed ratification of the Constitution without a bill of rights because they…

Were afraid the states would be too powerful without a bill of rights

Thought that a bill of rights would strengthen the President’s power

Did not want the national government to have an army

Feared that the new national government would deny people their rights

4. The document that contains the basic rules used to run the United States government is…

The Declaration of Independence

Magna Carta

The Mayflower Compact

The Constitution

5. What is the purpose of the Bill of Rights?

To say how much Americans should pay in taxes

To protect freedoms like freedom of speech

To describe the jobs of the President and Congress

To make Washington, D.C., the capital of the United States

6. Who is widely considered to be the “Father of the Constitution?”

George Washington

Thomas Jefferson

Benjamin Franklin

James Madison

7. What is the President’s role in making laws?

The President can rewrite some parts of the Constitution

The President can declare laws unconstitutional

The President can sign congressional bills into law

The President can remove members of Congress from office

8. What are the three parts of the federal (national) government of the United States?

Republican, Democrat and Independent

Legislative, executive and judicial

Local, state and federal

State, national and international

9. According to the Constitution, a person must meet certain requirements in order to be eligible to become president. Name one of these requirements.

Must be at least 34 years of age

Must have voted in the last three federal elections

Must have lived in the United States for at least 14 years

Must be a member of a major political party

10. How many Representatives are there in Congress?

420

425

430

435

11. America declared independence from what country during the Revolutionary War?

France

England

Spain

Canada

12. How many amendments are there to the Constitution?

10

14

27

30

13. And finally, for the 13th question — what is the significance of the number 13 in U.S. History?

It is the official “lucky” number

There were 13 Founding Fathers

The original 13 colonies

There are 13 amendments in the Bill of Rights

I mean, seriously now! It’s a flippin’ multiple choice gimme quiz. Pass it for the franchise? Heck, I’m of the opinion that if someone doesn’t at least know everything on this lil simpleton (dumbed down for the enstupiated) quiz then they shouldn’t even be a citizen, let alone be allowed to vote…

Heck, face it. Most American citizens who now possess the right to vote don’t know the fundamentals of our government structure, our history or anything genuine about current events (most still getting their information from the Mass Media Podpeople Hivemind propaganda machine).

Too stupid to be allowed to vote, and yet it is this mass of stupid people who will elect the congresscritters and administration that will exercise power.

Scary.

Pundits exercise their skills of blowhardery, bloviating about “the wisdom of the people” and whatnot, but as someone *cough* has wisely said,

“In a democracy (”rule by mob”), those who refuse to learn from history are in the majority and dictate that everyone else suffer for their ignorance.”-third world county’s corollary to Santayana’s Axiom

Doomed?


Trackposted to Rosemary’s Thoughts, Mark My Words, , Right Truth, The World According to Carl, Shadowscope, DragonLady’s World, The Pink Flamingo, Cao’s Blog, Democrat=Socialist, and Stageleft, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

9 Replies to ““Are You Too Stupid to Vote?””

  1. I’m with you, this is multiple choice, folks have no excuse not to pass with flying colors.

    But yes, some people are too stupid to vote, and yet they do and they influence who gets elected.

    Doomed

  2. This accounts for why we are so interested in the unimportant: “Lipstick, etc.,” “How many homes, blah?,” “What shoes he has…,” party labels. And why we expend so much intellectual (?) energy to justify our obsession with these non-issues. As you aggregate higher, the populations’ intellect begins to recede into infantilism. We should be embarrassed.

  3. Yes. AGREE. Wholeheartedly.

    We give people a test before we allow them to drive a car, but we allow any fool to wield a vote that can be much more dangerous to his fellow man.

    I agree. Tests every 8 years to keep your right to vote.

  4. *heh* The one that jumped out at me was,

    9. According to the Constitution, a person must meet certain requirements in order to be eligible to become president. Name one of these requirements.

    Must be at least 34 years of age

    Must have voted in the last three federal elections

    Must have lived in the United States for at least 14 years

    Must be a member of a major political party

    How many folks would think, “Hmmm, is it 34 or 35?” and missed the residency requirement? 😉

    And then, the number of amendments. “Back in tghe day”–my first consciousness of an American History class–there were a whoping 23 amendments. By the time I was well out of college, 26. I was so overwhelmed with “life as we know it” that I barely even noted Amendment 27 when it passed in 1992. I recall thinking at the time, “Yeh, sure. That’ll make a BIG difference. Not.”

  5. LOL. Those comments cracked me up. (Hi Debbie!) I would agree that many people would not pass the first grade civics exam, but I’m against testing. I still have a bad taste in my mouth from the Poll Tax. *SPIT*

    I understand the frustration. I have it myself. But what happened to ‘common’ sense? Remember, it always was a RARE commodity. 😉

    Thanks for the great post.

  6. Rather than rely on a test, I think they should change the way we vote; those on the dole from any government agency don’t get to vote for one year after they get off the dole, and then they only get to vote if they pass this kind of test. That would change a few pandering blow hards way of getting elected.

  7. TF, I’ve proposed before that NO ONE who draws a check based on federal monies (that would include State checks dependant on federal funds, like welfare checks) or recieves ANY “feddle gummint” benefits (yes, that’d include Scial Security recipients), be allowed to vote–excepting only those serving in the armed forces. Yes, I’d exclude any federal law enforcement agency employees from the franchise until well after they’d left “feddle gummint” employment. For a multitude of reasons.

    NO ONE who benefits from the feddle gummint should have a say in how it is run.

    States should set their own criteria.

    But both state and federal ballots should only be available to those who both belong to the pool of non-federal-benefit citizens AND who can pass a basic (though frankly mre detailed than the dumbass test above) civics exam.

    Oooo! How aweful I’d exclude illiterates (at least 60% of the general population) and those who are ignorant of the fundamentals of our government(s). (Hmmm, that’d probably push the total to about 90% of the population excluded from the franchise.)

    What’d make it better? Laws making it a felony to lie or make false representations in political campaigns. Such felonies to be punished by heavy fines (half or more of the total family net worth of perpetrators) and hard labor–making little rocks out of big ones is traditional and would suit me just fine.

    Heck, I’d not care one whit if such draconian measures meant tht half the congressional seats went unfilled. As a matter of fact, I’d probably be quite pleased if we “suffered” a dearth of politicians *spit* as a result.

  8. Rosemary, I understand your distaste for the poll taxes, but, although this sort of “test” might well exclude some of the same folks those poll taxes did, it’d be fair and across-the-board exclusion of dumbasses, idiots and enstupiated Americans (Oh my!).

    The voting booth is no place for expressing ones stupidity. Or rather, it’s one of the prime places for doing so, nowadays, and that’s more than simply frightening. (Oh! How I wish a few more people were able to–and did–read Ortega y Gasset’s “Revolt of the Masses“… )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *