Bugs ‘n’ Fixes

Well, even Windows 7 has its shortcomings. I’ll not list them here (feel free to do so in comments *heh*). It is still the est thing M$ has done in quite a long while, and easily Good Enough for most uses, good enough, in fact, to supplant Ubuntu (in any flavor, including the attractive and full-featured Mint) as my daily use OS for most uses. That’s going some.

But still, some rough edges, and so M$ has made an effort to make it more secure with a better update process (though still not as good as some ‘nix distros manage… most of the time), th free Microsoft Security Essentials (which is pretty good) and…

Microsoft Fixit, a website devoted to some easily-run fixes for Windows annoyances. It’s actually pretty useful. Surprise, surprise. πŸ™‚ Of course, when I visited the place recently using the (very) new Opera 11 beta, which is very, very, very good in almost all respects, I noticed that Microsofties aren’t the only ones who can have bugs slip in from time to time:

*heh*

Browser Wars Revisited

A recent post had me taking another look at different browsers. I have four currently installed (well, five, sort of, in different physical machines–maybe even seven, depending on how one want to count things), and I try to make use of them all from time to time. All the browsers I currently use to one degree or another–Opera, Chrome (and SWIron, a de-Google-tracking Chome-based browser), Firefox and Internet Exploder–are generally Good Enough for most folks’ use, but the latter three all have serious drawbacks for me for the ways I prefer to use a browser.

Chrome, Firefox and Internet Exploder install as “crippled” compared with an installation of Opera, right “out of the box” as it were. Chrome comes closest to Opera for built-in features, but close enough only if one were using the browsers to play horseshoes with hand grenades. (*heh* Metaphors are for mixing, IMO :-)) None of the three offer the kind of flexibility and customization Opera does without having to add widgets or extensions. Just look at the form-filling functions of the browsers, for one. Opera offers–right off a fresh install–more form-filling options than the others. And whether using “opera:config” or text editing ini files, Opera offers in-depth customization that’s either not possible or extremely difficult (without some form of extension added in) in the other browsers. And having offered mouse gestures, tabbed browsing and features such as Speed Dial for years before the other browsers, Opera simply does all those elements more elegantly, as is illustrated by the new, built-in, Stacked Tabs feature in Opera 11 (beta) that performs functions similar to (but again, more elegantly than) the Firefox Tab Candy extension that Mozilla is now in the process of building into FF4.

Oh, there’re more reasons why I still prefer Opera, and the new Opera 11 beta is adding to them, but apart from the security concerns I continue to have about IE and FF (FF had more security problems last year than the other three browsers combined; all eventually fixed, IIRC, but still… ), any of these four will work for most users.

Safari? Not even on my radar any more. Just not Good Enough, period. Some of the ‘nix-only browsers like Konqueror and Seamonkey? *yech!* Definitely Not Good Enough for regular use. (*heh* My first download/install on any new ‘nix machine–physical or virtual–after system updates is always Opera, usually the latest beta, despite warnings from the OSes that “down” versions are preferred for stability. So far, the Opera Software site has always selected the best version for the particular ‘nix variant I’m using, and installing has been as easy, if not easier, in recent ‘nix distros as in Windows.)

That’s how it is here at twc central. One user here uses SWIron about as often as Opera, but that’s the largest divergence from twc central’s norm, and mostly because advanced browser use just isn’t on that user’s horizon, so Chrome’s minimalist approach works pretty well in her use.

BTW, used SWIron to post this. PITA, but it works for simple things like this all right, I suppose. πŸ™‚

VM Fun

So, I had this lil 30+GB 2.5″ ATA hard drive laying around. Old tech. Thought to myself, “Self, what useful purpose can this lil thing serve?” Answered self, “Self, put it in an external case and install some VMs on it!” “Why, that’s a very good idea, Self. I think I’ll do just that!”

So, after a miniscule amount of time (about what it took recently for an “Anytime Upgrade” of Widows 7 Home Premium to Windows 7 Ultimate on lil toy compie), Ubuntu 10.10 was running from the lil external 2.5″ drive.

Can carry it with my anywhere, now. Next, Linux Mint and a couple more.


Later… I used Portable Virtualbox to run the VMs (yes, Linux Mint’s on board now), and the experience is little different to a regular Virtualbox installation. Maybe a tad quicker to install. As usual, installing the VB Guest Additions is a little less straightforward in Linux guests than in Windows guests. Not difficult by any means, just a bit more fiddling.

I think I’ll ditch the Ubuntu 10.10 VM and keep the Mint VM, as Mint uses 10.10 Ubuntu as its starting point but includes quite a few more media apps and codecs from the getgo, and the seamless integration of such things is kinda nice for a lazy semi-geek like me.

Cutting Users a Slight Bit of Slack

It’s been my firm view that malware doesn’t infect folks’ computers. Folks infect their computers with malware as a result of laziness or carelessness.

Well, I still hold that view. Properly patched computers with up-to-date anti-malware from a well-respected anti-malware software vendor, operated by users who practice safe surfing and generally safe computing practices are… safe.

But folks get careless or lazy and don’t keep their OSes and applications up-to-date, don’t run regular full scans with their anti-malware, do visit “risky” sites (and don’t have or don’t pay attention to link scanning software), etc.

Recently two very (very) smart people I know did infect themselves with some malware by CLICKing on a popup “warning” that looked very much like a Microsoft Security Essentials window. One told me he thought as he clicked on it, “Oh, no! I shouldn’t have done that!” but by then it was too late. Took about an hour and a half to fully clean his system (only about 15 minutes on my part, since I could trust him to do the rest of the procedure himself, after having it lined out for him). The other person? Knew she’d infected herself and what she’d done to do so but had no clue how to extricate herself from the problem.

OK, I’m going to give some general Windows guidelines for avoiding infection from the kinds of fake anti-malware infectors these folks(and many less smart folks who had NO idea where or how they’d “been infected”) infected themselves with, and a couple of hints on manual fixes if you’ve gone ahead and infected yourself anyway:

1. No! Do NOT click on that warning! Not anywhere! No, don’t do it! Continue reading “Cutting Users a Slight Bit of Slack”

Another Compgeeky Trifle

I mentioned my upgrade of passwords on my own computers and online accounts here at twc central a while back. Essentially, it involved using the first letters of words in lyrics of songs I know, modified a bit to obscure even those letters. Well, as I began doing this, I reflected on the many, many songs (once) in my performance repertoire that are in various languages other than English, and then I thought to meself, “Self, why not take a mix of those lyrics in both the original language and English and select the first letters of the words in those lyrics, then mix upper/lowercase letters, numbers and symbols in for those letters (in my own idiosyncratic manner)?”

And so it is. First letters of words to lyrics of songs I know in French/Russian/German/Italian/English (mixmastered at will), with liberal substitutions for those letters using symbols or numerals (some Roman numerals, even, subbing in for letters) resulting in passwords 60-80 characters long in many cases that are nevertheless memorable enough for me that a password storage and encryption app isn’t really necessary. Of course, I am assembling a hard copy of the key to relate each song to its site/use. And, also of course, the master key doesn’t name the songs. *heh*

Oh! There’s an idea! Melodies used as passwords! Encode them using both letters and numerals an use that as passwords. Good one. I know far more tunes than I know lyrics, and I could even transpose one tune (and add harmonies via a figured bass or “Nashville” notation) and use it for many different sites/uses.

Now, if I could just use audio passwords and whistle different tunes as passwords… If sensitivity were set high enough, I imagine fine differentials in tuning could be included. I’d like that, as I can still hear and reproduce pitches well. Heck, I could just use the two pitches that are always present via tinitus and reproduce them together (hum one, whistle the other) to produce the combined waveform. Now, that’d be a nice password. *heh*

Of course, I suppose I could use some sort of encrypted storage of passwords combined with a biometric master device, lie my Wonder Woman has on her lil notebook, but I’d have to add ’em all over the place, so no.

Upgrading my passwords is proving to be a bit more fun than I had thought it might be.

Anti-malware

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes weighs in on The sorry state of antivirus software.

All the ideas in the article for improving anti-malware softwares are worthwhile. I’d disagree with his simplistic sneer at “experts” who tell folks they’re to blame for their own infestation of malware. Ed Bott’s problem mentioned in the article, as well as most of the otherwise smart folks whose systems I clean from time to time, is that he was simply not careful enough. Scheduling regular full scans, doing manual scans with different anti-malware softwares and even regular, scheduled times to visit respected online scanning services aren’t enough in today’s Windows computing world. Firefox and Internet Exploder–the two most common browsers–are sadly lacking as secure browsing platforms. Out-of-the-box, I’d not use either one as a browser. With add-ons, they can both become a bit more secure (a link scanner like AVGs, WOT, whatever), but even then, “smart folks” sometimes unthinkingly do risky things on the net. Both Chrome and Opera, as two examples, are more secure in a fresh install and can be made more secure with add-ons. A sandboxed browser is even better for protecting one’s computer during browsing–and sandboxing other internet applications isn’t a bad idea, either.

And those are just the surface things one can do to become more secure using a Windows computer. More important is developing commonsense habits that make one more secure. One habit I’ve mentioned already: NEVER neglect regular full scans with a well-respected, fully up-to-date anti-malware, etc. Another is mentioned in the article: keeping one’s system (and that doesn’t just mean the OS but also one’s applications) up to date, fully patched. Others are harder to get many–even “smart” users–to adopt.

Use secure passwords and change them on a regular basis. Sure, remembering a 16 to 64 character string of semi-randomized characters is hard for some folks, and typing them in all the time is cumbersome, but there are good utilities to save them in encrypted form and enter them given one master password. The better ones cost money, though, and some otherwise smart folks are too cheap to cough up for them.

And then there are the folks who unthinkingly simply CLICK through the security prompts in Windows Vista/7. *sigh* A Very Good Habit to develop is to STOP THAT!!! *heh*

View all emails in plain text mode. Seriously. Hard to get folks to do, but nowadays it’s just the smart thing to do.

NEVER install ANY application from ANYWHERE without FIRST manually scanning it with a well-respected, up-to-date anti-malware. No, never. Period. Is this simply paranoia? Probably, but I’ve not infected any of my own systems, yet, going all the way back to the DOS “stone age”. Have I been sent infected files by smart people? Yes. Even from some Very, Very Smart People. Installed them (or in any way let them be close to executed)? No.

Good hardware/software firewalls (on devices protected with strong passwords and data encryption), Regular Backups (!!!) and good general security habits are still just about all one needs, IMO, to be pretty darned safe. Is there room for improvement in security softwares and the Windows OS? Yes, and there always will be. Is the even more room for improvement in users’ habits? Yes. Always will be. Both of those things keep my pockets jingling. πŸ™‚

A Trifling Tidbit

…if that’s not entirely redundant. πŸ˜‰

For a long time now, I’ve chosen passwords based on a topic-subtopic-specific, misspelled and then with added characters and numerals and upper/lowercase letters interspersed to make a word (preferably longer than 12 letters) or phrase sort-of-halfway-kinda resemble the original word or phrase in a manner that’s memorable to me.

Recently, though, somehow my gmail account became vulnerable despite what several online password checkers from reputable companies thought was a “strong password” so…

I’ve begun changing my passwords again, this time using lyrics to songs I know–some that are even “semi-unpublished” *heh*

Here’s the trick:

Write out (if you’re a little unsure of the lyrics) the lyrics to a song–the older and less likely to be common knowledge among the illiterati the better. Now, select the first letter of each word of the first (or second or third… ) verse. Assemble those into your “rough sketch” for a password. Now, in some way that makes sense to you–all the letters from the first half of the alphabet, all vowels, all “voiced” consonants, etc.–capitalize some of the letters. Substitute numbers for other letters. Add characters like “@!%#” at places within the string of letters in ways that make some loose sense to you.

I recently changed out my first (of more than a few) email passwords with a 40-character password devised this way. Yes, I have my passwords saved on hardcopy in place that’s accessible to family only, and yes I have them saved in an encrypted, password-protected zipped text file.

It’s not all that hard, and it beats putting your birth date or wedding anniversary on a sticky note slapped on your monitor… *heh* By quite a lil bit.

Oh, my computers’ passwords are considerably less complex, because

  1. They’re in a fairly secure environment and
  2. Anyone wanting to crack ’em can probably do so with Ophcrack or other tools, anyway.

Dumbing Down to “Catch Up”

Opera 11 browser will finally allow extensions to the browser to be installed. The vast crowd of Firefox Zombies may now pay some attention to Opera, though for the wrong reasons, of course. A commenter at the Opera Desktop Team blog summed up my first thoughts pretty well:

But hey, progress I guess. Even if it’s progress to play “catch up” with other barebones, feature-poor browsers that need extensions to make them complete.

Indeed. I use Firefox and Chrome as much as I can stand to do so, and find them to be clumsy, feature-poor browsers that very obviously need extensions just to emulate many of the basic functionalities already built in (and for quite some time) to Opera. And I have yet to find extensions for those browsers that allow me to easily emulate some of the more advanced features I use every day in Opera.

Oh, well. Maybe folks who simply haven’t looked at Opera because it “doesn’t have extensions” (that it doesn’t usually need) will look at it now that the desktop team has decided to catch back with those “feature-poor browsers that need extensions to make them complete.” (I can recall one loon “tech writer” griping a few years ago because Opera didn’t have an extension for ad blocking or for mouse gestures. Idiot. Those are built in features of Opera.)

Quick Security Tip for Lazy Surfers

If you want to be at least minimally responsible in your surfing but don’t want to put a lot of thought into it, here’s a quick lil tutorial on avoiding unsafe sites. The writer’s preferred solution, WOT, is better than not half bad, and with a javascript implementation, it’s even useful cross-platform and cross-browser. Here’s a WOT-enabled Google search on “free” (the red circle says, essentially, “Click this link only of you are really stupid”):

WOT’s not to like?

I Sincerely Hope This Proves to be “Not Interesting”

*heh*

WHat to do for lunch? Oh, this: I just began an “Anytime Upgrade” of Lil Toy Computer from Windows 7 Home Premium to Win7 Ultimate using a spare (completely legal, purchased in a “bulk” deal for personal use only from M$) full install key.

I hope the upgrade process and result is as boring as possible. I really don’t have time for “interesting” today. I’ll let you know…


Took eight minutes. Entirely “automagical”. *yawn* So, what’s the result? In practical terms, it means I now get to use the Local Group Policy Editor on this machine (updating this post from Lil Toy Computer, now) as well as the machines (physical and virtual) running Win7 Professional.