Author: David

Just CLICK this link and watch “Stolen Honor”—the whole 42-minute documentary.

And pass this link (http://stolenhonor.com/documentary/watch-video.asp ) on to everyone you know!

DSM IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition) lists 9 basic criteria for being Narcissistic:

1. has a grandiose sense of self importance
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
3. believes he/she is special and unique and can only be understood by or associate with others who share the same qualities
4. requires excessive admiration
5. has a sense of entitlement
6. is interpersonally exploitive
7. lacks empathy
8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him/her
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

Hmmm… sound like anyone running for President this year? At least six of the nine criteria definitely apply to sKerry. Given his mythic tales of his accomplishments, even number 2 is a strong possibility.

Does anyone know a better diagnostic fit for his personality? (I mean, of course, apart from “son of Satan, the father of lies”.)

DSM IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition) lists 9 basic criteria for being Narcissistic:

1. has a grandiose sense of self importance
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
3. believes he/she is special and unique and can only be understood by or associate with others who share the same qualities
4. requires excessive admiration
5. has a sense of entitlement
6. is interpersonally exploitive
7. lacks empathy
8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him/her
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

Hmmm… sound like anyone running for President this year? At least six of the nine criteria definitely apply to sKerry. Given his mythic tales of his accomplishments, even number 2 is a strong possibility.

Does anyone know a better diagnostic fit for his personality? (I mean, of course, apart from “son of Satan, the father of lies”.)

Two documents at the Vietnam Archive at Texas Tech University at Lubbock, TX, shed some light on sKerry’s meetings with the North Vietnam and Viet Cong representatives in Paris during the Vietnam War. The articles, a “circular” numbered 2150901039bin the archive and a “directive” numbered 2150901041, are Viet Cong documents that show both the favorable lightin which the Vietcong viewed the VVAW (Kerry’s organ) and Kerry’s parroting of the negotiating stance—point-by-point—of Madame Binh, the head of the Vietcong’s “delegation” to the Paris Peace Talks.

See the article at The New York Sun, the one at Worldnet Daily and , the one at Wintersoldier.com. Wintersoldier.com is, of course, the most detailed as it is founded and staffed mostly by former Vietnam Vets… That article, titled, “John Kerry and the VVAW: Hanoi’s American Puppets?” includes commentary/analysis such as

[These] newly uncovered documents help clarify the relationship of the North Vietnamese, the Vietcong, the PCPJ, the Communist Party of the USA, and John Kerry’s VVAW. They indicate that these organizations worked closely together, using the Paris Peace Talks as a central point of communication, to employ the strategy and tactics devised by the Vietnamese communists to achieve their primary objective: the defeat of the United States of America in Vietnam.

But do read the whole thing. If, after reading it, you do not believe the portion of the XIV Amendment that refers to “an officer of the United States” having unauthorized dealings with an enemy of the United States during time of war compelling disqualification from holding office in the Senate applies to sKerry, then you need to re-read the article(s).

After returning from his first meeting with Madame Binh, sKerry began promoting her talking points, item by item, even going so far as to slander all the troops who were in Vietnam as war criminals before the Fullbright Committee and “confessing” to having committed “war crimes” himself in TV and newspaper interviews.

The question you must ask yourself is this: having lied and betrayed his country and his “band of brothers” in order to kick start his public lust for power, and having continued by means of lies large and small (invented “facts” and mythic “accomplishments”) to promote himself while marking time in the Senate, even continuing to lie to this very day about his record there, can you trust him to do a single damned thing he says he’ll do? Or should you instead count on him to do as he has done in the past, that is, do everything in his power to assure the defeat of an America weakened by his actions?

Two documents at the Vietnam Archive at Texas Tech University at Lubbock, TX, shed some light on sKerry’s meetings with the North Vietnam and Viet Cong representatives in Paris during the Vietnam War. The articles, a “circular” numbered 2150901039bin the archive and a “directive” numbered 2150901041, are Viet Cong documents that show both the favorable lightin which the Vietcong viewed the VVAW (Kerry’s organ) and Kerry’s parroting of the negotiating stance—point-by-point—of Madame Binh, the head of the Vietcong’s “delegation” to the Paris Peace Talks.

See the article at The New York Sun, the one at Worldnet Daily and , the one at Wintersoldier.com. Wintersoldier.com is, of course, the most detailed as it is founded and staffed mostly by former Vietnam Vets… That article, titled, “John Kerry and the VVAW: Hanoi’s American Puppets?” includes commentary/analysis such as

[These] newly uncovered documents help clarify the relationship of the North Vietnamese, the Vietcong, the PCPJ, the Communist Party of the USA, and John Kerry’s VVAW. They indicate that these organizations worked closely together, using the Paris Peace Talks as a central point of communication, to employ the strategy and tactics devised by the Vietnamese communists to achieve their primary objective: the defeat of the United States of America in Vietnam.

But do read the whole thing. If, after reading it, you do not believe the portion of the XIV Amendment that refers to “an officer of the United States” having unauthorized dealings with an enemy of the United States during time of war compelling disqualification from holding office in the Senate applies to sKerry, then you need to re-read the article(s).

After returning from his first meeting with Madame Binh, sKerry began promoting her talking points, item by item, even going so far as to slander all the troops who were in Vietnam as war criminals before the Fullbright Committee and “confessing” to having committed “war crimes” himself in TV and newspaper interviews.

The question you must ask yourself is this: having lied and betrayed his country and his “band of brothers” in order to kick start his public lust for power, and having continued by means of lies large and small (invented “facts” and mythic “accomplishments”) to promote himself while marking time in the Senate, even continuing to lie to this very day about his record there, can you trust him to do a single damned thing he says he’ll do? Or should you instead count on him to do as he has done in the past, that is, do everything in his power to assure the defeat of an America weakened by his actions?

Go ahead, say it out loud: “Al Qaqaa.” That’s right, now that you’ve said it out loud, you can say it again about the NYT story trumpeting the horror! the horror! of 380 tons of “missing” explosives they wanna blame on Bush.

Qaqaa, all right. According to NBC’s embedded reporters who were on the scene in 2003 when the Al QaQaa dump was inspected, it was gone before our guys got there. In fact, U.N. inspectors’ reports (NOT the faked up report “leaked” by a vindictive “IAEA and its head, the anti-American Mohammed El Baradei”) indicate the ex[plosives may have been moved before the Iraq War started.

NYT: al Qaqaa, indeed…

And to top it off, originally CBS was planning on airing the story on October 31 as a last-minute “October surprise” but got “beat” by the NYT printing a story… first reported by NBC in April of 2003, but this time with a “Beat Bush” slant.)

(Credit: tons of reports all over the web, and NBC—of all the irony possible, this has to be tops.)

Go ahead, say it out loud: “Al Qaqaa.” That’s right, now that you’ve said it out loud, you can say it again about the NYT story trumpeting the horror! the horror! of 380 tons of “missing” explosives they wanna blame on Bush.

Qaqaa, all right. According to NBC’s embedded reporters who were on the scene in 2003 when the Al QaQaa dump was inspected, it was gone before our guys got there. In fact, U.N. inspectors’ reports (NOT the faked up report “leaked” by a vindictive “IAEA and its head, the anti-American Mohammed El Baradei”) indicate the ex[plosives may have been moved before the Iraq War started.

NYT: al Qaqaa, indeed…

And to top it off, originally CBS was planning on airing the story on October 31 as a last-minute “October surprise” but got “beat” by the NYT printing a story… first reported by NBC in April of 2003, but this time with a “Beat Bush” slant.)

(Credit: tons of reports all over the web, and NBC—of all the irony possible, this has to be tops.)

“Marxism is an emotional disorder, not a political philosophy.”

“Marxism is an emotional disorder, not a political philosophy.”