“In Defense of Graphic Novels”
I must admit that when I was a (very) young lad, I enjoyed both “graphic novels” and comic books–and viewed them as separate classes of reading. Then again, the “graphic novels” I was exposed to 60 years ago were Classics Illustrated that whetted my appetite for the “uncondensed” versions, so I’m a bit at sea as to the new (well, to me) “graphic novel” genre. Although I long ago left highly-illustrated fiction behind me, I too appreciate the place such works can have in enjoyable reading experiences, and in expanding literacy (if the accompanying text is literately-written). I can even see a place for such works as a reader advances in literacy, just for entertainment’s sake if nothing else. Advancing educational goals through enforced rejection of such pleasure reading isn’t, necessarily–advancing educational goals, that is.
Still, most readers would, IMO, benefit from eventually “graduating” to other reading materials, even though that would not necessarily mean leaving “graphic novels” and comic books behind entirely. Of course, looking at the typical reading matter of a normal “adult” American (social media “memes,” captioned “cute cat pics,” and highly-illustrated–with photos–popular magazines, etc.), it doesn’t seem that many Americans go much beyond comic book reading, anyway.
Sometimes, “educators” vitiate learning by sucking any joy at all out of it.