Take Back Your Government

What would you pay to get the tools to take back our government and save our country?

From the author’s preface to Take Back Your Government:

HOW TO SAVE YOUR COUNTRY

This is intended to be a practical manual of instruction for the American layman who has taken no regular part in politics, has no personal political ambitions, and no desire to make money out of politics, but who, nevertheless, would like to do something to make his or her chosen form of government work better. If you have a gnawing, uneasy feeling that you should be doing something to preserve our freedoms and to protect and improve our way of life but have been held back by lack of time, lack of money, or the helpless feeling that you individually could not do enough to make the effort worthwhile, then this book was written for you.

Take Back Your Government (Click for larger image)

The book is currently being sold by Baen Books in a bundle with Taxpayer’s Tea Party by Sharon Cooper and Chuck Asay. The cost for both books bundled together in any of a wide range of eBook formats is just $8. I’m currently reading my copy of Take Back Your Government in my web browser in the html version.

Taxpayer's Tea Party Manual

Santelli’s Chicago Tea Party

As seen at Cathouse Chat:

Go watch the video (CNBC doesn’t allow embedding of the thing).

Go vote in the poll.

Money quote:

“The government’s promoting bad behavior”– Rick Santelli

Well, *duh*. What do you call the 40+ year quagmire of the “War on Poverty”? (Hint: “promoting bad behavior”) What do you call the complete disinterest in enforcing immigration law? (Hint: “promoting bad behavior”) Heck, what do you call the TSA? (Hint: “promoting bad behavior”)

THAT’S WHAT OUR GOVERNMENT DOES. That seems to be its primary job for the last few decades: promote bad behavior and punish good behavior. Anarcho-tyranny at its fedgov finest…


Trackposted to The Pink Flamingo, Rosemary’s Thoughts, , Woman Honor Thyself, Conservative Cat, Right Voices, and The World According to Carl, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

People of the Light?

Not talking about Mass Media Podpeople whenever “people of the light” are mentioned.

See Orson Scott Card’s article at The Rhincerous Times of Greennsboro, NC. A taste:

Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights?

by Orson Scott Card

October 20, 2008
An open letter to the local daily paper — almost every local daily paper in America:

I remember reading All the President’s Men and thinking: That’s journalism. You do what it takes to get the truth and you lay it before the public, because the public has a right to know.

This housing crisis didn’t come out of nowhere. It was not a vague emanation of the evil Bush administration.

It was a direct result of the political decision, back in the late 1990s, to loosen the rules of lending so that home loans would be more accessible to poor people. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were authorized to approve risky loans.

What is a risky loan? It’s a loan that the recipient is likely not to be able to repay.

The goal of this rule change was to help the poor — which especially would help members of minority groups. But how does it help these people to give them a loan that they can’t repay? They get into a house, yes, but when they can’t make the payments, they lose the house — along with their credit rating.

They end up worse off than before.

This was completely foreseeable and in fact many people did foresee it. One political party, in Congress and in the executive branch, tried repeatedly to tighten up the rules. The other party blocked every such attempt and tried to loosen them…

…It’s not too late. You know that if the situation were reversed, and the truth would damage McCain and help Obama, you would be moving heaven and earth to get the true story out there.

If you want to redeem your honor, you will swallow hard and make a list of all the stories you would print if it were McCain who had been getting money from Fannie Mae, McCain whose campaign had consulted with its discredited former CEO, McCain who had voted against tightening its lending practices…

More, much more, at the LINK.

Interesting that it would take a lifelong Democrat to upbraid the Mass Media Podpeople Hivemind so unequivocally. Maybe, if there remain even a few more–a remnant of honest, decent men and women–such people in the Democratic Party (and hopefully a few in the Replublican Party as well), just maybe there is hope for the republic of the Foun ders that once was.

I’ll not hold my breath, though. Rather, I’ll use it to cheer such folks on. Way to go, Card!

h.t. Jerry Pournelle’s mailbag


Trackposted to Blog @ MoreWhat.com, , Faultline USA, DragonLady’s World, The Pink Flamingo, Leaning Straight Up, Cao’s Blog, Democrat=Socialist, Conservative Cat, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Conspiracy of dunces or…

…a conspiracy to create dunces?

But first, some housekeeping: this is an open post. Link to this post and trackback.

Now, to the topic of this post. Jerry Pournelle is no wild-eyed conspiracy nut, but he does note something interesting about America’s broken system of public education:

Of course if the goal is to see that the children of people rich enough to send their children to private schools, or to have a stay at home parent to home school, will get far ahead of everyone else regardless of intelligence or merit, we may achieve that goal.

So, what are our choices? That all the “smart” people who tell us to just do more of the same that has resulted in sub- and illiterate high school and college graduates over the past 30+ years-just spend lots more doing it-are too stupid to pound rocks and too prideful, greedy and power-hungry to admit their educratic edicts have made a ruin of public education?

Or, is it really a plot by self-designated elites to breed serfs?

Of course, Pournelle also mentions “…Vonnegut’s wonderful story Harrison Bergeron…” (IMO, one of the few really good Vonnegut works). Yep. Harrison Bergeron is definitely where the dark side of “No Child Left behind” seems to point…

Kept after school at The Uncooperative Blogger. And “writing lines” on the blackboard at Linkfest_Haven

The Sad State of Education

[Although this was posted Monday night, consider this Tuesday’s 0PEN P0ST. Link and teebee away, folks. Questions? Ask ’em in comments.]

No, the “Sad State” is not a locale. *sigh* And it’s not limited to the United States, from what aquaintances in Australia, Britain, Canada, France and elsewhere tell me. It seems the West as a rule is intent on committing suicide and educational malpractice is just one of the chosen means. But this post only deals with a few limited aspects of the problem in the U.S.

This recent (one of many, many such) discussion at Chaos Manor touches briefly on just one aspect of the deplorable state of education in the U.S. While I think Dr. Pournelle’s probably correct on the fundamental issue of reading comprehension (which evidence indicates has declined even further from the deplorable state reflected in the 1992 NALS), the problem of reading comprehension is much more complex than simply poor decoding, as I am sure he’d agree.

Nevertheless, the fact that so very many high school and college grads are such poor functional readers, needing to actually struggle to decode the text, and thus actually read very little of consequence (why struggle with difficult concepts unless absolutely necessary when struggling with the coded text is difficult enough?) and comprehend so little, so shallowly, what they do read is extremely troubling.

(Have difficulty parsing long, complicated, convoluted sentences? Blame your teachers, in part.)

A subliterate democracy is in serious trouble. On many levels. An obvious area of concern is that of an informed electorate. If you have the stomach for it, listen to some blow-dried newspuppets for a while. Even “reading” their prepared scripts is too much for these airheads. Seldom does a newsreader notice that some other subliterate has handed them copy that contains misused words or amphibolous construction, let alone more problematic, outright lies. Why? Because their shallow education and lack of breadth and depth of reading has left most of them incapable of even knowing when they are spewing gibberish.

But no problem. Most of the people who get their information from such “sources” can’t tell, anyway.

And that’s a real problem. Combine arrogant elitism and greed with subliteracy (the typical problems of elite so-called liberals and their welfare plantation serfs) and it’s no wonder “progressive” social programs are disasters, felled by unintended (to put the best construction on it) consequences. Combine cowardice, greed and subliteracy (but three of faux “conservative” problems) and the recipe is just as disasterous.

In each case, only one of the variables is open to much amelioration via public policy, and that’s the true literacy rate.

Of course, changes there seem next to impossible, as long as the least competent to direct education are influencing what is taught and how. I mean, of course, professors of education in colleges and universities whose faddish experimentations with generations of American students have been largely instrumental in creating the cesspool that is public education today. And who could neglect to mention the politicians and educrats from Washington D.C. down to State legislatures who have made huge strides toward creating generations of stupid American sheeple?

Washington D.C. Easily the worst school system in the country. And Congress is directly responsible for administering it. Yeh. The more congresscritters can make the rest of the country like D.C….

And public school administrators. *sigh* Bless their little pea-pickin’ hearts. Or perhaps I ought to say, little pea-brained heads. Not exactly dumber than rocks, but certainly the most proximal stumbling blocks to most children’s early education. (Love the redundancy? πŸ™‚

What to do? I’m with Pournelle on several remedies.

1.) Teach them to read. No, really read. There are vanishingly few children who cannot be taught to read with greatly better proficiency than is reflected in the latest NAAL report. Oh, BTW, only folks who are both able and willing to drill down into the actual report will discover that. The website could easily mislead (well, by outright lies, in a few cases *sigh*) people into believing things have improved since 1992 with the summary statements and topic headlines. Remember: it’s a highly-politicized topic and the report is heavy on CYA.

2.) Put control of local curriculum and teaching methodology back at the local level. Period. Some schools will excell. Some will end up “excelling” only in mediocrity. Others will be abject failures. But in any case, the schools need to be completely the responsibility of the local citizens, no matter how dim-witted and uninformed they may have been made by their own educatinal experiences. There are almost always enough people who both care about there children’s education and are capable of rational thought to make locally-managed (no, really: no state or federal “mandates” funded or otherwise!) to make a go of it.

3.) (This one is not Pournelle’s formulation) Give productive work to education professors. Breaking rocks or cleaning cesspools or something. ANYTHING but letting them corrupt another generation of teachers.

It’d take some shakeout time, but in the end removing remote management by educrats and politicians and stifling dumbass “schools of education” this pseudo democratic republic just might have a chance of surviving.

Otherwise, we’d better get ready to hand the keys over to China.

(BTW, I’ve alluded to this before, but a quick restatement here might be in order. While I began my pubschool journey well before half of the Americans alive today were born, I do not consider my own education to have been untouched by the idiocies we see around us today. My own gradeschool through high school years [college and grad were private schools] were filled with pap. I was always amazed at my gransparents’ educational depth-especially after I began to be exposed in college to many of the things they learned in their high school years. Yep. Though three of my four grandparents did attend college, and two attain degrees-one advanced degrees-their personal libraries of high school texts contained significant cultural literacy that I never even had classroom exposure to in college! Or grad school… Glad am I for my grandparents’ examples of continuing education apart from formal schooling… Oh, yeh, my parents, too, I guess. heh πŸ™‚

Kept after school at Basil’s.

[Minor update for proofreaders: No, I’m NOT going to correct any more typos. I will change the batteries in my wireless keyboard, though. πŸ™‚