About That Per Diem Scandal That Isn’t…

About that scandal the Mass Media Podpeople Hivemind is attempting to manufacture out of Governor Palin’s per diem and travel expenses. Let’s go to an organ that leans just slightly to the right of Lenin (which means light years to the right of the New York Times, of course)–

WaPo:

Palin, who earns $125,000 a year, claimed and received $16,951 as her allowance, which officials say was permitted because her official “duty station” is Juneau, according to an analysis of her travel documents by The Washington Post.

The governor’s daughters and husband charged the state $43,490 to travel, and many of the trips were between their house in Wasilla and Juneau, the capital city 600 miles away, the documents show.

Oh, my! Governor Palin claimed expenses allowed under the law! Scandal! Horror! Run for the hills!

Of course, let’s see if anything she did ameliorated even this horrible, legal use of benefits specifically allowed her…

Fired [Retasked/transferred to another more useful-to-the-taxpayers job elsewhere in the state government] the Governor’s personal chef, an expense to the taxpayers of around $45,000/year. Hmmm… seems the per diem was offset by a factor of about 2.7.

Advantage: the people of Alaska.

Travel expenses:

–Palin’s family: $43,490 “in the first nineteen months” of her tenure in office. Let’s see, that works out to an annual amount of about $27,467.37

The previous administration? Governor Murkowski’s wife spent $30,637.25 in state travel expense money, mostly going on shopping trips.

So, no loss to the people of Alaska, and since there’s documentation–even the WaPo admits that–to support the official use by Palin’s family that trumps Mrs. Murkowski’s shopping trips, advantage: Palin.

And what of Palin’s travel expenses during her first nineteen months as governor? Was she a wastrel or did she indeed save the people f Alaska money?

The previous governor, Murkowski, spent $463,000 in his last year alone. Palin’s expenses for her first nineteen months have amounted to $93,000.

Advantage: the people of Alaska.

And naturally, in order to protect the WaPo’s false claim to objectivity, mitigating information is mentioned, but buried deep under the lede to attempt creating a false impression of inflated and somehow illegitimate “per diem” expenses. Oh? Near the foot of an “investigative” article,

“…under state policy, all of the governor’s children are entitled to per diem expenses, even her infant son” but as of August 5th, such expense reimbursements had been declined by the family.1

Buried deep, where subliterate Americans are unlikely to venture, in a WaPo article, of course.

And at the foot of that same article,

“…during the Murkowski years, that practice was questioned, and the state attorney general’s office produced an opinion saying laws then in effect required reimbursement for spousal travel.”1

But here’s the kicker–also buried in areas where few subliterate Americans dare to tread in the WaPo:

The popular governor collected the per diem allowance from April 22, four days after the birth of her fifth child, until June 3, when she flew to Juneau for two days. Palin moved her family to the capital during the legislative session last year, but prefers to stay in Wasilla and drive 45 miles to Anchorage to a state office building where she conducts most of her business, aides have said.1

So, let me get this straight: the scandal is that Palin’s per diem allowance was paid while she worked from home on the business of the people of Alaska for a while after the birth of her fifth child, Trig. Oh! My! What an evil woman! That she didn’t simply claim maternity leave and tell the Alaskan people to go shove it but continued to do her job, or instead commute into Anchorage or Juneau and back and forth with a newborn ( legitimately charging for both her travel expenses and a per diem for herself and Trig while doing so) OR move her whole family into official digs, sop up the life of Riley with a personal chef and guzzle at the public trough like previous governors is evil, evil, evil! Yes, evil, I tell you!

*feh* Is that the best the Mass Media Podpeople Hivemind and its spores at DailyKos and Dhimmicrappic Underpants can do? Only absolute idiots will buy that crap. (But then again, by at least semi-objective criteria, about half the American public is made up of idiots, if one believes the polls that have the two presidential races at a virtual tie… )


Trackposted to Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Leaning Straight Up, Democrat=Socialist, and The World According to Carl, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

The Weirdest Obama Rumor?

Obama is the Goa’uld Apophis.

OK, so it’s creepy how much he looks like the Stargate SG-1 character (but only–really–because of the sizable ear flaps on Apophis’ headgear–and Apophis still isn’t nearly as “scary” looking as Obama *heh*), and it’s about as funny as these kind of loony rumors get, but it’s still not as loopy as some of the rumors and false reports that made it into the Mass Media Podpeople “reportage” about Governor Palin in the first week after her tapping for veep candidate.

Still, for a completely off-the-wall, foul ball out past the left field wall, sendup of a rumor, it’s at least

a. more credible and
b. funnier

than most of the crazy accusations flung Governor Palin’s way for the past week-and-a-half.

Lefty Reasoning?

Let’s see if I can come up with an understanding of leftist reasoning…

Nobody is better than Obama!
Palin is nobody.
Therefore… Palin is better than Obama?

Oops.

*heh*

(OK, OK, so it’s an equivocation, but it’s still sounder reasoning than anything I’ve heard from lefties recently on the subject, even though it does include the “Palin is nobody” falsehood. And at least I constructed it knowing it was based on a fallacy, and I admitted it, two steps better what’s been bruited about by lefties running scared.)

Blog for Sarah?

No, this blog has not become a single-issue blog for Sarah Palin, but…

If Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Golda Meir and Winston Churchill had been easier on the eyes…

*heh*

Yeh, easy on the eyes makes it easier to pay attention. She’s not just another bland (yeh, even The Obamassiah’s bland by comparison) artificial political construct.

And then there’s her voice. While Ye Olde Voice Coache *heh* in me would like to have a couple of months to work with her voice (which sounds like a nice basic instrument), another part of me, the part that hears my wife’s “north country” relatives’ vowels and is comforted thereby, just relaxes and smiles at hearing a genuine voice, untainted by East and Left coast mass media manufactured diction.

And then, easy on the eyes face, comforting to the ears/soul voice making it easier to hear the smart and true and telling words she utters: very powerful. (Simply making paying attention easier is a powerful, powerful tool for political persuasion.)

Couple that with a record that is a compelling testimony to good works–and yes, I have read her detractors, and frankly, so far, all the shrill and angry voices serve as an endorsement of Palin; one can tell a lot about a person by looking at who chooses to be their enemy, you know–and the Palin addition to the ticket truly validates Bill Dyer’s campaign slogan for the McCain/Palin ticket:

I look forward to 2012 and 2016–or even 2016 and 2020, should I make it that far–*heh*–when we might anticipate a Palin/Jindal ticket to vote for…

🙂


Greta van Susteren: Introducing Sarah Palin…

Oops. I can’t recall where I first heard of this Greta van Susteren segment doing remote interviews of three (representative? Probably, since last week her approval rating was above 80% with Alaskans–down only a few percentage points since early in her term) Alaskans who purport to know Sarah Palin well, but whoever tipped me to it, thanks!

Of course, there are some with sour grapes: the librarian from Palin’s first term as Mayor of Wasilla who vents a lot of spleen whnever Palin’s name comes up; her scumbag former brother-in-law; some loser she pounded into the pavement in the governor’s race (I think he got about 10% of the vote), etc. All to be expected. Heck, George Washington (not that I’m saying Palin’s a Washington–I’m not) had his detractors in his day, eh? Most of ’em with about as much reason as Palin’s detractors, from all I can discover so far.


Trackposted to The Pink Flamingo, Mark My Words, CORSARI D’ITALIA, Conservative Cat, Shadowscope, and DragonLady’s World, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.